Posted on 12/12/2023 6:04:40 AM PST by Red Badger
Special Counsel Jack Smith will use Trump’s phone data at his January 6 trial in DC according to a new court filing reviewed by The Gateway Pundit.
In September Trump was hit with 4 counts in Jack Smith’s January 6 case up in DC: Conspiracy to defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempt to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against rights.
According to the court filing, Jack Smith will call in an expert to testify on Trump’s phone data and location on January 6, 2021.
The expert witness has reportedly “extracted and processed data” from Trump’s phones and “one other individual.”
“Expert 1 has knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education beyond the ordinary lay person regarding the interpretation and visual representation of geographic location data. The Government expects that Expert 1 will testify about his/her use of ArcGIS (Geographic Information Systems) software to create a map of the Google location history data produced in response to a search warrant,” Jack Smith’s prosecutor Molly Gaston wrote in the filing reviewed by this reporter.
“Specifically, Expert 1 plotted the location history data for Google accounts and devices associated with individuals who moved, on January 6, 2021, from an area at or near the Ellipse to an area encompassing the United States Capitol building. His/her testimony will describe and explain the resulting graphical representations of that data, and it will aid the jury in understanding the movements of individuals toward the Capitol area during and after the defendant’s speech at the Ellipse,” the federal prosecutor wrote.
The expert witness will also determine when and where Trump was when he used Twitter at the US Capitol on January 6, 2021.
“Expert 3 has knowledge, skill, experience, training, and education beyond the ordinary lay person regarding the analysis of cellular phone data, including the use of Twitter and other applications on cell phones. The Government expects that Expert 3 will testify that he/she: (1) extracted and processed data from the White House cell phones used by the defendant and one other individual (Individual 1); (2) reviewed and analyzed data on the defendant’s phone and on Individual 1’s phone, including analyzing images found on the phones and websites visited; (3) determined the usage of these phones throughout the post-election period, including on and around January 6, 2021; and (4) specifically identified the periods of time during which the defendant’s phone was unlocked and the Twitter application was open on January 6,” the prosecutor wrote.
Additionally, Jack Smith on Monday asked the US Supreme Court to weigh in on Trump’s immunity claims.
On Monday, Jack Smith skipped over the appellate court and went straight to the US Supreme Court on Trump’s immunity claims:
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office or is constitutionally protected from federal prosecution when he has been impeached but not convicted before the criminal proceedings begin.
“This case presents a fundamental question at the heart of our democracy: whether a former President is absolutely immune from federal prosecution for crimes committed while in office,” Smith wrote in the Monday filing.
You mean 1/8/21. It might have been 1/9/21 in Tokyo.
Not if your name is "Donald J Trump"
Has anyone collected the data from commieguvjacksmith’s PHONES ?
If You use that pic again PLEASE PUT A PUKE WARNING ON IT FIRST. That a definitely a FUGLY ALERT !!!
The point is to taint him with a conviction. Any conviction will do.
It won’t change your vote for Trump, but it’s likely to change a lot of other people’s minds if he gets convicted. Even if the conviction gets overturned later, it will likely be too late.
The information transmitted by this phone call is intended only for the person or entity to which was called. This phone call may contain proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this phone call, be aware that any use, review, retransmission, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this phone call is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers.
”Hi Dear, working late, don’t wait up for me…..”
I M M U N E
The only truthful words I have heard from a politician’s mouth recently was MTG’s when she was on Tucker. She basically said all of the politicians are on the take and could care less about the country.
Don’t forget about bathhouse Barry, Gyorgy Schwartz and the Clinton crime cartel.
I imagine that the jury has already been picked.
Torquemada would give Trump a much fairer trial than Smith.
Silly me thought doing such was illegal on several levels.
Why would you think that?
93% of the jury pool are unlikely to care about proof. But they will swallow Smith's interpretation.
I would guess they are looking for a call between Trump and somebody who broke a window or carried an axe or something.
Seems to me that spying on a sitting President by bureaucrats would be an extreme national security risk.
Shouldn’t the SS or the U.S. Marshall’s Service be making some arrests?
more than dozens...
Well, he should have hit it with a hammer or wiped it with a cloth..
They’re probably trying to create a linkage between him and someone who may have called him who was at the capitol, but will spin it as Trump must have been giving orders to whoever called.
The guy on the line could be an informant or an actor placing a call on Pelosi’s behalf, to create a record to exploit later, for all we know.
Or this could relate to kooky Cassidy Hutchinson’s claims regarding things she claims she heard from others she thought she recognized, etc.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.