Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jury finds Trump DID sexually abuse E. Jean Carroll in Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the 1990s: Ex-President is cleared of rape but ordered to pay her $5m damages
Daily Mail UK ^ | May 9, 2023 | Kayla Brantley

Posted on 05/09/2023 12:18:04 PM PDT by Morgana

A jury has found that Donald Trump sexually abused E. Jean Carroll.

The panel of six men and three women also found that Trump injured advice columnist Carroll in a Manhattan Bergdorf Goodman dressing room and defamed her, ordering the former President to pay her $5million in damages.

Trump has been accused of sexual misconduct or assault by more than two dozen women, but this has so far been the only case to end up before a jury.

Carroll, 79, sued for battery under the Adult Survivors Act, a law passed in New York that allowed a one year window for sexual assault claims normally outside of the statute of limitations.

Her claim for defamation was based on statements made by Trump, 76, when he was President and posts to Truth Social, his own social network in which he called her a liar.

Over two weeks the jury heard emotional testimony from three accusers and two of Carroll's friends, among other witnesses, while Trump himself was a no show.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 1desantis2024; 1furd; bananarepublic; bs; civilsuit; democratfunded; dishonestheadline; fakenews; grabdapuzzy; harassment; lawfare; liable; neoconsvotedbiden; nevertrump; newyork; nodate; noevidence; noiqrinos; noyear; orangemanbad; persecution; showtrial; sickofityet; sickofrinosonfr; tds; thereisadress; trump; withoutevidence; zeroevidence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 361-374 next last
To: MIA_eccl1212

Hmmm. Well, the statute of limitation issue is in the NewYork criminal case, not this civil case. Beyond the fact that you’re talking about the wrong case, please remember what I said: appeals are not a mulligan, a do over in front of a different court. The judgment is presumed to be correct, and if you didn’t show up to contradict the testimony, you essentially have to show there was NO evidence to support the judgment. Not that the evidence was weak, or that it shouldn’t have been believed , but that NO evidence existed. I agree the plaintiff is a nut, and probably a liar, but her testimony, believed by the jury, is all that’s required to support the judgment. I know it’s not what you and some of the others want to hear, but I’ve been a lawyer for more than 30 years. What I’ve outlined is what the law provides for, period.


221 posted on 05/09/2023 3:06:17 PM PDT by j.havenfarm (22 years on Free Republic, 12/10/22! more then 6500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: lodi90; All

Trump is running for President. It doesn’t matter what the courts say. The country is done. If Trump can someone become President again he has an outside chance on rolling things back some. His calculus is all about becoming President (even if hes convicted 100 times for 100 different reasons). If he loses both he and his countrymen are screwed no matter what. Trump has basically given up his whole life for his country. He had it made before 2015


222 posted on 05/09/2023 3:06:23 PM PDT by wiseprince (Me,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

Fine. Whatever. Nice fantasy. But the pendency of the appeal does not stop the collection of the judgment. He can ask for a stay, but the court doesn’t have to grant it and, if it does, it will probably require a bond as in the Oberlin College case


223 posted on 05/09/2023 3:10:02 PM PDT by j.havenfarm (22 years on Free Republic, 12/10/22! more then 6500 replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

This decision is legally unsustainable and will eventually be overturned on appeal. While it is legal to. extend a time frame for statutory deadline for particular statute of limitation, that extension must occur BEFORE the statuette of limitation period for that particular limitation has run out. For example, if there is a two year statute of limitation on bringing charges for jay walking, a state can lawfully extend the statue of limitation person to 5 years. Any person who has jay walked and is still within the time frame of the original 2 year statuette of limitations at the time the new 5 year limitation period goes into effect is now subject to the 5 year period going forward . However, any individual who jaywalked 2 years plus one day and is no longer subject to charges due to the 2 year statuette of limitations is also not subject to the extension of the statuette of limitations to 5 years. There are many legal reasons for this not the least of which is the explicit constitutional prohibition on ex post facto laws.


224 posted on 05/09/2023 3:10:26 PM PDT by rdcbn1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FES0844
Words fail. This is so wrong.

You're CORRECT.. however, something tells me this is going to BACKFIRE on the LEFT.

I predict Trump will, in the end, once again PREVAIL.

225 posted on 05/09/2023 3:12:20 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: McCarthysGhost

I’m still amazed at how many Freepers still don’t get it. The Cabal is going to try and get Trump off the political stage at all costs. He could have vehemently denied the charges and took the stand in his own defense, and that NY jury would of still found him guilty.


226 posted on 05/09/2023 3:15:41 PM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

And the hatred is the most inexplicable. He was da man. He owns some of the New York Skyline to this day, and even his minor projects, like 40 Wall Street, are things of beauty, and he renovated the skating rink, and his career is legendary. He was everybody’s pal until he dared to run against Hitlery as a Republican, and win, preventing her coronation.


227 posted on 05/09/2023 3:16:33 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

This is the same chick thrown off by Anderson Cooper for saying that rape is sexy. Nuts that anyone on a jury would believe here.


228 posted on 05/09/2023 3:17:26 PM PDT by Trump_Triumphant ("Our hearts are restless, Oh Lord, until they rest in thee"- St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

So don’t ever hire a lawyer from Stanford or New York.


229 posted on 05/09/2023 3:23:25 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

Having sued the Rockefeller real estate empire once, during my days as a paralegal, they will have the Devil’s own time collecting the judgment. There was such a maze of corporations and subsidiaries and shell companies, that we thought we sued everyone entity involved, but—SHAZAM!—we forgot one, the only one that had responsibility for the building in question apparently, and the court dismissed the PI complaint on that basis.

I doubt Trump’s personal liability is just wandering around mid-town like a babe in the woods, waiting to be scooped up and eaten by any psycho who gets a judgment against him. His old attorney Roy Cohn was a vicious SOB and a flaming homo, but also a brilliant lawyer. There are similar layers of corporate prestidigitation around all his assets as there were around the Rockefellers’ when my office sued them. No doubt.


230 posted on 05/09/2023 3:26:01 PM PDT by Eleutheria5 (Every Goliath has his David. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

“Trump was horrible on that tape! Good Lord! This care was so easy and DJT blew it! Ugh!”

He even made inappropriate comments about the female attorney questioning him.


231 posted on 05/09/2023 3:27:21 PM PDT by trustverify0128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment

Nope a civil case does not involve conviction of anything


232 posted on 05/09/2023 3:27:42 PM PDT by brookwood (To acheive equity, the percentage of whites in prison must equal the percentage of blacks in prison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Trump saying she wasn’t his type but thinking she was Marla Maples in the photo they showed him sure didn’t help.


233 posted on 05/09/2023 3:29:44 PM PDT by FreedomForce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg

“He is wrong. For one thing, he is not destroyed,”

We were discussing the trial.


234 posted on 05/09/2023 3:30:17 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

Trump put on no defense. The art of the deal maker should have used his charm and skills to close the jury.


235 posted on 05/09/2023 3:30:38 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: trustverify0128

Reversible error...?


236 posted on 05/09/2023 3:31:13 PM PDT by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: j.havenfarm

stay tuned


237 posted on 05/09/2023 3:32:38 PM PDT by MIA_eccl1212 (When the bad guys have leverage they use it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Isn’t it true that hookers take money for sex?

five million... wow


238 posted on 05/09/2023 3:32:57 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devane617

Rape??...

... in a Manhattan Bergdorf Goodman dressing room.?

239 posted on 05/09/2023 3:36:26 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rdcbn1

I’m not following you. Was this suit not originated long after the SOL, on the basis of the special “Adult Survivors Act?” And that had a one year deadline, by which time she filed.


240 posted on 05/09/2023 3:38:05 PM PDT by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 361-374 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson