Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Whew! I got a bunch of liquid stuff in the backyard currently and was getting nervous about stepping in any of it. But, with this (b)administration, CONgressional action means squat.
1 posted on 03/11/2023 7:52:46 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

Biden will veto it. House can’t pass any laws by themselves. Need senate & executive branch to go along.


2 posted on 03/11/2023 7:54:39 AM PST by entropy12 (Food is most popular anxiety drug, exercise is the least popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Yeah the stolen senate gets it next.


3 posted on 03/11/2023 7:56:00 AM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I’m sick of the word “overreaching”. It sound like going for the rolls at the Thanksgiving table.

How about: “illegal abuse of power”.


6 posted on 03/11/2023 7:58:29 AM PST by Fido969 (45 is Superman! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Plowed fields should never have Bern considered navigable waters. Michigan, with the blasted Democrats in charge, will try it.


12 posted on 03/11/2023 8:02:16 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Am working on a project out in CA. 10K plus elev., seepy site. Feds are asserting jurisdiction under cwa, as the ‘wetland’ is (supposedly) tributary to a creek that connects to a river that runs into lake that is, according to them, “Navigable Water of US”. The waters are in this case Owens Lake, which is dry, mostly, its water sources having been diverted to LA long ago.


17 posted on 03/11/2023 8:35:46 AM PST by drwoof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I swear I think we have the Manchurian Candidate in the WH.


18 posted on 03/11/2023 8:38:18 AM PST by Rappini (In hoc signo vinces)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Lord, is that Sackett case STILL GOING ON?! It should’ve been settled long ago...in favor of the Sacketts.


20 posted on 03/11/2023 9:03:43 AM PST by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

It’s getting to be time to start killing.


21 posted on 03/11/2023 9:04:13 AM PST by Lazamataz (The firearms I own today, are the firearms I will die with. How I die will be up to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman; All
Thank you for referencing that article rktman.

"House Votes To Overturn ‘Overreaching’ Biden Water Rule"


FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

While it's good that the House overturned Biden water rule, please consider the following.

When President James Madison vetoed the Bonus Bill of 1817, he wrote the statement below (3rd bullet) concerning the scope of Congress's Commerce Clause powers in the constitutionally required veto explanation.

Based on Madison's clarification of navigable water courses versus the post-17th Amendment ratification Congress's very limited Commerce Clause powers, the feds don't have the constitutional control over such water courses that they evidently think that they do imo.

Patriots, the bottom line is this imo. What is your threshold of “pain” for peacefully stopping unconstitutionally big state and federal governments controlled by bully, constitutionally undefined political parties, from oppressing the people under their boots?

The inevitable remedy for ongoing, post-17A ratification, corrupt political party treason (imo)...

All MAGA patriots need to wake up their RINO federal and state lawmakers by making the following clear to them.

If they don’t publicly support either a resolution, or a Constitutional Convention, to effectively "secede" ALL the states from the unconstitutionally big federal government by amending the Constitution to repeal the 16th (direct taxes) and 17th (popular voting for federal senators) Amendments (16&17A), doing so before the primary elections in 2024, that YOU will primary them.

If the proposed amendment was limited strictly to repealing 16&17A, relatively little or ideally no discussion would be needed before ratification of the amendment imo.

With 16&17A out of the way, my hope is that Trump 47 becomes the FIRST president of a truly constitutionally limited power federal government.

In the meanwhile, I'm not holding my breath for significant MAGA legislation to appear in the first 100 days of new term for what may still prove to be another RINO-controlled House.

Trump will hopefully do another round of primarying RINOs for 2024 elections.

22 posted on 03/11/2023 9:40:07 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

WOTUS, the biggest federal land grab in history.


34 posted on 03/11/2023 10:52:19 AM PST by griswold3 (Truth, Beauty and Goodness ; Quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

This has already been settled by the USSC in Rapanos v US and SWANNC.

States can tell the EPA to stick a sewer pipe up its butt.


36 posted on 03/11/2023 11:15:40 AM PST by sergeantdave (AI is the next iteration of a copy and paste machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Here is the Vote
37 posted on 03/11/2023 1:07:10 PM PST by BigEdLB (Let’s go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson