The government seeks this Court’s resolution of the immunity claim so that those charges may be promptly resolved
I'm not a lawyer, but if the government takes 3+ years to make an inditement why should the SCOTUS go outside normal methodology resolve "as expeditiously as possible."
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Jerk Smith hears the footsteps approaching on his unconstitutional "appointment" by Gauleiter Garland.
2 posted on
12/21/2023 10:54:00 PM PST by
kiryandil
(The Biden: "Zelensky, we need to sit down and have a talk.")
To: where's_the_Outrage?
As [Jerk] Smith was hired directly by current AG Merrick Garland, the correct constitutional process of appointment by the President, and confirmation by the full U.S. Senate never took place. . . . the various legal actions undertaken by [Jerk] Smith under color of law “can be taken only by persons properly appointed as federal officers to properly created federal offices. Neither [Jerk] Smith nor the position of Special Counsel under which he purportedly acts meets those criteria.
3 posted on
12/21/2023 10:55:37 PM PST by
kiryandil
(The Biden: "Zelensky, we need to sit down and have a talk.")
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Some people may not agree with this, but I see the same things
in Jack Smith’s face, that I see in Schiff’s face.
They both have that half-crazed “mental” look to them.
Before this is over Jack Smith is going to be totally
discredited. (I know he already is to some of us, but
I’m talking broadly in the public.
4 posted on
12/21/2023 11:14:09 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(I pledge allegiance to the flag of the USofA & to the Constitutional REPUBLIC for which it stands.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Anyone know anything abt Jack Smith and his EXTORTION case?
8 posted on
12/22/2023 2:23:34 AM PST by
Singermom
To: where's_the_Outrage?
I'm not a lawyer, but if the government takes 3+ years to make an inditement why should the SCOTUS go outside normal methodology resolve "as expeditiously as possible."
Only to restore the democratic process by ruling in favor of the President Donald Trump (and every president after him)
10 posted on
12/22/2023 3:18:01 AM PST by
af_vet_1981
( The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began)
To: All
11 posted on
12/22/2023 3:44:49 AM PST by
escapefromboston
(Peace, commerce and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Smith is nothing less than an attack political hack. A disgrace to the legal profession.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
I read this as Smith is desperate.
16 posted on
12/22/2023 5:39:55 AM PST by
sauropod
(The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
If jerk Smith is found to be operating outside the law by not being lawfully appointed, doesn’t that open him up to CRIMINAL PROSECUTION for his Illegal Actions? And doesn’t Trump then have a rock solid case for Deprivation of Rights against every person involved?
If the Supreme Court reversed it’s fictitious “Qualified Immunity” dictate, Trump could then CLEAN ALL THEIR CLOCKS and Bankrupt every person involved..
17 posted on
12/22/2023 6:04:38 AM PST by
eyeamok
To: where's_the_Outrage?
The charges here are of the utmost gravity The charges are laughable. Smith takes his assertion seriously and contends that we all should take them seriously. Smith is nothing more than a small man who thinks highly of himself.
His first mistake is thinking that his law degree actually means something. It doesn't. I have encountered enough lawyers in my life, who are some of the most stupid people imaginable. I do not consider a J.D. degree to be anything more than toilet paper.
18 posted on
12/22/2023 6:25:39 AM PST by
Ouderkirk
(The modern world demands that we approve what it should not even dare ask us to tolerate.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Smith and his team are emotional about Trump. It leads to mistakes. His leap to SCOTUS instead of the appellate courts is an error.
22 posted on
12/22/2023 7:10:24 AM PST by
lurk
(u)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
I’m not a lawyer either; but if these are crimes committed while President Trump was still in office, isn’t the proper procedure to impeach him?
23 posted on
12/22/2023 7:12:19 AM PST by
NTHockey
(My rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Jackboot Smith, You are misguided, you shyster.
25 posted on
12/22/2023 11:11:45 AM PST by
Shady
(The Force of Liberty must prevail for the sake of our Children and Grandchildren...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson