WATCH: Jen Psaki Says White House Encourages ‘Peaceful’ Protests Outside Justices’ Homes

Breitbart ^ | 05/10/2022 | Joel B Pollack

[ChicagoConservative27]

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Tuesday that the Biden administration encourages “peaceful” protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices, despite the fact that such protests aim to intimidate the judiciary and appear to be illegal.

[GreenHornet]

Maybe somebody should make her home address public, and provide maps so that people can stage a peaceful protest outside of her house.

[PIF]

Its a US Title felony to harass, incite, intimidate, protest etc Federal judges including SCOTS. There is no legal cover in this case.

Off with her head!!

[ETCM]

She is inciting a felony, and if we did it the left would call it treason.

[wgmalabama]

You were told where to watch it. Response or a collaborator?

[Grampa Dave]

Who can you get to enforce it?

Probably no one, now!

However, if our so called conservative justices tell America that they/the supremos should not rule on cases like this and to send the new cases to red states.

We might see some legal justice finally delivered in those red states.

[Uncle Miltie]

Biden promotes insurrection!!!

[bennowens]

Another reason for impeachment of sitting President.

[BiteYourSelf]

Or in the halls of Congress.🙄

[mware]

Schumer is even worse, wants everyone in House and senate on record tomorrow permitting abortion up until the moment of birth.

[Chode]

there ya go...

[Labyrinthos]

“And that Bastard Roberts could end it today by releasing the ruling. So he is fine with putting the Justices through hell to “soften them up”.”

You know nothing about how the SCOTUS works. In a case of this magnitude, there will be a majority opinion, and most likely, multiple concurring and dissenting opinions - each of wich circulated multiple times before release. Roberts has not released the opinions because they are not ready for release, and probably won’t be ready until late June.

[Old Coach1]

Lawless

[Michael.SF.]

LOL. I don’t live on my computer. Just returned.

[fuzzylogic]

- Stalking
- term commonly used to refer to a pattern of behavior directed towards an individual by another that results in the person to whom the behavior is directed fearing for themselves and/or others. The behaviors can involve overtly criminal behavior or seemingly non-criminal, innocent behavior or both.
- Disorderly conduct
- intent to cause public alarm, nuisance, jeopardy or violence
- Uses language, an utterance, or gesture, or engages in a display or act that is obscene, physically threatening or menacing, or done in a manner that is *likely* to inflict injury or incite an immediate breach of the peace.
- Makes noise that is unreasonable, considering the nature and purpose of the actor’s conduct, location, time of day or night, and other factors that would govern the conduct of a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances
- Disturbing the peace
- also referred to as breach of the peace, is when a person disturbs peace and tranquility in a public space.
- Creating a disturbance
- Act of intimidation
- (also called cowing) is intentional behavior that would cause a person of reasonable apprehension to fear injury or harm. It is not necessary to prove that the behavior caused the victim to experience terror or panic.
- Loitering

...I’m no lawyer but it would appear this is quite the choice by police.

[fuzzylogic]

...and Psaki just encouraged it all.

Arrest her now.

[Michael.SF.]

You are correct. I stand corrected thank you.

[wgmalabama]

I don’t either but dang, did you doubt they wouldn’t do exactly what they accuse PDJT of doing. I didn’t see it until then but it rang true because the Dupitcraps are vile disgusting creatures.

[Philo1962]

... the Biden administration encourages “peaceful” protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices, despite the fact that such protests aim to intimidate the judiciary and appear to be illegal.

They don't just "appear to be illegal." THESE PROTESTS ARE ILLEGAL.

18 USC § 1507:

"Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

Now let's see if Joe Biden and Merrick Garland are inclined to enforce this law. (They won't.)

[Michael.SF.]

For some reason I misheard what she said. But you are right, they really do feel the laws do not apply to them.

I asked the mods to remove my comment.

[gibsonguy]

Given Roberts treachery of the past would it surprise you that the final ruling is ready but he is sitting on it?