Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Affidavit Gives DOJ Enough to Indict Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz Says
Newsweek ^ | August 26, 2022 | Katherine Fung

Posted on 08/26/2022 2:56:00 PM PDT by Trump20162020

Donald Trump's former attorney Alan Dershowitz said that the unsealed affidavit supporting the FBI's search of Mar-a-Lago gives the Justice Department enough evidence to indict the former president.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 4a; 4thamendment; alandershowitz; bs; codswallop; democrat; dershowitz; doanldtrump; doj; fakenews; fbi; fib; fourthamendment; iylm; katherinefung; maralagoraid; moron; newsweak; stupidcomment; tds; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: Trump20162020

The Feddies have to continue trying to put President Trump in jail to keep Jo Jo’s little Hunter out of jail.


61 posted on 08/26/2022 3:44:43 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Impeach Jo Jo now while we still have a country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 41 specifically says At the request of a federal law enforcement officer or an attorney for the government:

(1) a magistrate judge with authority in the district—or if none is reasonably available, a judge of a state court of record in the district—has authority to issue a warrant to search for and seize a person or property located within the district;

62 posted on 08/26/2022 3:49:39 PM PDT by jpp113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Dershowitz to Newsmax: Affidavit Doesn’t Show Enough to Indict Trump
8/26/2022, 3:36:31 PM · by SoConPubbie · 13 replies
NewsMax ^ | Friday, 26 August 2022 04:38 PM EDT | Luca Cacciatore

Affidavit Gives DOJ Enough to Indict Donald Trump, Alan Dershowitz Says
8/26/2022, 2:56:00 PM · by Trump20162020 · 60 replies
Newsweek ^ | August 26, 2022 | Katherine Fung

LMAO


63 posted on 08/26/2022 3:51:43 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (I pledge allegiance the flag of the U S of A, and to the REPUBLIC for which stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020
Newsweak - Donald Trump's former attorney Alan Dershowitz said that the unsealed affidavit supporting the FBI's search of Mar-a-Lago gives the Justice Department enough evidence to indict the former president.

Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax that Attorney General Merrick Garland might not have enough to indict former President Donald Trump based on the Mar-a-Lago raid's affidavit.

Well which version do we believe?

64 posted on 08/26/2022 3:53:09 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Funny, there’s another thread going that says the opposite.


65 posted on 08/26/2022 3:53:14 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (I do not recognize Biden’s authority. (@FeistyFed on TS) 🐝)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Let me know when Dershowitz, the DOJ, and FBI prove INTENT, kthx! =.=


66 posted on 08/26/2022 3:59:14 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020; All

Dershowitz to Newsmax: Affidavit Doesn’t Show Enough to Indict Trump

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4088598/posts

Which is it?


67 posted on 08/26/2022 4:00:14 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

It could be both? “Some prosecutors will see this as enough to indict - I don’t see it that way” .. sort of thing?


68 posted on 08/26/2022 4:03:51 PM PDT by shadowlands1960 ("...some day you will be old enough to start reading fairy tales again... " CSL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

That was the whole purpose…not that Alan agrees with it


69 posted on 08/26/2022 4:04:37 PM PDT by Hypo2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie; Trump20162020

You are correct about Prof Dersh’s actual statement-I was here at my desk, doing a Friday ritual-typing/printing invoices while watching Newsmax-so I saw the interview-he doesn’t seem to think the FBI is on very stable ground and should have just made a phone call to pres Trump’s lawyers to ask for the stuff or gotten a subpoena like normal people do...


70 posted on 08/26/2022 4:05:49 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

BS


71 posted on 08/26/2022 4:08:41 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WMarshal

Doesn’t matter either way, he’ll be indicted.


72 posted on 08/26/2022 4:17:56 PM PDT by Husker24 (Pp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tlozo

The saying originated during the reign of Manhattan DA Frank Hogan. Who did indeed indict thousands, sometimes with little cause. And if Trump is indicted his trial will be in the District where his conviction is as certain as a Frank Hogan indictment.


73 posted on 08/26/2022 4:25:58 PM PDT by xkaydet65 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Dershowitz said the EXACT OPPOSITE of this idiotic Newsweek posting.

Here: https://www.newsmax.com/politics/newsmax-dershowitz-mar-a-lago/2022/08/26/id/1084831/


74 posted on 08/26/2022 4:26:58 PM PDT by John S Mosby ( Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020
This thread says the exact opposite. So which is it?

Dershowitz to Newsmax: Affidavit Doesn't Show Enough to Indict Trump

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4088598/posts

75 posted on 08/26/2022 4:27:35 PM PDT by SmokingJoe ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24

Dream on!
See #73 and #74


76 posted on 08/26/2022 4:29:56 PM PDT by SmokingJoe ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Husker24

Correction: 74 & 75


77 posted on 08/26/2022 4:31:38 PM PDT by SmokingJoe ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper

You took my thoughts and wrote them down. He is compromised.


78 posted on 08/26/2022 4:37:29 PM PDT by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

I just read an article by Alan Dershowitz on Newmax and it says that there is NOT enough to indict. Who is full of s^^t?


79 posted on 08/26/2022 4:49:48 PM PDT by Agatsu77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Dershowitz to Newsmax: Affidavit Doesn’t Show Enough to Indict Trump


80 posted on 08/26/2022 4:50:21 PM PDT by Mark (Celebrities... is there anything they do not know? Homer Simpson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson