Except for the “due process” part apparently.
See Colorado and Maine, where punishment was meted out just on a whim, without charge, trial or conviction, that is, process.
Just some people deciding and that was that.
If Trump is convicted, then we can discuss the 14th. As it stands he has not even been charged with insurrection. Therefore they can pound sand.
Then why ignore Section 5 of the 14th amendment?
5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.-PJ
“There’s a strange idea floating in the political ether.”
_________________________________________________
...and that strange idea comes from Chris Truax.
The Hill may as well be Media Matters.
This is gibberish cloaked with obfuscation about a possible ‘third term’ which is clearly defined and limited to two terms elected up to a 10 years maximum. The only recent possible occurrence of this could have been LBJ, who took over from assassinated JFK and could have run for election/reelection but he bowed out of a second term cuz Viet Nam.
Trump is due a second term and there has been no conviction of insurrection that would fall within the meaning of insurrection He is eligible, period. This idiot wants/urges otherwise. Screw him.
TDA at its finest.
Again, The Hill may as well be Media Matters!
Here’s the Left Loon author in 2019:
Republican: I’m telling Democrats how to beat Trump in 2020. It’s Job One so get over it.
Enough with the progressive wish lists, just focus on winning. The next president is everyone’s business, and we can’t afford to screw it up. Again.
Chris Truax Opinion columnist
July 2019
Mr Truax is is an appellate lawyer, and I am not. But may I point something out to him? When the 14th Amendment was proposed and ratified, there was no doubt in anyone’s mind that from 1861–1865 a violent insurrection had, in fact, occurred resulting in 100s of thousands of deaths.
It must amaze Mr. Truax, appellate lawyer, that there 10s of millions of Americans who do not believe that the events during the late hours of January 6, 2021, constituted an ‘insurrection’ at all therefore rendering the 14th Amendment clause in question moot.
So who gets to decide? MSNBC? CNN? The Maine Sec’y of State? Or perhaps the fine folks at Guardrails of Democracy Project?
That’s begging the question, which is whether the 14th Amendment is relevant at all here.
If CHRIS TRUAX wants to respect the US Constitution, then he should read it.
Well, IIRC, joementia has already informed us those pesky amendments are NOT absolute so............
Don’t tell me what I “must” do. I decide what I will and won’t do, like read this tripe.
Hey Chrissie. If you respect the Constitution, you must respect enforcement of the FIRST AND SECOND AMENDMENTS TOO. It ain’t happening in your Amerika, sonny.
How about the original 10, especially the 1st,the 2nd and the 10th?
I’m sure this imbecile fully respects them.
Section 1 of the 14th amendment is the due process clause and prohibits states from denying citizens their rights without due process.
President Trump was charged with, and ACQUITED of the charge of Insurrection during his second impeachment. Just because a judge says that a person committed a crime is not due process and it does not make them guilty. Further, the 5th amendment’s double jeopardy clause prohibits Trump for being prosecuted twice for the same charge.
You must respect the whole and entire constitution.
Could you imagine republicans messing with the ballots? Voter disenfranchisement, Summer of Lover 2020 Redux
The Constitutionally Repugnant Reconstruction Acts Imposed the 14th Amendment via
Martial Law Powers In Time of Peace
https://states.americanstatenationals.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/AnnasReformatofGeoffreysTimeLineResearch.pdf
What a lot of bunk. It is easily established whether a person is 35 years or older or not, or if a president has served two full terms. Unfortunately that natural born citizen part has been allowed to go out into the fog. Trump hasn’t been indicted much less convicted of insurrection. Has anyone? If he is ever convicted, then we can talk.
Does anyone know how this was applied to former Confederate officials? I know that James Longstreet, among others, was indicted for treason. Gen. Grant objected to this, saying they were exempt from such prosecution by the terms of surrender. He convinced Andrew Johnson to get the Justice Department to drop the charges. Now, here we had an actual insurrection, and Longstreet was an important part of it, and yet he sought high federal positions, such as Secretary of the Navy and U.S. Marshal, and was actually appointed as Marshal for Georgia and Minister to the Ottoman Empire.
TRUMP HAS NOT VIOLATED THE 14th AMENDMENT A$$HOLE!