Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Vows to Defend Its Sovereignty, Oppose SCOTUS Ruling
The New American ^ | January 23, 2024 | David Kelly

Posted on 01/23/2024 1:39:42 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton vowed to defend the sovereignty of the State of Texas after the U.S. Supreme Court issued an order on Monday permitting Border Patrol agents to resume destroying concertina wire barriers placed along the Rio Grande riverbank. 

The justices, by a 5-4 vote, granted the emergency appeal from the Biden administration which, according to the Patriot Post, argued “that Texas was — get this — preventing the Border Patrol from doing its duty. That duty, last we checked, was to keep illegals from entering the country.” 

“The Supreme Court’s temporary order allows Biden to continue his illegal effort to aid the foreign invasion of America,” Attorney General Paxton said in a press release on Monday. “The destruction of Texas’s border barriers will not help enforce the law or keep American citizens safe. This fight is not over, and I look forward to defending our state’s sovereignty.” 

Texas had placed the razor-wire fencing along the riverbank as part Governor Greg Abbott’s Operation Lone Star to offset President Biden’s “reckless open border policies” that created the ongoing border crisis, allowing record numbers of illegal immigrants and deadly drugs to pour into the nation. 

According to Epoch Times, the Biden administration argued before the high court:  

“Like other law-enforcement officers, Border Patrol agents operating under difficult circumstances at the border must make context-dependent, sometimes split-second decisions about how to enforce federal immigration laws while maintaining public safety,” Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar wrote to the Supreme Court. “But the injunction prohibits agents from passing through or moving physical obstacles erected by the State that prevent access to the very border they are charged with...


(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: border; illegalruling; invasion; nationalsecurity; security; sovereignty; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 01/23/2024 1:39:42 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

WHAT IS THE OVER/UNDER ON TEXAS SECEDING???


2 posted on 01/23/2024 1:41:06 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Unconstitutional rulings are not lawful. Just like the left ignores the constitution we should ignore illegal laws or rulings.


3 posted on 01/23/2024 1:41:06 PM PST by mikelets456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

…Let them enforce it.


4 posted on 01/23/2024 1:43:31 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
A new tweet on X (if that's the proper way to call it now) from @TheCalvinCooli1 [The Calvin Cooleidge Project] reports that the Texas National Guard is currently ADDING more razor wire to the Eagle Pass border crossing.

[Link]
Their source: Charlotte Cuthbertson, Epoch Times.

5 posted on 01/23/2024 1:43:57 PM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Texas should keep the barbed wire in place and offer to escort all Border Patrol personnel, assisting them in safely crossing the barrier to detain illegals and return them to Mexico.


6 posted on 01/23/2024 1:45:17 PM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Biden thumbs his nose at the supreme court, why shouldn’t governors do the same? If they are talking specifically about Eagle Pass, Abbott should tell them they won’t stop them from taking down the razor wire, but they won’t let them into the park, they can remove it from the river or Mexican side.


7 posted on 01/23/2024 1:45:24 PM PST by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

ACB was a disastrous pick. But she did fulfill the female quota.


8 posted on 01/23/2024 1:45:33 PM PST by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

“WHAT IS THE OVER/UNDER ON TEXAS SECEDING???”

A cabal of RINO’s in the Texas Legislature are actively preventing secession discussions from taking place.


9 posted on 01/23/2024 1:45:38 PM PST by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

In Marbury v. Madison the Supreme Court announced for the first time the principle that a court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the Constitution.

“All laws that are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”
Marbury v. Madison

That would also include SCOTUS.🤬


10 posted on 01/23/2024 1:47:09 PM PST by justme4now (Our Right's are God given and I don't need permission from politicians or courts to exercise them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

So what are the Feds going to do to enforce the order? Nationalize the Texas Guard and order them take down what they put up? Send in US Marshals or the army?


11 posted on 01/23/2024 1:48:31 PM PST by CedarDave (Pfizer's boosters: You just turned your immune system's functionality into a subscription service!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

Technically, SCOTUS ruled that the Border Patrol is allowed to remove razor wire. They didn’t stop Texas from re-installing or adding to the barriers already in place, right?


12 posted on 01/23/2024 1:49:08 PM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

If the FBI can ignore courts and refuse a judicial order to turn over Seth Rich’s laptop, and if Biden can ignore the Supreme Court ruling on student loans, then Texas has the exact same right to ignore court rulings as it sees fit.


13 posted on 01/23/2024 1:54:06 PM PST by DesertRhino (2016 Star Wars, 2020 The Empire Strikes Back, 2024... RETURN OF THE JEDI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Just keep piling on the Concertina wire.


14 posted on 01/23/2024 1:54:20 PM PST by Tommy Revolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

They should be planting landmines


15 posted on 01/23/2024 1:54:58 PM PST by mrmeyer (You can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him. Roberor thert Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A ridiculous ruling like this has me wondering if the the cartels have threatened some of the justices. Really.


16 posted on 01/23/2024 2:00:42 PM PST by Deo volente ("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Don’t give an inch, Texas !


17 posted on 01/23/2024 2:03:37 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Roberts and Barrett?


18 posted on 01/23/2024 2:07:46 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (THE ISSUE IS NEVER THE ISSUE. THE REVOLUTION IS THE ISSUE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikelets456

It was ruled by the SCOTUS.

Unless you are ready for CWII, then it is constitutional. Can still be wrong but constitutional.


19 posted on 01/23/2024 2:09:04 PM PST by redgolum (We are not going to make it, are we. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

For one thing. If I were Texas and the Fed actually succeeds, I’d make sure the whole damn state’s media is out there taking videos and pictures of the Fed ‘protecting our borders’ while they are cutting down razor wire. THEN, I’d make a bunch of campaign ads with them......


20 posted on 01/23/2024 2:11:38 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson