“Tests” = The phoney-baloney foundation of the house of COVID cards.
Nothing about this whole covid cluster has been valid so far why should this be any different
Mudbloods? People hopefully make the best data informed decision for themselves.
But for some people, it’s not enough. They have to mock people that did get vaccinated (and the other side does it well - mocks those that don’t get vaccinated).
Pathetic...
Ya don’t say.
“Claiming the CDC did not mean what it plainly wrote that the COVID tests cannot distinguish between the Flu and COVID was clearly political.”
Covid tests cannot detect Flu. They can only detect Covid. Obviously.
The best is yet to come, the long term side effects, deaths from the jab are now no longer able to be hidden. The backlash of Senile Joe’s jab campaign WILL be exposed, hundreds of thousands dead relatives and those suffering side effects hopefully will extract extreme justice upon a corrupted, dirty, immoral, filthy Biden administration. It will be historic.
Soon, there will be another test and additional “studies” indicating the impact of COVID-19 is far worse than what’s been reported, including with OMGicron.
Is anybody ever held accountable anymore? Anyone? Ever?
Are they more “invalid” than the PCR tests?
Yep, I knew it. So to those who arrogantly snub me I am sticking my tongue way out at you... See it?
Better back off, you can’t defend this insanity period. Take your trust in science and government and shove it.
the FDA did not care.
POISONS and TOXINS were to be give to murder
the young, the unborn, the old, and the maim
the rest.
the FDA KNEW. that is why they work at the POISON FACTORIES
growing rich by avoiding labeling.
AVOIDING TRUTHFUL LABELING <=== motto of FDA
They are only coming out with the problems with the tests because they want to remove the weekly test-out option for people who don’t want to get the Notavax.
There is no valid test for Covid. Those PCR tests were used to test the validity of the 'vaccines.' The vaccine trials can't be valid based on fake PCR results.
Pfizer ignored illness in a few thousand trial participants because claiming their PCR tests were negative (I believe they lied). Had Pfizer counted symptomatic people in that excluded group as having Covid, their touted 95% efficacy would have dropped to 19%
But with a negative PCR test, those symptomatic of illness were deemed 'suspected covid' and not counted as actual 'vaccine' efficacy statistics.
Pfizer's 'vaccine' 95% percent efficacy (Relative Risk) was always misleading, and the FDA/NIH/Fauci/CDC/Walenksy were always happy to help that along.
That vax's 95% Relative Risk Reduction is meaningless.
Absolute Risk calculations reflect your real-world reduction in your chance of getting Covid) if vaccinated, and for PFizer's Covid vax, it comes out to less than 1% reduced risk of becoming ill with Covid.
Based on less than 1%, you're either able to hold a job, attend public education, travel, or socialize. Even if every single person in the US was 'vaccinated', it could never reduce overall risk more than 1%.
Now factor in the uncounted sick people in Pfizer's trial, dropping the useless 'Relative Risk" from 95% to 19%.
The real-world reduction of risk to those vaccinated had Pfizer counted sick trial participants (with neg PCR results) would be a tiny, tiny fraction of 1%.
But the PCR actually didn't test for Covid in the first place, so the vaccines were never calibrated with a valid test against an accurate standard - the Covid 'vaccine' trials can't be valid. (Moderna used the PCR too. In its trial documents it avoided naming the PCR and instead referred to 'laboratory testing' and the technical assay name of the test).
CDC Withdraws Use of PCR Test for COVID and Finally Admits the Test Can Not Differentiate Between the Flu and COVID Virus
GP ^ | December 29, 2021 at 9:10am | By Jim Hoft
Posted on 12/29/2021, 10:20:04 AM by Hojczyk
10/26/2021, 5:48:25 PM · by ransomnote · 28 replies
t.me ^ | 10/26/2021 | Anna De Buiscuit, FDA, vanity
ransomnote: Actually, the CDC publicly admitted the PCR doesn't work but decided to keep using the test through December 31 until Bill Gates and George Soros' new testing company can start handling testing. I'm completely serious - the CDC has publicly admitted to continuing to rely on tests it knows are not accurate to give time for the Soros/Gates weaponized testing program to start. :/
FDA document admits “covid” PCR test was developed without isolated covid samples for test calibration, effectively admitting it’s testing something else
fos-sa.org ^ | August 2, 2021 | Naomi Wolf
geez are we a stupid sheeple....
ENJOY you scamdemics out there. you did it....you accomplished what you wanted.... a totalitarian regime based on complete falsehoods....
Are these the tests Brandon got from China?
So many people at CNN busted for degeneracy and pedo stuff, wonder if it is a job requirement
VACCINES DON’T STOP COVID HOSPITALIZATIONS OR DEATHS
They never have, even at peak effectiveness. A huge US database offers proof
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/vaccines-dont-stop-covid-hospitalizations
Even at the peak of their protection earlier in 2021, Covid vaccines barely reduced the risk of hospitalizations in vaccinated people who had “breakthrough” infections, new data show.
Vaccinated people in a study published Tuesday had a nearly 1 in 200 chance of of requiring hospitalization for Covid in the first six months after being “fully vaccinated.”
That stunning risk came even though the median age of people in the study was only 51, and most were relatively healthy.
Deaths, ventilator use, and other severe outcomes also occurred regularly in vaccinated people. The data comes from a study of about 600,000 vaccinated Americans seen at over 100 academic medical centers.
The study was published online Dec. 28 in the Journal of the American Medical Association - JAMA Internal Medicine.
The data in the study also make clear how quickly vaccine protection fades after the second dose - and that the Centers for Disease Control hugely understated the number of vaccinated people hospitalized for Covid earlier this year.
Of the 600,000 fully vaccinated people, about 2,800 required inpatient hospitalization for Covid in the first six months after “full vaccination.” That period starts 14 days after the second dose of mRNA vaccines, when vaccine protection should be at peak.
Almost 3 percent of fully vaccinated people, or 1 in 35, were infected over the first six months, with infection rates accelerating sharply at the end of the study.
In all, 148 of the 600,000 vaccinated people had what the study’s authors called “serious” outcomes from Covid, including ventilation or death, in the first six months after full vaccination.
The study does not reveal how many people were infected or hospitalized for Covid after the first dose or less than two weeks after the second, when rates of infection, hospitalization, and death are known to be even higher.
The stunning figures are buried in a supplemental table of the study, which focused on the post-vaccination risk to a small group of people who have serious immune complications. The paper’s researchers compared infection, hospitalization, and death rates in about 35,000 immune-compromised people with about 570,000 who did not.
Like I said from the beginning of all this, they had no test that was accurate, and knew the tests they were using were invalid, yet they promoted and perpetuated their use. The invalidity of the tests was why I said from the start, that I would never get any Covid shot they tried to push. My specific comment here on FR was: “They don’t even have an accurate test for Covid, so why would I take a vaccine for it?”
And Slow Joe has a half million on the way?
I have been feeling extremely under the weather, today is my fourth day. Last evening I bought a at-home covet test kit and the test turned out positive. Obviously I’m ill with something. I was thinking I just had about the flu. But again the test result came back positive.