Where’s Lindsey Graham? He’s been silent on the Get Trump conviction.
He missed the Sunday Shows he loves so much.
Posted on 06/02/2024 4:55:46 PM PDT by McGruff
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump
The “Sentencing” for not having done anything wrong will be, conveniently for the Fascists, 4 days before the Republican National Convention. A Radical Left Soros backed D.A., who ran on a platform of “I will get Trump,” reporting to an “Acting” Local Judge, appointed by the Democrats, who is HIGHLY CONFLICTED, will make a decision which will determine the future of our Nation? The United States Supreme Court MUST DECIDE!
Jun 02, 2024, 6:51 PM
Could the Alvin Bragg case already be on the SCOTUS docket?
FR Posted on 6/2/2024, 11:09:20 AM by Sidebar Moderator
Speculation is running rampant about the need for a “hook” to get the Supremes to consider cert on the bogus Bragg conviction. Recall that the alleged “falsified” business records all supposedly occurred in 2017.
Last time I checked, Trump was president at the time. I’m not a lawyer, but if SCOTUS reaffirms broad presidential immunity (as I believe they will, definitely after the clown show in New York) on the basis of separation of powers, this will upend the J6 case, almost all of the documents case and the Fulton RICO case in its entirety. At a minimum, a broad immunity ruling could impact the Bragg case in interesting ways.
To reiterate.....the alleged “falsified” business records “so as not to influence an election,”
which cockeyed Bragg mfg as a “crime.” all supposedly occurred in 2017.
<><>Drum roll, please......Trump was already president at the time.
<><>Ta da.
If SCOTUS reaffirms broad presidential immunity (post-NY’s clown show) on the basis of separation of powers,
<><>this will upend the J6 case,
<><>almost all of the documents case
<><>and Fani’s Fulton RICO case in its entirety.
At a minimum, a broad immunity ruling could impact the Bragg case in interesting ways.
A former President and current Prez candidate was railroaded on charges never brought before, ever.
“No state prosecutor - in New York, or Wyoming, or anywhere - has ever charged federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime, against anyone, for anything.
None. Ever.”
Elie Honig
Never happened before in the history of Earth.
Supremes are all over this if it’s Swamp Royalty. Hillary, Joe, Comey.
Within hours.
Mark Levin has mentioned a common law precedence for situations like this. He can explain it better than me...
So are you saying we shouldn’t use SCOTUS because they might rule for us?
What kind of insanity is this?
If the Supremes rule for presidential immunity, it will have guardrails.
Let’s see if FJB, et al accept the decision of the SCOTUS.
Oh wait, I forgot, SCOTUS is a “right wing” organization that they’re allowed to criticize and ignore the rulings . . .
Cease with your logic and reason !
No, Trump is 100% correct. This Stalinist, Castro-loving bastard could either jail Trump, or limit his movements through house arrest or county confinement.
SCOTUS can’t get involved until the appeal process is done.
He could file a writ in the district he’s been convicted in, but Sotomayor would have to accept it. That’s not going to happen.
I believe you are right. And not because this is about Trump. Its about the very obvious destruction of our judicial system and how that will in turn deal a mortal blow to the country. The SC may in fact be the USAs salvation in this case.
What we in our family can’t understand are the cowardly Republicans In DC who only started whinging when the vast $$ came pouring into trump within 48 hours after the verdivt, and the sheer numbers of everyday people began openly supporting him. It should have been the entire GOP from the beginning of lawfare-not the scant handful!!! Don’t these Rinos understand, doesn’t the GOP understand, if this can be done successfully to Trump, what’s keeping them safe? What happens to them when we no longer have a country?
The same way they intervened in the GORE/BUSH election in 2000. Mark Levin reported the details of how to ask about a week ago.
Not even remotely the same type of case.
SCOTUS essentially can’t get involved before the state appeal process unless the member of SCOTUS who represents the district grants the writ to an emergency hearing. Soromayor? Zero chance.
Trump is stuck for a while.
Are you a lawyer?
*So what’s your solution?* Vote and get others to.
*Still...it’s gotta be done.* Doesn’t mean SCOTUS will take the case.
*So it’s an act of protecting the Supreme Court itself for them to take this case.*
Now THAT could be it.
*So are you saying we shouldn’t use SCOTUS because they might rule for us?*
We shouldn’t need them but if an appeals court fails do you expect SCOTUS to be our saving grace? The appeal-34 counts-they’ll find one to stick. It might take years. Remember the Oliver North exoneration in Sept. 1991? 5 years after Iran-Contra. Trump would be out of office. Go the appeals route.
There’s more. These frivolous lawsuits would end if loser pays. A good Trump topic in ‘25.
Depends on how gross it gets. If the judge decides to jail Trump or prevent him from campaigning, it becomes a minor court interfering with a national election.
If they jail Trump over this, and no one stops it ASAP, there is no USA. Any podunk judge can find an excuse to jail just about anyone they disagree with.
What they could do is issue a stay on anything affecting Trump’s campaigning until the appeals have been fully heard.
Would it be highly unusual? Yeah. So what? So is what NYC is doing!
Good luck with that...
Roberts, Kavanaugh, and Barrett are communist hole cards...
Bingo!
That was one of about 30 errors in a case that suggests more than just incompetence - it suggests an intentional pattern designed to disable the Republican party's single prospective candidate, who also just happens to be leading in public polls at the moment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.