Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Don’t Want You To Know How Moderate Trump’s Abortion Stance Is
The Federalist ^ | 04/10/2024 | David Harsanyi

Posted on 04/10/2024 10:42:27 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Come to think of it, the GOP’s federal bill is also pretty moderate.

Abortion on demand, for any reason, until birth, funded by taxpayers.

That’s the modern left’s position on the issue. Democrats are so dug into their extremism that they can’t even support bills that compel “doctors” to keep babies who survive a homicide attempt alive.

Perhaps most American voters don’t care enough. Maybe most voters aren’t even aware of the modern left’s radicalism. The political media might be plagued by partisan mediocrity, but when it comes to abortion, they have demonstrated an unmatched competency in misleading the public.

This week, Donald Trump released a statement contending that the abortion issue should be left to the states and refused to endorse any federal law. Because his position is inconveniently restrained, the Joe Biden campaign was compelled to focus on the former president’s flip-flops on the issue.

And virtually every outlet followed the president’s lead, zeroing in on Trump’s inconsistency. The Washington Post laid out “How Trump’s abortion stance has shifted over the years.” NBC News wrote up a “A timeline of Trump’s many, many positions on abortion.” “Why Trump Will Keep Flip-Flopping on Abortion in 2024,” explains a Time magazine headline. “13 times Trump’s abortion position shifted over the last 25 years,” appeared on CNN. And so on.

Fair enough. Trump is obviously taking a politically expedient position meant to diffuse the issue among independents and moderates. And it’s no great pronouncement to say that Trump isn’t any kind of social conservative. Whatever he believes or doesn’t, the former president worked with pro-life and pro-Constitution groups to put three originalist judges on the court because his constituents wanted him to do it. That court, perhaps the last properly functioning institution in the country, overturned one of the most preposterous and deadly decisions in American history.

Guess what? Biden is also a transactional politician. His goal is to delegitimize the court and Constitution and compel states to accept the Democrats’ maximalist position.

What no major media outlet, as far as I can tell, even bothered to point out was that Biden has also radically changed his position on abortion, from supporting virtually every restriction in the ’70s and ’80s — including overturning Roe v. Wade and handing the issue back to states — to taking a “middle-of-the-road” approach as vice president to Barack “above my paygrade” Obama, to now supporting abortion without any limits until birth.

Even during the 2020 campaign, Biden was still pro-Hyde Amendment — a law that bans direct government funding for abortion. This position, if we trust polls, is still popular. But it only took two days of criticism from progressives on social media to convince this feckless, weak man to capitulate to the far left and “denounce” the amendment.

“On Abortion, Trump Chose Politics Over Principles,” says The New York Times this week. When Biden had his abrupt reversal on Hyde in 2020, the Times assured readers the candidate had “grappled for decades with his views on abortion rights.”

We all know politicians are only permitted to “evolve” toward a pro-abortion position. It is odd, though, that every time Biden “grapples” with an issue — and he’s wrestled with virtually every one of them — he somehow always ends up precisely in the most politically convenient place. Weird how that works out.

In any event, as a pro-lifer, I find Trump’s milquetoast triangulation on the issue cowardly and completely expected — presidential candidates always moderate their positions for the general election. As a compromise, however, it is well within the norms of American governance. States should be making most of the decisions about how they conduct business.

Yet, Democrats like Bill Kristol claimed Trump’s waffling was “classic authoritarianism,” because they have completely lost the ability, it seems, to say anything else. We often hear the left argue that restricting abortion is an attack on “democracy.” Abortion, mentioned nowhere in the Constitution, is not a right. It is perfectly within our norms — nay, within the constitutional order — to empower voters in states, or even nationally, to decide the issue for themselves.

Anyway, if waffling on abortion is authoritarian, Bill Kristol is Benito Mussolini.

(Trump’s abortion statement, incidentally, came the same day Biden announced a new student loan “forgiveness” plan — ignoring Congress, defying the Supreme Court, breaking millions of private contracts, and unilaterally demanding taxpayers foot the bill. This unconstitutional vote-buying scheme doesn’t seem to bother any of our self-appointed defenders of democracy.)

For both constitutional and practical reasons, I believe the abortion fight is better fought on the state level. But, at the same time, Dobbs does not restrict federal action. And it must be noted that Democrats have zero compunction ramming through national abortion policy. It is difficult to maneuver locally — which, let’s face it, the GOP can barely do as it is — while Democrats work to make maximalist abortion legislation the law of the land.

And we shouldn’t lose sight of the fact that even the GOP federal position is far more reasonable than anything Democrats propose. Trump wants to avoid the debate, but Lindsey Graham’s “Protecting Pain-Capable Unborn Children from Late-Term Abortions Act” would have limited abortions past 15 weeks of pregnancy (which is when the vast majority of abortions take place, we are constantly informed) and included exceptions for rape and incest, protections for the woman’s life, and prohibitions from prosecuting women seeking abortions.

Democrats keep calling Graham’s bill a “ban,” when it’s clear it comports with the view of a large swath of voters, who do not believe in complete bans or complete license to kill human beings.

Though you’d never know it from the news.


David Harsanyi is a senior editor at The Federalist, a nationally syndicated columnist, a Happy Warrior columnist at National Review, and author of five books—the most recent, Eurotrash: Why America Must Reject the Failed Ideas of a Dying Continent. .


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: abortion; bloggers; concerntroll; concerntrolling; notanotherthread; trump

1 posted on 04/10/2024 10:42:27 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

I’ve always heard President in Exile Trump say that the STATES should have the call on abortion. He has always said he is Pro-Life.

Guess I need my ears checked. *SMIRK*


2 posted on 04/10/2024 10:49:24 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Abortion on demand until born paid for by taxpayers is NOT in any way a moderate position.

God help us.


3 posted on 04/10/2024 10:54:39 AM PDT by Persevero (You cannot comply your way out of tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

When you say always, how far back are you going?


4 posted on 04/10/2024 10:54:50 AM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They don’t want the public to know anything about Trump’s stances.


5 posted on 04/10/2024 11:12:08 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

When he was going to run on the Reform Party in 2000, he called himself pro-choice.


6 posted on 04/10/2024 11:13:23 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin; All

IT’S fun reading old articles before the press was covering up everything for Biden.

... Today he’s out condemning Trump about abortion.... let’s see!

“But his past opposition to most federal funding for abortion services is more striking than previously recognized, according to an NBC News review of his Senate voting record, and includes repeated examples of Biden rejecting exceptions for victims of rape and incest”

Biden voted against a 1977 compromise that allowed Medicaid to fund abortions that included exceptions for victims of rape and incest in addition to concerns for the life of the mother. While the rape and incest exceptions passed in that case, Biden voted in 1981 to again remove them, in what was the most far-reaching ban on federal funds ever enacted by Congress.
Biden also voted several times, including in 1983, to prohibit federal workers from using health insurance on abortion services, with only exception being to save life of the mother.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/biden-s-long-evolution-abortion-rights-still-holds-surprises-n1013846


7 posted on 04/10/2024 11:35:15 AM PDT by AuntB (Trump is our Ben Franklin - Brilliant, Boisterous, Brave and ALL AMERICAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Trump finally took the true constitutional conservative position....abortion is a states’ rights issue.

Republicans like Graham and Pence want to keep the abortion issue alive federally for the SAME REASON why the Democrats wants abortion to be a federal issue.....fundraising.

Bottom line, folks. Politicians from both parties want the issue so they can campaign on it.

It is the same reason why Democrats want gun control laws....so they can continue to say the laws are not tough enough and fundraise on the issue.


8 posted on 04/10/2024 11:46:39 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (This is the end of the Republic....because we could not keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Former President Trump announced he supports legalized premeditated murder (which is the leading cause of death in America), provided the states decide its okay.

That makes him a murderous Barbarian.
Anyone disagree?

Anyhow, for the little it’s worth, I never ever ever will vote for a murderous Barbarian.


9 posted on 04/10/2024 11:52:11 AM PDT by OVERTIME (Tammie Lee Haynes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

There should be no popular referendums on this. State courts and legislators can decide.


10 posted on 04/10/2024 12:05:19 PM PDT by Lisbon1940 (I don’t see why they would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OVERTIME

When you say is correct, but you might get bashed for saying it, and even banned from the web site.


11 posted on 04/10/2024 12:08:23 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Including partial birth abortions.


12 posted on 04/10/2024 12:18:56 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

Yes.


13 posted on 04/10/2024 12:21:43 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The Democrats have been in power for many many years where they could have codified abortion with legislation. However, they never did. The reason they never did is because the pro-life anti-abortion stance was a Republican issue. The Democrats have aways been a pro-abortion proponent.

Thus the abortion issue was never codified, because it could aways be used as a political issue. They could either use it as being a threat threat the Supreme Court would overturn it, if the Supreme Court trended conservative, or in he event that the Supreme Court actually did overturn it as they did with a somewhat Conservative Court. To be used as an issue to energize their base to turn out for elections.

People seem to think that the abortion issue is relatively new, but it isn't at all. It's been an issue that has been used numerous times over the decades when the conditions were ripe enough to be used effectively, because the threat was convincing enough to be employed.

14 posted on 04/10/2024 12:38:48 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Moderately pro-child killing....shhhh


15 posted on 04/10/2024 2:25:14 PM PDT by If You Want It Fixed - Fix It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson