The most important thing here is, you want to help Mark, buy his signed Liberty Stick and whack the first Libtard you see.
Posted on 11/04/2023 4:19:28 AM PDT by RandFan
@DVATW
Mark Steyn has been a brave and courageous voice for many years. He has suffered several cardiac incidents since taking the jabs and appears to be white in the hair and confined to a wheelchair. This is very sad to see and I hope he can recover.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Excuse me? Ask an AI for information about anything? What next, consult the Oracle of Delphi?
Ask ChatGBT.
Excuse me? Ask an AI for information about anything? What next, consult the Oracle of Delphi?
__________________________
....or, like asking your hero faucie. But I digress
I know, and I am well aware that I can do little to reach people who are so mired in conspiracy thinking that they see the entire world through a dark malicious prism.
They are not my primary target, even though I use their posts and the misinformation they post as a means of providing accurate scientific information. My goal is to reach those people who might read antivax propaganda and think it is valid. I want to present them with the facts and links to either organizations like CDC/Mayo clinic/etc. which translate highly technical science to ordinary language, or to the original medical literature. I don't want people to ONLY see the propaganda without any rebuttal from the scientific community.
Plus, doing this is educational. Debunking the propaganda has led me to finding a number of scientific articles which I probably wouldn't have found or read otherwise. I even found a diagram of the plasmid (DNA) used to make the Pfizer vaccine--something I've been very curious about, as I've made countless plasmids for other purposes.
Thank you for your post. Clearly illuminates the gaslighting coming from this clot shot advocate.
Based on what do you make your assumption
Spin this:
STUNNING: Dr. Deborah Birx Admits That Vaccine Efficacy Claims Were Based on ‘Hope,’ Not Science
BTW, Can you remind me, how many times has the “esteemed” Dr. Jill Biden contracted covid? I’ve lost count. And how many times has her “esteemed” husban claimed that if you get the vaccine you won’t catch covid, you won’t be hospitalized and you won’t die?
The most important thing here is, you want to help Mark, buy his signed Liberty Stick and whack the first Libtard you see.
Hi Dingbat.
Remember maybe a week ago, where I posted someone mocking a ChatGPT saying the Dr. Malone had begun pushing the jabs, and you didn't even notice the mockery or ChatGPT, and name-dropped about Malone and said you'd have to check into it?
And then doubled down, and said you'd been on a first-name basis with him?
And then had to back down after you also started calling him a kook, until I pointed out you can't have it both ways?
If these clot shots are truly safe and effective, why the censorship? Why such lack of transparency? Why have government personell and elected officials been exposed using the tyrannical strong arm to silence debate?
Why are FACTS such as the following data been scrubbed from search engines forcing the truth to be found only on free speech platforms?
After Forcing The CDC To Release V-SAFE Data, Excessive COVID Vaccine Injuries Are Made Public!
On behalf of ICAN, vaccine and civil rights attorney Aaron Siri sued the CDC to get their V-SAFE data. V-Safe is a new smartphone-based CDC program that allows users to register after getting a Covid-19 vaccine and provide health check-ins. Why did it take 463 days for the CDC to release this important data?
“Now that we have [the V-SAFE data] and we’ve looked at that data, of the 10 million users within V-SAFE, 7.7 percent of them had to seek medical care after vaccination. This is an incredibly high percentage!”
“Now that we have the data we can see that getting the vaccine caused 25 percent of people who got the shot, within this dataset of 10 million people, to miss work.”
— Aaron Siri
Check out the alarming V-SAFE data here:
https://www.icandecide.org/v-safe-data/
Original FoxNews Video:
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6313218294112
See Also:
ICAN Attorney Aaron Siri Breaks Down CDC’s V-Safe Data (The Highwire)
https://rumble.com/v1nrusi-ican-attorney-aaron-siri-breaks-down-cdcs-v-safe-data-the-highwire.html
Why Did The CDC Hide The V-Safe Data From The American People For Almost 2 Years?
Because it clearly shows that these vaccines are the most dangerous vaccines we’ve ever created, that’s why.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/why-did-the-cdc-hide-the-v-safe-data
“The V-safe data shows that 33.1% of the people who got the vaccine suffered from a significant adverse event and 7.7% had to seek professional medical care. These are extraordinary numbers. They clearly show the vaccines are unsafe, that the CDC deliberately hid this information from the American public, and that the drug companies falsified the data in the trials...”
..............
V-Safe
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafe.html
Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN)
https://www.icandecide.org/
The Highwire:
https://thehighwire.com/
Covid-19 Vaccine Pharmacovigilance Report
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/covid-19-vaccine-pharmacovigilance-report/
More Than 1,000 Peer Reviewed Articles On COVID Vaccine Injuries
https://community.covidvaccineinjuries.com/compilation-peer-reviewed-medical-papers-of-covid-vaccine-injuries/
COVID-19 Vaccination Stories, Side Effects & Healing
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-vaccination-stories-side-effects-healing/
COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Event Tracking System (VAERS)
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-vaers/
COVID-19 Vaccine Bad Batches Reference Page
https://sunfellow.com/100-of-covid-19-vaccine-deaths-were-caused-by-just-5-of-the-batches/
Increasing Death Rates, Plummeting Birth Rates, Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS)
https://sunfellow.com/increasing-death-rates-plummeting-birth-rates-sudden-adult-death-syndrome-sads/
COVID-19 - Mystery Clots In Vaccinated Deceased People
https://sunfellow.com/covid19-blood-clots-in-vaccinated-dead-people/
COVID-19 & Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE)
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-antibody-dependent-enhancement-ade/
After Forcing The CDC To Release V-SAFE Data, Excessive COVID Vaccine Injuries Are Made Public!
Sunfellow On COVID-19
59.8K followers
Follow
907
17
Comments
Share
Embed
1 year ago
1.18M
On behalf of ICAN, vaccine and civil rights attorney Aaron Siri sued the CDC to get their V-SAFE data. V-Safe is a new smartphone-based CDC program that allows users to register after getting a Covid-19 vaccine and provide health check-ins. Why did it take 463 days for the CDC to release this important data?
“Now that we have [the V-SAFE data] and we’ve looked at that data, of the 10 million users within V-SAFE, 7.7 percent of them had to seek medical care after vaccination. This is an incredibly high percentage!”
“Now that we have the data we can see that getting the vaccine caused 25 percent of people who got the shot, within this dataset of 10 million people, to miss work.”
— Aaron Siri
Check out the alarming V-SAFE data here:
https://www.icandecide.org/v-safe-data/
Original FoxNews Video:
https://www.foxnews.com/video/6313218294112
See Also:
ICAN Attorney Aaron Siri Breaks Down CDC’s V-Safe Data (The Highwire)
https://rumble.com/v1nrusi-ican-attorney-aaron-siri-breaks-down-cdcs-v-safe-data-the-highwire.html
Why Did The CDC Hide The V-Safe Data From The American People For Almost 2 Years?
Because it clearly shows that these vaccines are the most dangerous vaccines we’ve ever created, that’s why.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/why-did-the-cdc-hide-the-v-safe-data
“The V-safe data shows that 33.1% of the people who got the vaccine suffered from a significant adverse event and 7.7% had to seek professional medical care. These are extraordinary numbers. They clearly show the vaccines are unsafe, that the CDC deliberately hid this information from the American public, and that the drug companies falsified the data in the trials...”
..............
V-Safe
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/vsafe.html
Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN)
https://www.icandecide.org/
The Highwire:
https://thehighwire.com/
..............
Covid-19 Vaccine Pharmacovigilance Report
https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources/covid-19-vaccine-pharmacovigilance-report/
More Than 1,000 Peer Reviewed Articles On COVID Vaccine Injuries
https://community.covidvaccineinjuries.com/compilation-peer-reviewed-medical-papers-of-covid-vaccine-injuries/
COVID-19 Vaccination Stories, Side Effects & Healing
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-vaccination-stories-side-effects-healing/
COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Event Tracking System (VAERS)
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-vaers/
COVID-19 Vaccine Bad Batches Reference Page
https://sunfellow.com/100-of-covid-19-vaccine-deaths-were-caused-by-just-5-of-the-batches/
Increasing Death Rates, Plummeting Birth Rates, Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS)
https://sunfellow.com/increasing-death-rates-plummeting-birth-rates-sudden-adult-death-syndrome-sads/
COVID-19 - Mystery Clots In Vaccinated Deceased People
https://sunfellow.com/covid19-blood-clots-in-vaccinated-dead-people/
COVID-19 & Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE)
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-antibody-dependent-enhancement-ade/
Covid-19 – Vaccine-Induced T Cell Suppression, Virus Activation, Cancer, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s
https://sunfellow.com/bhakdi-burkhardt-cole-hoffe/
COVID-19 Menstrual & Breast Milk Disruptions, Miscarriages, Infertility, Transmission (Shedding)
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-menstrual-breast-milk-disruptions-miscarriages-infertility-transmission-shedding/
COVID-19 Magnetism, Graphene Oxide, UV Fluorescence
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-magnetism-graphene-oxide-uv-fluorescence/
COVID-19 Healing Resources
https://sunfellow.com/covid-19-healing-resources/
Censored, Sidelined And Villainized Doctors, Nurses, Health Care Workers Describe Their COVID-19 Experiences
https://sunfellow.com/censored-health-care-workers-describe-their-covid-experiences/
You might want to give it a try. It’s pretty good with basic statistical information
What goes around comes around.
Back in 2021 every unexpected death was said to have been caused by COVID-19. Even numerous fatal car and motorcycle accidents were so categorized. Deaths from gunshots were attributed to COVID. It was so ridiculous.
There was a massive disinformation campaign since January 2020 to terrify people into accepting the mRNA treatment. That campaign worked. An estimated 70%-80% of the American population took the jab.
"History never repeats itself. But it does often rhyme" (Mark Twain)
So now we have been swinging in exactly the opposite direction. I get it. That is a problem. Not everybody will die from the jab. It is a mistake to automatically attribute the unexpected deaths of teen-aged and twenty-something athletes to the jab. They are far more likely to perish in automobile accidents.
Only about 0.2% will die directly within 30 days from the mRNA treatment. Only about 3% will suffer permanent disabilities or early death. No big deal, right? We can just ignore the actuarial studies that are leaking out of the insurance companies. The insurance companies are ignoring them, aren't they?
Well, no they are not. They are raising rates and adjusting life expectancy tables to account for the "excess mortality" of the last three years. They know the differential mortality rates between the "vaxxed" and "unvaxxed" populations to four decimal places. SPOILER: The "unvaxxed" in the 16–49-year-old population have lower mortality than the "vaxxed".
Miscarriages from military wives have increased 600% in the last three years. Nearly all of these unfortunate women were persuaded to take the jab. The rate of miscarriages for un-jabbed women has not changed substantially in the last five years.
"Something's happening here. What it is ain't exactly clear" (Buffalo Springfield)
The mRNA treatment is NOT A VACCINE. Calling it a vaccine does not make it a vaccine. It is a "temporary" genetic modification to the body which is supposed to stimulate an immune system response to prevent or treat COVID.
And it does not work. The jab does not prevent COVID, the jab does not lessen symptoms of COVID, the jab does not prevent people from spreading COVID. It is also clear that that people who accept repeated booster treatments are more likely to get COVID again.
People who refuse to take the jab or to take the boosters are acting on well-founded observations and asessments.
“terrified to face the reality of what they have done to themselves by acceding to this poison.”
Many who took the shots are in denial. My husband developed shot related auto immune neuropathy; unlike many, he is willing to admit it. I did not take the shot but wonder if I was infected with manmade spike proteins from him.
Hey, it is great money maker for cardiologists.
My body grew new arteries in heart with regular exercise.
It is natural bypass! In my 50’s I had chest pains often. They did tests and found my heart arteries were partially blocked. now 30 years later no chest pains and my heart is as healthy as 30 year old.
Re: 131 - regarding getting paid to refute antivax comments, etc. I believe such claims are often by ignorant posters on the Internet, or posters on the Internet that simply do not have the intellectual capacity to reason and discern information.
Exdemmom will return shortly after acute treatment for adverse effects from covid vaccine injures.........in the mean time, enjoy a word from our sponsors Phizer...
Small hint for future reference:
Conspiracy and antivax/anti-science sites are not credible sources of scientific information.
...that have caused me to become very bitter at those who make “appeals to authority” in their posts here yet include little or no information that has any value.
Links to scientific studies published in the medical literature are not, in fact, "appeals to authority." They are direct links to the pertinent information. Your inability to read and understand the medical/scientific literature does not constitute a failure to provide information on my part.
one would think that you might be upset by peer reviewed evidence showed that the studies used to get the emergency use authorizations (EUA) by Pfizer excluded data and were doctored
You don't really understand what peer-reviewed evidence is or how to recognize it, do you?
Your only "proof" that any Pfizer studies were "doctored" consists of a link to The Epoch Times. While I would be willing to read a conspiratorial "news" site in order to find the original studies the conspiracists misrepresented, The Epoch Times informs me that I have read my limit of articles and will have to subscribe to read any more. Yeah, that's not happening.
Groups like The Epoch Times get away with making claims of hidden data, etc., because they know that their readers are not inclined to do their own research and don't know how to find the information anyway. So let me help you out a bit with actual links:
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.
This FDA web page contains links to several documents. I would draw your attention to the "Fact sheet" link for healthcare providers and the "Decision memorandum" issued Sept 11, 2023. These are both highly technical documents which contain information about the clinical trials, vaccine formulation, supporting studies published in the medical literature, etc. These are not light reading; the fact sheet is 60 pages and the decision memo is 37 pages. And the links and references provided within the documents add many more pages of information.
Clinicaltrials.gov This is a searchable database of registered clinical trials. You can search for a trial on any subject you like. I searched for "Covid-19" "mRNA" and "vaccine" and found 322 studies. Hmm, if "big pharma" were trying to hide stuff, they wouldn't put it in a searchable database for anyone to find it, would they?
Pubmed search for "covid vaccine." This search turned up over 64 thousand results. The search can always be refined by adding search terms such as "side effects" or "efficacy", etc.
We have both been advocates for the use of vaccines to save lives.
I very often see such claims inserted into the same old same old antivax rhetoric that has been around for the last 200 years. Even that statement is suspiciously similar to the statement "We're not against vaccines, we're just FOR safe vaccines" that has been said ad nauseum during previous antivax campaigns. So, let's just say that I suspect that use of such language is an attempt to be disingenuous.
I found this article published in Newsweek in Feb 2019: 9 Anti-Vaxxer Myths Debunked.
Amazing. Every antivaxxer myth in that article is said almost unchanged about the Covid vaccines. (The claim about Covid vaccine is that it substitutes "turbo-cancer" or something similar for "autism.")
Links to scientific studies published in the medical literature are not, in fact, “appeals to authority.” They are direct links to the pertinent information. Your inability to read and understand the medical/scientific literature does not constitute a failure to provide information on my part.
one would think that you might be upset by peer reviewed evidence showed that the studies used to get the emergency use authorizations (EUA) by Pfizer excluded data and were doctored
You don’t really understand what peer-reviewed evidence is or how to recognize it, do you?
__________________________________
More Than 1,000 Peer Reviewed Articles On COVID Vaccine Injuries
Clinicaltrials.gov This is a searchable database of registered clinical trials. You can search for a trial on any subject you like. I searched for “Covid-19” “mRNA” and “vaccine” and found 322 studies. Hmm, if “big pharma” were trying to hide stuff, they wouldn’t put it in a searchable database for anyone to find it, would they?
____________________________
I’ll see your 322 studies and raise you 678.
I assume by now you’ve removed me from your government account Christmas card list?
I am reminded of what General Chiang Kai-shek said in the early ‘70s when asked what he thought about the (French) Enlightenment — “It’s too early to tell” was his reply.
All to these claims about gathered statistics, both for and against, are so politicized that they aren’t worth looking at either way. I learned in 1966 from a little book called “How to Lie with Statistics” that there is very little conclusive, truthful or “scientific” about these arguments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.