Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WATCH: Jen Psaki Says White House Encourages ‘Peaceful’ Protests Outside Justices’ Homes
Breitbart ^ | 05/10/2022 | Joel B Pollack

Posted on 05/10/2022 3:05:28 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Tuesday that the Biden administration encourages “peaceful” protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices, despite the fact that such protests aim to intimidate the judiciary and appear to be illegal.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bideninsurrection; dncinsurrection; encourages; insurrection; nlz; protests; psaki; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27

Hey Jen, isn’t that exactly what Trump said on J6 that you’ve been screeching was insurrection?


21 posted on 05/10/2022 3:23:34 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

BKMK


22 posted on 05/10/2022 3:23:58 PM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Then the WH is encouraging people to break the law, as a demonstration at a judge’s residence is a crime. Do I hear insurrection?


23 posted on 05/10/2022 3:25:18 PM PDT by Mlheureux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Since that is illegal per 18USC1507, are they going to hold an impeachment vote?


24 posted on 05/10/2022 3:25:23 PM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Thank you for posting.

Who can you get to enforce it?


25 posted on 05/10/2022 3:27:28 PM PDT by .30Carbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Trump encouraged peaceful protest outside the Whitehouse (not anyone's home). Double standard much, Psaki?


26 posted on 05/10/2022 3:32:29 PM PDT by so_real ( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Lock ‘em up. Let’s go Brandon. (a twofer)


27 posted on 05/10/2022 3:33:31 PM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mercat

But we only did it because they did it


28 posted on 05/10/2022 3:33:34 PM PDT by MrRelevant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

If that is how she feels, fine..perhaps some people show pay her a visit see how she likes it


29 posted on 05/10/2022 3:35:04 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PIF

WTAF?!!?!!


30 posted on 05/10/2022 3:36:57 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

So she and the WH embrace treason by their own reasoning. InFrigginCredible


31 posted on 05/10/2022 3:37:58 PM PDT by realcleanguy (quickly things are falling apart, now that the )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy
And that Bastard Roberts could end it today by releasing the ruling. So he is fine with putting the Justices through hell to “soften them up”.

We don't know behind the scenes.
Could somebody be holding that up?

32 posted on 05/10/2022 3:40:46 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: boycott

It pre-dates Barry Obama. Tom Wolfe’s essay “Mau Mauing the Flak Catchers” (1970) details how militant blacks would organize protests and demonstrations to bully hapless San Francisco bureaucrats into handing over cash etc. to them.


33 posted on 05/10/2022 3:40:59 PM PDT by irishjuggler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Howsbout “mostly” peaceful protests?


34 posted on 05/10/2022 3:41:15 PM PDT by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Still a felony.


35 posted on 05/10/2022 3:41:22 PM PDT by Seruzawa ("The Political left is the Garden of Eden of incompetence" - Marx the Smarter (Groucho))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Please, oh please, have an equally noisy and loathsome rally outside the little smarmy redhead’s home to see how she (more properly, it) likes it.


36 posted on 05/10/2022 3:43:37 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Rat thugs know damn well they’re being hypocritical, and are taking great pleasure shoving it in our faces.

If only the GOP wasn’t Rat-lite.


37 posted on 05/10/2022 3:47:05 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Has Merrick Garland ordered Biden to be Arrested for INSURRECTION Yet?


38 posted on 05/10/2022 3:49:06 PM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Mob rule or ochlocracy:

Mob rule or ochlocracy (Greek: ὀχλοκρατία, romanized: okhlokratía; Latin: ochlocratia) is the rule of government by a mob or mass of people and the intimidation of legitimate authorities.

*The constitutional safeguards relating to the integrity of the criminal process attend every stage of a criminal proceeding, starting with arrest and culminating with a trial “in a courtroom presided over by a judge.” There can be no doubt that they embrace the fundamental conception of a fair trial, and that they exclude influence or domination by either a hostile or friendly mob.

*There is no room at any stage of judicial proceedings for such intervention; mob law is the very antithesis of due process. A State may adopt safeguards necessary and appropriate to assure that the administration of justice at all stages is free from outside control and influence. A narrowly drawn statute such as the one under review is obviously a safeguard both necessary and appropriate to vindicate the State’s interest in assuring justice under law.

*https://reason.com/volokh/2022/05/06/federal-statute-bans-picketing-judges-residences-with-the-intent-of-influencing-the-judge/


39 posted on 05/10/2022 3:51:38 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (JUST LEAVE US ALONE!...Be whatever, you think you are!!!! On YOUR Time and Dime, NOT OURS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

She needs Doxxed


40 posted on 05/10/2022 3:53:36 PM PDT by Fledermaus (I'll wear a mask when Dr. Fraudchi shuts the hell up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson