Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/18/2023 6:41:16 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: george76

Does anyone believe these newspapers? They are propaganda for the left.


2 posted on 05/18/2023 6:44:40 AM PDT by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Of course they don’t.

Mission accomplished.

Their goal was to undermine Trump’s (or any Republican’s) presidency and get him OUT OF OFFICE.

Which they did. The executive power is now in the hands of a Democrat and his appointed minions.

Mission accomplished. And they were rewarded for it.


3 posted on 05/18/2023 6:45:06 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

They won a Pullet Surprise!.....................


4 posted on 05/18/2023 6:45:56 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

They’re proud of them.


5 posted on 05/18/2023 6:46:09 AM PDT by ComputerGuy (Heavily-medicated for your protection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
Still waiting for the NYT and the Pulitzer Board to do the right thing and take back the Walter Durante 1932 Pulitzer prize...
Walter Duranty (25 May 1884 – 3 October 1957) was an Anglo-American journalist who served as Moscow bureau chief of The New York Times for fourteen years (1922–1936) following the Bolshevik victory in the Russian Civil War (1917–1923).

In 1932, Duranty received a Pulitzer Prize for a series of reports about the Soviet Union, eleven of which were published in June 1931. He was later criticized for his subsequent denial of the widespread famine (1930–1933) in the USSR, most particularly the Holodomor. Beginning in 1990, there were calls for the Pulitzer board to revoke Duranty's prize. The Pulitzer Board declined to revoke the award and in 2003 said the articles which it examined in making the award did not contain "clear and convincing evidence of deliberate deception"


6 posted on 05/18/2023 6:46:26 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (I don’t like to think before I say something...I want to be just as surprised as everyone else…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
WaPo and the NYT garnered Pulitzer Prizes — the most prestigious award in American journalism

It can't be that prestigious if they hand them out for lying to Americans. Unless they are now being honest and awarding journalists who commit the best lies and the most egregious fraud for their leftist activist cause.

7 posted on 05/18/2023 6:49:08 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

They offending newspaper should file a lawsuit against the Clinton Foundation for reparations.


8 posted on 05/18/2023 6:52:12 AM PDT by Clutch Martin ("The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

p


9 posted on 05/18/2023 7:00:29 AM PDT by bitt (<img src=' 'width=40%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

It’s not a prestigious prize. It could be if the prizes were rescinded by the Pulitzer organization.


12 posted on 05/18/2023 7:45:45 AM PDT by Ge0ffrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
I'm going to award the papers a

"bert Prize"

The

"bert"

is awarded to journalists who tell a whopper lie over and over until it becomes mainstream and accepted as truth
13 posted on 05/18/2023 7:51:29 AM PDT by bert ( (KWE. NP. N.C. +12) Juneteenth is inequality day )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

They effectively gave them to themselves. The Pulitzer board is not an independent objective body. It is part of the social bubble of elite media people, and Columbia J-school, which feeds them new personnel, plus revolving door professorships.


14 posted on 05/18/2023 7:57:13 AM PDT by buwaya (Strategic imperatives )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Pulitzer prizes for investigative journalism.

If there was no valid information to find, how did the NYT and WaPo find information to write the stories/articles? The answer is they didn’t find any information and they didn’t do any independent investigations. And as such, the stories and articles were nothing more than pablum.

But then again, recent history shows that pablum is what you get from both of them . . .


15 posted on 05/18/2023 8:45:20 AM PDT by MCSETots (at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

The Pulitzer is defined by activism, not accuracy. If anything it should be a shame to win one.


16 posted on 05/18/2023 8:58:22 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (/s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

why should they return their pulitzer propaganda awards?


17 posted on 05/18/2023 10:49:02 AM PDT by joshua c (to disrupt the system, we must disrupt our lives, cut the cable tv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson