Posted on 01/19/2024 12:42:12 PM PST by libh8er
Dailymail.com was asked to leave Nikki Haley's meet-and-greet with voters in New Hampshire on Friday morning and was told it is banned from covering her future campaign events.
The ban came after DailyMail.com published a story Friday morning exclusively reporting that Haley falsely denied cheating on her husband when she was accused of engaging in two extramarital affairs during her 2010 South Carolina gubernatorial campaign.
The Haley campaign didn't respond to requests for comment on the story even though DailyMail.com gave them 24 hours to do so.
On Friday morning, a DailyMail.com reporter and photographer were asked to leave Haley's event at Mary Ann's Diner in Amherst, N.H., a public restaurant where the former South Carolina governor was talking to voters.
'Daily Mail is not credentialed for any more events. I'm politely asking you to leave,' Haley spokeswoman Chaney Denton said and pointed to the door.
Asked if this was in effect for the rest of the campaign, Denton answered 'yes.'
Denton later told an editor at DailyMail.com that the publication was banned for 'printing lies.'
Ironically, Haley took questions from the press at the event and spoke generically about attacks against her. Donald Trump has ramped up his criticism of her as she has risen in the polls.
'If people hit me, this is politics. For me it's not personal,' Haley said.
Shortly after the event, DailyMail.com's reporter ban was told the application for credentials for a rally in Manchester had been rejected.
'We apologize, but due to high volume of interest and limited space we CANNOT credential you for tonight’s event in Manchester, NH. Please do not attempt to attend, as you will be turned away at the door,' the email read.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Attaboy, Nimrata!
How Dare She?
Cheating on her Spouse and she bans Speech?
Just imagine what she would do if a Haley Administration was caught with their skirts up/pants down/yet to decide?
Falsley denied There's that term again. They used in it their earlier artice. Must be a British thing. Cause it makes no sense in English.
Her campaign doing this just extends the story.
If it’s a lie then she should sue.
“Her campaign doing this just extends the story.”
Both Nimrata and DeSantis, and their maniacal zeal for power, are destroying their political futures.
Courtship is a means of women assessing the qualities of men who want to marry them. Anger, phoniness and reactions to various stressors are revealed which were not shown on the first date or two.
Similar to courtship, the campaigns for President reveal yuge flaws in candidates like Haley. Learned before the inauguration.
On Kamala Harris— the people in primaries definitely rejected her. She did not win any of them and fell in popularity the more voters learned about her. She laid off “dozens” of complaining staff members. Polls in states showed her in the lowest single digits or “too low” for the poll. There was no path to victory (despite her attacks on Joe Biden.) and her funding was cut off by donors.
Thus, we could be stuck with a President after Biden is gone who never was wanted by the people.
It is a strange phrase. Meaning her denial was false? How do you prove a negative?
US media has a different way of claiming a negative assertion is true. Debunked; disproven, conspiracy theory etc.
I understood what it meant instantly...
So censoring the media?
I’m not a big fan of Haley, but I believe these allegations were investigated ten or so years ago and found to be false. I don’t remember all the details, but I believe it was a former employee who had some type of grudge against her. Many of the things he said happened were found impossible to have happened based upon provable events and alibis.
Bookmark
“Falsely denied”
It means her denial is a lie.
You took it to mean her denial was false? I think she truly denied it. Not the other way around.
Sounds like they did and often.
So what., if she did cheat. Don’t most Presidents do so. Did trump ever cheat? Is it really different for a woman. Also this is a British tabloid and they are not known for high journalist standards.
from the earlier edition:
“..New witnesses have come forward telling DailyMail.com that Haley’s denials of two alleged 2008 affairs are false, and that the supposed trysts were brazen and widely known among South Carolina politicos.
Will Folks, 49, and Larry Marchant, 61, both signed affidavits in 2010 alleging they had a sexual relationship with the then-South Carolina lawmaker, before she went on to become governor...”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.