JUST IN: Jack Smith Hits Back at Trump In Scathing Respone Against Delaying Supreme Court Immunity Appeal

Mediaite ^ | Dec 21, 2023 | Tommy Christopher

[where's_the_Outrage?]

The government seeks this Court’s resolution of the immunity claim so that those charges may be promptly resolved

I'm not a lawyer, but if the government takes 3+ years to make an inditement why should the SCOTUS go outside normal methodology resolve "as expeditiously as possible."

[kiryandil]

Jerk Smith hears the footsteps approaching on his unconstitutional "appointment" by Gauleiter Garland.

[kiryandil]

As [Jerk] Smith was hired directly by current AG Merrick Garland, the correct constitutional process of appointment by the President, and confirmation by the full U.S. Senate never took place. . . . the various legal actions undertaken by [Jerk] Smith under color of law “can be taken only by persons properly appointed as federal officers to properly created federal offices. Neither [Jerk] Smith nor the position of Special Counsel under which he purportedly acts meets those criteria.

[DoughtyOne]

Some people may not agree with this, but I see the same things
in Jack Smith’s face, that I see in Schiff’s face.

They both have that half-crazed “mental” look to them.

Before this is over Jack Smith is going to be totally
discredited. (I know he already is to some of us, but
I’m talking broadly in the public.

[Gene Eric]

that would be nice and well deserved

[Jess Kitting]

Yes. Jack Smith has no standing or constitutional authority to make accusations against Trump.

He was not appointed through constitutional processes, and his "special counsel" was not approved by the President / Congress.

Special counsel in Trump case unconstitutional, former Reagan AG says

[Cobra64]

Yup. He’s another one that needs to disappear.

[Singermom]

Anyone know anything abt Jack Smith and his EXTORTION case?

[RoosterRedux]

Agreed. We can look right through their eyes into their black souls.

[af_vet_1981]

I'm not a lawyer, but if the government takes 3+ years to make an inditement why should the SCOTUS go outside normal methodology resolve "as expeditiously as possible."

Only to restore the democratic process by ruling in favor of the President Donald Trump (and every president after him)

[escapefromboston]

“Scathing”

[From The Deer Stand]

Smith is nothing less than an attack political hack. A disgrace to the legal profession.

[MMusson]

Unfortunately, delaying the ruling until after the election is a way for the SCOTUS to avoid having to do their job. And, that is exactly what the Chief Justice would like most.
What a knob.

[Rlsau1]

There’s a big payday for Jack in the future. The left/deep state always takes care of the folks who do their dirty work.

[nonliberal]

Ed Meese is still alive? Wow. Great AG. Glad to see he’s still among the living.

[sauropod]

I read this as Smith is desperate.

[eyeamok]

If jerk Smith is found to be operating outside the law by not being lawfully appointed, doesn’t that open him up to CRIMINAL PROSECUTION for his Illegal Actions? And doesn’t Trump then have a rock solid case for Deprivation of Rights against every person involved?

If the Supreme Court reversed it’s fictitious “Qualified Immunity” dictate, Trump could then CLEAN ALL THEIR CLOCKS and Bankrupt every person involved..

[Ouderkirk]

The charges here are of the utmost gravity

The charges are laughable. Smith takes his assertion seriously and contends that we all should take them seriously. Smith is nothing more than a small man who thinks highly of himself.

His first mistake is thinking that his law degree actually means something. It doesn't. I have encountered enough lawyers in my life, who are some of the most stupid people imaginable. I do not consider a J.D. degree to be anything more than toilet paper.

[princess leah]

Meanwhile there are hundreds of J6 prisoners languishing in the DC goulag and NO sense of fair trial for any of them.

[Behind Liberal Lines]

I’m actually a little shocked at the news that Smith wasn’t already a DoJ employee when Meritless Garland appointed him. I was all but certain that was a requirement to be appointed special counsel, for the very reasons Meese cites. This seems as if MG just revived out of thin air the expired “special prosecutor” statute from the 90s.