~ Q
Posted on 11/29/2022 10:10:38 PM PST by bitt
As The Gateway Pundit previously reported, Balenciaga is facing major backlash after a new ad depicted several young girls holding stuffed teddy bears in bondage gear.
In a secondary report, it was discovered Balenciaga used a copy of United States v. Williams which was a child pornography case decided by the Supreme Court, as a prop.
Only after major pushback ensued, Balenciaga apologized and sued the production company for the subliminal messages contained in the photo shoot.
Despite even apologizing for the shoot, The New York Times has just written a lengthy puff piece titled “When High Fashion and QAnon Collide”.
The article which took three journalists to write essentially protected Balenciaga in almost every line and blamed QAnon, Tucker Carlson, The New York Post, and Fox News for the new public belief the luxury brand condones child exploitation.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
p
[Balenciaga is facing major backlash after a new ad depicted several young girls holding stuffed teddy bears in bondage gear.]
I couldn’t believe it when I saw the TC episode. Incredible.
So them trying to deflect to blaming Tucker Carlson, Qanon, etc, is supposed to make everyone think they have lying eyes?
Are we just supposed to unsee what we saw and believe their explanation?
Yeah, Q-Anon is definitely at fault here! /s
Who in the Sam Hell is stupid enough to float that one?
The Times has turned into a sad pathetic offensive travesty
of reasoned reporting.
Sick!
NYT objects to the inconvenient evidence of child grooming and pedophilia. It undermines the left’s narrative that the drag queen sex shows are wholesome activities for children.
BBC World Service, broadcasting to the world, did a piece last nite, which would have been repeated multiple times.
said there was “widespread upset” over the ads - NOT the usual “WORLDWIDE OUTRAGE” when it’s some misrepresented comment by Trump or someone on the right.
went on to say well, Balenciaga are known for being “provocative”, encouraging conversation, blah blah.
I always provide links but, in this case, I can’t even be bothered going to BBC’s website to locate one.
what a disgrace the FakeNewsMSM is.
pedo slimes
Latest Disturbing Info On Balenciaga, Proves (Anons) Were Probably 100 Percent Right
Disturbed anontards were probably 100% spastic goobers.
When the NYT attacks a agency for reporting the story and demonizes a third party like this, it shows how bad the backlash is for the left.
~ Q
You're becoming way too obvious, Bumpkin. Upgrade your technique.
I must be the only one who got to the end of the article assuming this Balencia guy was probably some Democrat politician.
All the while presenting outrage over being called (or implied) a “pedophile booster” around here.
I defer to “pedotolerant” but that’s just me.
Hmmmm, same-same strategy as the NYTimes.
Dasting...
I have repeatedly posted on this forum that for the liberal leftists, NOTHING else matters but the defense of perversion. Nothing. That IS their only agenda.
“Probably?”
So much angst from the usual suspects, over our lack of “pedotolerance”.
As expected.
That's what you get, Pinhead.
You prove my point exactly... you run around accusing people you don't
like of being peddyfiles with zero evidence when they obviously aren't.
That's what you get, as expected. The beatings will continue until morale (and behavior) improves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.