Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court hands Biden admin major win on challenge to ICE enforcement policy
Fox News ^ | 6/23/2023 | Adam Shaw

Posted on 06/23/2023 8:02:16 AM PDT by antidemoncrat

The Supreme Court on Friday handed the Biden administration a major victory on a key immigration case – ruling that GOP-led states do not have standing to challenge a policy narrowing federal immigration enforcement.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; border; decisions; enforcement; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last
Supreme Court of the US aka SCOTUS aka Supreme Clowns of the US
1 posted on 06/23/2023 8:02:16 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

If the States don’t have standing, who does? Is SCOTUS saying the feds are omnipotent?


2 posted on 06/23/2023 8:04:28 AM PDT by jeffc (Resident of the free State of Florida)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

This has always been the impediment to proper border enforcement - it’s completely under the power of the federal government, which is conveniently located far from the border. The border states have never had a say.


3 posted on 06/23/2023 8:05:09 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc
Is SCOTUS saying the feds are omnipotent?

When it comes to enforcing the borders of the United States, yes.
4 posted on 06/23/2023 8:05:58 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Do it anyway


5 posted on 06/23/2023 8:06:50 AM PDT by BigFreakinToad (Biden whispered "Don't Jump")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

There’s no precedent so let’s not make one.

Did the states go directly to SCOTUS or try in the lower courts first?

One thing they could all do is band together, take up the Tennessee lawsuit that was filed over Medicare payments, modify it and argue that bidens policies have created an unnecessary and harmful financial burden on their taxpayers.

But that ain’t gonna happen since most of the Governors and legislatures are RINOs and don’t care.


6 posted on 06/23/2023 8:07:38 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat
ruling that GOP-led states do not have standing to challenge a policy

**************

How can the states not have standing when they are affected by the matter at hand?

7 posted on 06/23/2023 8:08:30 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

I would have to say, YES.

Funny, when Pres Trump was in office, Dem states did whatever they wanted.

Never the other way around.


8 posted on 06/23/2023 8:08:38 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

And just like that, the US is over.

Tens of millions of Protected Class aliens will flood in uninhibited and simply lay claim to everything we have, cuz Da Soopremes said so.


9 posted on 06/23/2023 8:08:50 AM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

I can see this.

Now, if states want to enforce what is federal law, and the feds forbid it - that is absurd (just as honestly, “sanctuary” cities etc should have the leaders arrested, as it violates fed law). That is largely what has been happening for decades.

Apparently here, the feds are sort of narrowing the definition. So states etc have no more standing to say they must be enforced.


10 posted on 06/23/2023 8:09:14 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Federal-run medical care is as good as state-run DMVs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

“If the States don’t have standing, who does? Is SCOTUS saying the feds are omnipotent?”

Read Justice Thomas’ concurring opinion for an explanation.


11 posted on 06/23/2023 8:09:28 AM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Sounds to me like the SCOTUS assholes are saying we have no responsibility to accept foreign invaders into our state. When it comes to statelines, we have more friggin’ “STANDING” than you can shake a stick at. The Feds have no standing to tell the states how many foreign azzhos we are required to accept into our state to support and sponsor their illegal criminal azzes.


12 posted on 06/23/2023 8:09:30 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (FJB is out there signing hundreds of new gun laws and won't even enforce one against his own son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Pres Trump proved that it is completely under the Executive Branch.

Which is why he was able to do so many things. Imagine what could have happened if, in his first two years, Republicans actually helped him.


13 posted on 06/23/2023 8:09:46 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

You will be invaded, your families will be preyed upon & there is nothing you can do about it.


14 posted on 06/23/2023 8:10:26 AM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

8-1?

We still have Alito.


15 posted on 06/23/2023 8:10:44 AM PDT by Round Earther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc
If the States don’t have standing, who does? Is SCOTUS saying the feds are omnipotent?

I think this is saying that states can’t tell feds how to enforce a federal law. Just as feds should not (I know they do) tell states how to enforce state law.

Now, I would gather this to mean that states can create their own ICE and prosecute/deport as they see fit within the confines of their state where the FEDS can’t intervene.

Course what the heck do I know?
16 posted on 06/23/2023 8:10:49 AM PDT by mmichaels1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jeffc

They would have the “standing” they need if they got wise and seceded from this fascist conglomerate.


17 posted on 06/23/2023 8:11:03 AM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast (“We should not assume civilization is robust”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: antidemoncrat

Aiding and abetting the dismantling of the American rule of law.


18 posted on 06/23/2023 8:11:09 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Leaving the United States may be the only way to survive.


19 posted on 06/23/2023 8:11:11 AM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

The founders could have never imagined that the federal govt would allow the mess we have today.


20 posted on 06/23/2023 8:11:29 AM PDT by volunbeer (We are living 2nd Thessalonians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-126 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson