Posted on 05/16/2022 10:39:52 AM PDT by JayGalt
GOP U.S. Senate candidate Kathy Barnette in an interview on Monday morning refused to support the GOP nominee for U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania if she does not win the nomination on Tuesday.
Asked during an appearance on Breitbart News Daily on SiriusXM 125 the Patriot Channel on Monday by Breitbart News editor-in-chief Alex Marlow if she will support whoever wins the nomination, she said she will not.
“If you do not win tomorrow, do you intend to support the Republican nominee whoever it is?” Marlow asked.
In reply, she said she will not support the Republican nominee against the likely Democrat nominee Lt. Gov. John Fetterman. It is worth noting Fetterman is an avowed socialist, so Barnette refusing to support either Dr. Mehmet Oz or businessman David McCormick if one of them wins instead of her essentially means she would be helping a socialist Democrat win in the general election.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Horribly written article. So what if she doesn’t actively support a RINO? Does that mean she’s helping the enemy? No. The 2 are different. This is the same stupid garbage the Establishment pulled on Trump in 16. He got this question in EVERY debate, and ultimately he agreed to support the nominee just as every other candidate did. Then Trump wins the nomination and very few of those that promised to support the nominee did. Alex Marlowe, quit playing this stoopid game!
What Pennsylvania county do you live in?
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
Spend a few of your many bucks to poison the well ?
They'd probably see it as a cost effective disruption tactic.
“They’d probably see it as a cost effective disruption tactic.”
Hope that’s all it is because Club For Growth sure as hell isn’t MAGA.
Which is precisely why I’d suspect double-dealing.
Lesser of two evils always results in more evil not less.
She said she will not vote for a Globalist. Big Difference.
OMG, adding depth changes the perception of what was said.
Anyone that votes for someone who believes that taking care of their own country last is best. That nationalism is racist and all the other lies they throw around, is not worthy of holding a government job PERIOD.
OK. My pause with her is based on a video I saw where she was talking to her volunteers. She wanted them to pass out her position card to neighbors and she said, if they don’t want to take the card ask them if they are racist, ask if they don’t want to support the first black woman running for the Senate in PA.
I understand the passionate desire to win & perhaps even the belief that you will fight for Pennsylvanians.
For me the race card is a bridge too far because it means that you identify by race. We have seen that play out over & over in black people sent to Washington. It’s all people, all Americans that need a fair shake & a road to opportunity, education, success through effort & merit.
The serpent of identity by color and by sex will always rise up & bite if it is part of your makeup and that makes me leary of Barnette.
I am a person, an American even an Italian with some Russian Jewish ancestry but only the first two matter to me the others are incidentals.
Barnette may have a drive to work for America & Americans especially from PA. She has a compelling story and professes Conservative beliefs that align with my own.
I can’t see inside her soul nor should I try and if she wins PA I will cheer her success. If I were voting in PA I would be wary of each of the 3 top candidates.
Why would you have a problem with that? The RATs play the race card in much worse ways, and way more often. Turn-about is fair play. Give them a taste of their own medicine.
Doesn’t make it right and speaks to a frame of mind. Only my opinion. I feel the same way about women who expect that being a woman is relevant in politics. It’s a real turnoff.
How is a vote against gun rights by a democrat, and a vote against gun rights by Oz any different?
Asking for a bunch of friends.
He isn’t going to do anything on guns.
Not with a majority of his senators unwilling to expose him which is unlikely since they are all on the take too. Did anyone notice the Jim Jordan said today he would support McCarthy for Speaker if they regain the majority? Can't trust any of them I guess.
What a BS article!
dems couldn’t do any better
READ what she said
Pretty small issue without any context. Abortion is a huge issue and she is the walking reason for not having one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.