To: lowbridge
If the witness has not yet been publicly identified, then what are they trying to imply?
9 posted on
07/12/2022 4:29:45 PM PDT by
MtnClimber
(For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
To: MtnClimber
Just because Trump did not know the person was a possible witness and just because he did not talk him does not mean that this can’t be used to create a headline that would make Trump out to be a criminal. You have to remember that being fair has nothing to do with all of this.
;)
34 posted on
07/12/2022 4:52:00 PM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(The problem today: people are more concerned about feelings than responsibility.)
To: MtnClimber
What they are trying to infer is that Trump talking to anyone that they have, will, might, could depose or request documents, emails, txt or meta data from tech companies, IS witness tampering. LOL
82 posted on
07/12/2022 7:26:01 PM PDT by
usnavy_cop_retired
(Retiree in the P.I. living as a legal immigrant)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson