Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Not sure I'm understanding this correctly, is the judge saying preserving election integrity is more important than proving election fraud?
1 posted on 11/30/2023 7:23:58 PM PST by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: where's_the_Outrage?
concluding it "would have a corrosive effect on public confidence in the electoral process."

Eff this skeezy rigged-"elections" banana republic that we live in.


2 posted on 11/30/2023 7:30:17 PM PST by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
What the judge is saying is that discovery that some of the signatures are fraudulent would undermine the public's confidance in the electoral process.

Sort of the point isn't it?

3 posted on 11/30/2023 7:30:50 PM PST by facedown (uite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The judicial system in AZ is fubar’d.

It has the McCain corruption infestation.


4 posted on 11/30/2023 7:31:12 PM PST by Boomer (The Long Winter is coming...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Kari Lake's request to review ballot envelope signatures, concluding it "would have a corrosive effect on public confidence in the electoral process."

WTF? I think ruling the way he did corrodes public confidence even more because it appears the judge fears that some ballot/vote tampering did occur.

This ruling erode public confidence in the voting process; this is just another nail in that confidence coffin. I fear for this Republic.

5 posted on 11/30/2023 7:31:15 PM PST by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The corrupt courts have me convinced that vote fraud has been happening for a long time. Long enough to make sure they had the corrupt judges needed to keep the fake elections in place.


6 posted on 11/30/2023 7:31:39 PM PST by Nateman (If the Pedo Profit Mad Moe (pig pee upon him!) was not the Antichrist then he comes in second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
concluding it "would have a corrosive effect on public confidence in the electoral process."

Uhm....so...uhm....yeah...well maybe, just maybe...uhm...may I dare suggest...the elections be conducted in an honest transparent way???

7 posted on 11/30/2023 7:32:24 PM PST by AndyTheBear (Certified smarter than average for my species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

“An Arizona judge on Wednesday denied 2022 Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake’s request to review ballot envelope signatures, concluding it “would have a corrosive effect on public confidence in the electoral process.””

Cannot review the process for fraud. That would corrode public trust. Quite an amazing admission. One would think it would strengthen trust.... unless of course....


8 posted on 11/30/2023 7:35:31 PM PST by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Judge -- "would have a corrosive effect on public confidence in the electoral process."

LOLOLOL....pant, pant, pant...ROFLOL.

He's nuts. There is ZERO public confidence today. Can you corrode a ZERO?

10 posted on 11/30/2023 7:36:18 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom (“Occupy your mind with good thoughts or your enemy will fill them with bad ones.” ~ Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

She’s saying 17,000 ballots are no good. She wants to see for herself if the match. I saw the process and how they reviewed them and how ballots were resolved. IMHO....Kari should be concentrating on her run...I think Sinema is going to clobber her. Kari’s experience...”0”.


11 posted on 11/30/2023 7:36:21 PM PST by Sacajaweau ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

No, he is saying the dems have a good thing going. Proof of election fraud that might lead people to believe that elections are rigged.

That is the corrosive slope of insurrection.

Imagine for example that the covid VAX were proven to be unsafe and ineffective, the mental health effects on the sheep would foment distrust unrest and unhappiness.


12 posted on 11/30/2023 7:36:51 PM PST by algore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Wait, if this proved things were correct, wouldn’t that prove the election was legit? The ruling suggests the judge knows it was stolen.


15 posted on 11/30/2023 7:38:47 PM PST by ChinaGotTheGoodsOnClinton (Dems: We cheated fair and square!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Being able to review ballot signatures “would have a corrosive effect on public confidence in the electoral process." ?

Other likely pearls of wisdom from this genius:

Allowing diners enough light to see their food would have a corrosive effect on their satisfaction with their meal.

Permitting prospective car buyers to test drive cars would have a corrosive effect on sales of certain models of cars.

Requiring periodic audits of banks would have a corrosive effect on public faith in some banks.

And to come full circle: Requiring government transparency would have a corrosive effect on public confidence in their elected officials.

16 posted on 11/30/2023 7:38:53 PM PST by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

[[ it “would have a corrosive effect on public confidence in the electoral process.”]]

Judge must be a mind reader- but he sucks at it as many have stated that they want FAIR elections and a transparent process!


17 posted on 11/30/2023 7:39:57 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
concluding it "would have a corrosive effect on public confidence in the electoral process."

Keeping the process opaque has a corrosive effect on public confidence in the electoral process.
18 posted on 11/30/2023 7:40:14 PM PST by Dr. Sivana ("If you can’t say something nice . . . say the Rosary." [Red Badger])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Not sure I'm understanding this correctly, is the judge saying preserving election integrity is more important than proving election fraud?

The gist of it is that letting the loser of an election check to see the names of people who voted for the winner amounts to a means to collect the names of voters, which allows the losing candidate to harass those voters.

I understand that part, but by denying any sort of validation check on the ballots, there's no way for the losing party to have confidence that they lost fairly.

The winning party and the bureaucrats affiliated with the losing party don't have a problem with the losing party not having confidence in the elections. It actually serves their purpose better if they stay home and don't vote.

The problem really isn't really whether or not Kari Lake lost fair and square, but that the dems see no reason to look into the claims of fraud and prove it because they don't believe they'll ever end up on the other end of this problem.

19 posted on 11/30/2023 7:40:33 PM PST by jz638
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

20 posted on 11/30/2023 7:42:12 PM PST by for-q-clinton (Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Nothing corrodes public confidence quite like an obvious cover-up.


21 posted on 11/30/2023 7:43:43 PM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Do not worry “your honor”, this election has had a MAJOR CORROSIVE EFFECT on the process.

Jackass


25 posted on 11/30/2023 7:47:23 PM PST by eyedigress (Trump is my President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
An Arizona judge on Wednesday denied 2022 Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake's request to review ballot envelope signatures, concluding it "would have a corrosive effect on public confidence in the electoral process."

Seems the judge is admitting that there's trouble with the signatures ?
Judge must be Lace-curtain Irish. It's about how it looks rather than what is legal, lawful and correct.
26 posted on 11/30/2023 7:51:28 PM PST by stylin19a (Back when men cursed & beat the ground with sticks, it was named witchcraft. Today it's named golf.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

He’s saying that preserving the ILLUSION of election integrity is more important.

Hannah is a weirdo from LA who couldn’t get into a California law school so he got into the U of A law school instead and unfortunately stuck around Arizona, where he comes up with decisions like this using inverted logic, which is normal for the weird, weird world of the LA basin.


28 posted on 11/30/2023 7:54:51 PM PST by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson