Posted on 06/19/2024 7:05:49 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie
New York Times reports said structure could be taken down in early July, weeks earlier than planned and after only 10 days of actual operation, due to unexpected weather conditions
The aid pier built on the Gaza coast by the United States for some $200 million may be dismantled earlier than planned, according to a Tuesday media report, having so far completed a total of 10 days of actual operations.
The New York Times reported that US officials had told aid organizations in Gaza that the structure could be taken apart early in July, having done little to alleviate goods shortages in the Strip amid the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas.
The pier has been mostly inoperative since it was inaugurated in mid-May, due to weather damage, stormy seas and security concerns.
The US military was preparing to temporarily remove the humanitarian aid pier last week because of anticipated sea conditions, having just resumed bringing supplies into the enclave after suspending delivery the previous weekend.
“Today, due to expected high seas, the temporary pier will be removed from its anchored position in Gaza and towed back to Ashdod, Israel,” the US Central Command (CENTCOM) said in a social media post on Friday.
“The safety of our service members is a top priority and temporarily relocating the pier will prevent structural damage caused by the heightened sea state,” the post added. The pier involves about 1,000 US service members.
Trucks loaded with humanitarian aid from the United Arab Emirates and the United States Agency for International Development cross the Trident Pier before entering the beach in Gaza, May 17, 2024. (Staff Sgt. Malcolm Cohens-Ashley/US Army Central via AP)
Spring and the beginning of summer usually see calmer seas off the coast of Gaza, according to the report. The Times quoted retired US major general Paul D. Eaton, who has experience installing humanitarian aid piers in war zones, as saying, “Plan on X, and nature sends 2X.”
Aid began arriving via the pier on May 17, and the United Nations said it transported 137 trucks of aid to warehouses, some 900 metric tons, before the US announced on May 28 that it had suspended operations so repairs could be made.
UN officials have recently said they were reassessing the use of the pier, claiming that Israel Defense Forces activity nearby had jeopardized the perceived neutrality of the aid route. The concerns stemmed in part from false social media reports that Israel used the floating pier in a hostage rescue mission, though the Pentagon dismissed the claims out of hand.
Pentagon spokesperson Maj. Gen. Patrick Ryder said that there were Israeli helicopter operations “near” the pier, but confirmed that neither the structure nor any US military personnel were involved in the raid.
IDF Spokesperson Rear Adm. Daniel Hagari told reporters after the operation that rescuers had opted against returning the way they came, across a land border, as they were rushing out a mortally wounded commando. Instead, they sped toward the beach and the site of the US aid hub on Gaza’s coast, he said, where an Israeli helicopter touched down and helped whisk away the hostages and the commando.
Still, the UN World Food Program, which works with the US to transfer aid from the pier to warehouses and local aid teams for distribution within Gaza, suspended cooperation as it conducts a security review. Aid has been piling up on the beach since.
Despite coordinating aid distribution at the floating dock, the UN has remained adamant that aid deliveries by land are the “most viable, effective and efficient” way to combat the humanitarian crisis in the enclave of 2.3 million people. The UN has said at least 500 trucks a day are needed to enter Gaza.
The maritime route for a limited time had been an additional way to help get more aid into Gaza amid the war.
Egypt has refused to let aid through the Rafah Border Crossing since Israel took control of the Gaza side of the crossing in early May. The Kerem Shalom Crossing from Israel continues to operate despite coming under frequent attack from Hamas, and two recently opened crossings in northern Gaza are also operating.
US President Joe Biden’s administration has said from the start that the pier wasn’t meant to be a total solution and that any amount of aid helps.
Was the weather unexpected this time of year? Why do I expect the government is lying and the Times is covering for them?
A metaphor for the Biden admin.
“”$200 million””
Drop in the bucket - for those handing out OUR money!!!!!
Elsewhere, $320,000,000:
“12 Days, $320 Million: The Short Life of the Gaza Humanitarian Pier”
Divided by 137 truckloads delivered is $2,335,766.42 PER TRUCK!
Gold plated trucks. Musta been. With your tax dollars.
Never underestimate the ability of Joe Biden to mess things up.
Gaza aid pier the idea of a MORON
With 500 trucks per day needed to supply gazans with food, Joe managed 137 trucks.
Basically, Joe delivered breakfast. ONCE.
3 foot waves on an ocean = unexpected.....
These people are stupid.
I was on the beach in Tel Aviv one day the pier fell apart. It was a modest breeze, and surfers were barely able to catch a wave.
“could be taken down in early July, weeks earlier than planned”
Which part? The part that’s 15 miles up the coast in pieces, or the part that sank off the coast?
What a sentence! Trying to sanitize the truth about Biden’s disaster, again.
What did it cost? 350 million?
It was very successful
A bunch of contractors successfully extracted $380M from the government
Bet it was a loot more than that. And don’t forget the 1000 USA soldiers that don’t belong even in the neighborhood.
>>Was the weather unexpected this time of year? Why do I expect the government is lying and the Times is covering for them?<<
I wonder if operators at the ports of Ashkelon and Ashdod just up the coast consider recent sea conditions as “unexpected”? And how about the other 3 Israeli Mediterranean ports? The Times asked any of them?
Climate change....
Unexpected weather conditions, i.e., there are waves in the sea.
Just more taxpayer money pissed away by stupid democraps...
It sounds like they were just testing a concept to see if it could work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.