Posted on 01/29/2022 7:28:39 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
The first thing I did when the three Covid vaccines were given their Emergency Use Authorizations between mid-December 2020 and late February of 2021 was to seek out the summaries of the clinical findings that had led to these regulatory actions. I quickly found them and delved into what they had to say on protection against infection and transmission.
I did so because my intuitions, backed by my reading of non-mainstream sources, had long suggested to me that the endgame envisioned by those managing the pandemic was to impose vaccine mandates on as many people and as many populations as they could.
And I knew that the ability to successfully implement this plan of widespread vaccination would hinge, or at least should hinge, on the ability to substantiate the injections’ effectiveness in the key realms mentioned above: preventing infection and transmission.
The first company to receive approval, and hence to have a briefing document issued about its product by the FDA, was Pfizer. Shortly after the document was published on December 10th 2020 I read the 53-page document and zeroed in on the section titled “Known Benefits” (p.46) where I found the following three-line summary:
• Reduction in the risk of confirmed COVID-19 occurring at least 7 days after Dose 2
• Reduction in the risk of confirmed COVID-19 after Dose 1 and before Dose 2
• Reduction in the risk of confirmed severe COVID-19 any time after Dose 1
Hmm, that’s funny I thought, there was nothing about the ability to do what government officials and media talking heads were clearly suggesting they would do: stop people from getting infected and passing on the virus.
(Excerpt) Read more at redwave.press ...
I suggest reading the linked article.
The EUA is interesting reading.
BUT, the most interesting part was the author’s attempt to assess why the information he easily found on the Internet had been so completely ignored. It was thought provoking, and could explain at least part of what has gone wrong in our country.
Yes. I think the number of people who simply “don’t read” has dramatically increased. And plenty of people who “do read” simply cannot read well.
Although I would suggest that, in part, the writing style of people like this article’s author may be to blame. His article contains a number of those academic sentences about the praxis of hermaneutic analysis combined with intransigent symbiotic methodologies which provide variable encumbrances to comprehension within the Sapir-Whorf linguistic worldview.
If you write like that, no one will actually pay attention.
So you be sayin dat I be thankin different cause day way I speak?
I think there is little doubt that people nowadays are illiterate primitives compared to the people of a hundred years ago and earlier, before the age of electronic media.
People think they are so smart because they know how to use a cell phone, but their cell phone does most of their thinking for them.
There was no Facebook when William Shakespeare wrote The Tragedy of Hamlet.
There was no Dot Net when Isaac Newton wrote The Principia.
And people actually read them.
Ping
A wealth of information
A Poverty of Knowledge
Dunning Kruger effect
y found on the Internet had been so completely ignored. It was thought provoking, and could explain at least part of what has gone wrong in our country.>>> As a hiring manager, there was once a candidate for a position that was hired not by me. He newly arrived at the office and wanted to sit down with me and go over my systems so he could understand what we did. (My job was to manage the systems that paid all of the Docs and hospitals for a major insurance company). Since i was very busy with system changes and mandates etc. i didn’t have the time to just sit and review my processes with the guy so i suggested he read our very thorough documentation on the main part of the system. and after that i suggested we get together and review, questions etc. He quit. My guess was he couldn’t read.
Thought exercise:
Lets say that you got the polio vaccine, 3 months later the polio booster, and then 3 months later another booster.... and you STILL get polio.
Would you start asking questions then?
“Hmm, that’s funny I thought, there was nothing about the ability to do what government officials and media talking heads were clearly suggesting they would do: stop people from getting infected and passing on the virus.”
What officials were those? Trump’s Operation Warp Speed got the EUA so quickly by looking for only two things:
*adverse effects
*reduction in severe disease
It showed a dramatic decrease in the latter and no increase in the former. We could have delayed several months looking at other results, but these were the only two that really mattered.
What would you have done differently?
Frankly. I don’t think under Trump we would have had mandates. I don’t think he would have mandated the military take it too. There wouldn’t have been a blind push to get kids vaxxed and there would have been some truth in monitoring the effects of the experimental jab. I would have been okay with that.
According to the CDC’s own numbers, the Fauci/China biological warfare virus has a 99.74% survival rate.
75% of the people who died from it had four or more comorbidities.
There were 38,000,000 flu cases the winter of 2019-2020.
There were only 1,800 flu cases the winter of 2020-2021.
There was nothing that needed to be done.
It was just another seasonal flu.
But tyrannical psychopathic hypochondriacs like you wanted to use it to enslave the people you hate.
I agree. While I feel that the science on the vax is very clear that they work and they are safe, I also believe that the government can never force citizens to take a medical treatment.
Being pro-vax but anti-mandate also seems to be Trump’s opinion, and that of most of the American population.
Unfortunately the left has worked hard to categorize everyone who objects to mandates or lockdowns as in the same group as the “viruses are make-believe” crowd.
USA total deaths by year:
2015 - 2,712,630
2016 - 2,744,248
2017 - 2,813,503
2018 - 2,839,205
2019 - 2,854,838
2020 - 3,383,729
What do you think caused 2020 to spike by 500K?
Government interference, and medical malpractice.
The same thing that caused the explosion in hospital profits... The contract killings they conducted by pumping people full of Remdesivir and slapping them on ventilators for $13,000 per diagnosis and $39,000 per ventilator intubation
Not to mention “Meditations” by Marcus Aurelius.
For your theory to be true, every doctor in the country would have to be a murderous psychopath.
Do you even think about what you type before the nonsense spews out through your keyboard?
Would you care to cite your specific source that the "data" be looked at a little more breadth?
As posts detailing the ineptitude and gross malfeasance of the MIH / CDC / FDA are being read on this site, and posts contending all the large "official"data sites are wrong in some way, sources for assertions are always instructive.
As of 29 January 2022, according to worldometers' "official" data,
( 5,669,541 global Covid deaths "officially" / 7,923,543,454 global population ) x 100 = 0.072 %
Less than one tenth of one percent "officially" Covid dead over two years worldwide, says worldometers' data.
So as one possible answer to your question -- "What do you think caused 2020 to spike by 500K?" -- bad data collection methodology and reporting might easily account as a good possiblity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.