Posted on 05/10/2023 4:18:28 PM PDT by CFW
President Joe Biden’s border chief Alejandro Mayorkas was asked Wednesday if his huge and growing inflow of economic migrants is good for Americans’ wages and rents, and he replied that this is a “Nation of Immigrants.”
The Cuban-born, pro-migration border chief took a few procedural questions from picked journalists when he presented part of his new plans to import more migrants into Americans’ workplaces and neighborhoods. “Our president has led the largest expansion of legal pathways ever,” Mayorkas said to a mostly empty press room.
But Breitbart News asked about the fairness of Mayorkas’s maximum-migration policies for ordinary Americans at a time of sliding wages, rising rents, and expanding civic chaos:
BBN: How do Americans gain from the immigration paths you are opening, sir? No [journalists] ever asks, “Do Americans gain from all the immigrants who you bring in — [even though] wages get pushed down, rents get pushed up.”
Mayorkas: Sir, we are a nation of immigrants. And we are a nation of laws. Individuals who qualify for relief under our laws have a basis to remain in the United States. The contributions of immigrants to this country is quite clear.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Biden and Mayorkas are violating federal law.
There is no law
In New York, the law is a weaponized negro. The DOJ is a weaponized political concept
Life is valued too high
If there is no law, then there is no law
Folks if we don’t do SOMETHING drastic but peaceful we are going to be Venezuela FULL STOP!!
https://www.muckraker.com/articles/darien-gap-mass-migration-pipeline-exposed/
“...economic migrants...”
More like blood-sucking TICKS!
Make sure there’s a bald guy with tree trunk arms named Bubba in there with them.
My grandparents came in through Ellis Island, Mayorkas. They went through humiliating medical examinations and were grilled about their politics and backgrounds (except my maternal grandfather who was an infant). So GFYS and your notion of a “Nation of Immigrants”. Immigrants are willing to go through a process, have sponsors responsible for them to keep them from becoming dependent on the welfare system, and work hard. These are invaders, not “immigrants”.
Americans better wake-up and demand better governance.
Very true...100% in agreement!
Yea, so why haven’t the republican in the house started impeachment proceedings? Hmmmm?
This should have happened yesterday.
Replacement theory in action.
I’m tired of people saying “nation of immigrants” like we don’t know that. But the legal immigrants came through the front door as required; via Ellis Island/NIS and were processed through there; they did not sneak across any border.
ONLY the DO”J” also burns the US Constitution
each morning so they won’t be reminded of their Oaths.
These “people” are traitors, known to millions
WHO DO NOTHING as the Republic is murdered by their
actions and inaction.
Mayorkas is a lying POS.
In more ways than one.
We are a nation of immigrants. He left out the important part. Those people were quick to relieve themselves of that status, in order to become Americans.
Today’s illegal aliens masquerading as immigrants with government enabling the myth. Those immigrants didn’t look suspiciously like an enemy invasion force.
“Patriots need to elect as much of a new Congress as they can in 2024 imo.”
Expect a younger, less informed, Congress.
Consider that one of the very few powers that the states have actually expressly constitutionally given to Congress to dictate peacetime domestic policy is to run the US Mail Service.
"Article I, Section 8, Clause 7: To establish Post Offices and post Roads;"
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
From the congressional record:
”Simply this, that the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Constitution, is in the States and not in the federal government [emphases added]. I have sought to effect no change in that respect in the Constitution of the country.” —John Bingham, Congressional. Globe. 1866, page 1292 (see top half of third column)
"From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]." —United States v. Butler, 1936.
In other words, most federal domestic policy is based on state powers, and uniquely associated state revenues, that the corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification feds are regularly stealing from the states, state revenues stolen by means of unconstitutional federal taxes according to the excerpt from Gibbons v. Ogden above.
In fact, since the drafters of the Constitution had intended for the peacetime federal government to basically be in lame duck mode 24/7, after Trump 47 finishes draining the swamp, he and Congress can follow Obama's example and spend more time on the golf courses while keeping the mail moving.
So I think that a younger, less informed Congress can handle the mail service.
On the other hand, since the plurality of Congress's constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited duties are military related, electing military retirees to Congress is a consideration.
Get over yourself
Bookmark
Want better governance.?? Repeal the 17th. amendment and bring some of the power back to the states where it belongs..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.