[FlingWingFlyer]

(((YAWN))) Shut up Lizard Queen

[SoConPubbie]

Those, however, weren't from Trump himself -- and Trump's personal involvement raises the stakes if the message was intended to impact a witness' testimony

Except this isn't a trial, so that statement was a lie.

[dsrtsage]

[Paladin2]

Molehill <<< Mountain

Anybody check the straw supply in the Capitol?

[Williams]

Oh Puleeeeze.

Cheney is pure scum and her own constituents hate her.

A phone call? That wasn’t answered so there was no discussion.

What a crock of nothing.

[catnipman]

where’s Vindman listening in when they really needed him ...

[MtnClimber]

If the witness has not yet been publicly identified, then what are they trying to imply?

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The House of Representatives January 6th inquisition has no criminal justice authority.

The only power they have is to investigate legislative issues.

I can’t wait until Lizzie runs for President show she can learn just how much people hate her.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Liz Cheney orchestrated the Russian collusion hoax that’s why she’s trying to destroy Trump

[ptsal]

Manufacture an alleged crime.

[Tench_Coxe]

I sincerely hope that if Republicans retake the House, with a large contingent of MAGA, that this “woman” and her family have their dealings put under a microscope.

[Cyclops08]

another nothingburger

[McGavin999]

Anyone see the CNN man on the Street interviews? NewMax showed them and it was hysterical. Everyone they interviewed said they didn’t care, it’s not important.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Took 4 people to write this?

[spacejunkie2001]

sounds like made up crap because they’re desperate

[hinckley buzzard]

This is what happens when you piss of a deranged menopausal female with delusions of grandeur. So Trump “attempted” to call a “witness” who hasn’t been a witness, for a hearing which is not a trial and for which there is no meaning to “tampering.”

[Sgt_Schultze]

If the “witness” wasn’t identified, how could anyone know they were talking to a witness?

[SecondAmendment]

As predicted, this whole farce was to entrap, indict, and convict Trump on a Federal process crime in the jurisdiction of Washington D.C.

Trump is going to be frogmarched by the midterms, and will be ineligible to run in 2024.

The Dems did something similar to Tom DeLay and Ted Stevens, CWII starts soon ...

[nomorelurker]

“Attempting to call a witness does not necessarily rise to witness tampering on its own, and it’s unclear what if anything the Justice Department would do in response to Cheney’s comments.”

An hour a so ago listened to NPR describe this as a “Bombshell”, this is a Congress investigation not a Grand Jury, much less a criminal trial.

I am beginning to believe we are into Soviet Union “show trials” much as I did not want believe that, despite what other posters here have said.

[TwelveOfTwenty]

When I first joined FR, I had to debate a group who wanted to be the next Buckhead, throwing their articles about Obama's scandals around as if no one who wasn't a Conservative couldn't access them. BTW, most if not all have been banned.

That was bad enough.

Now we have to deal with all of this Jan 6 nonsense thanks to the Conservatives who wanted to recreate the storming of the Bastille, and were literally duped into giving the Democrats their Reichstag attack instead. To them, the Democrats say "Thank you."

It's nice to see we learned our lesson when the Democrats tried it again, but how could we have fallen for that?