Mudbloods? People hopefully make the best data informed decision for themselves.
But for some people, it’s not enough. They have to mock people that did get vaccinated (and the other side does it well - mocks those that don’t get vaccinated).
Pathetic...
Vaccines caused 2x the deaths that covid did in South Korea.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/over-10000-vaccine-deaths-in-south?r=o7iqo
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/south-korea/
“People hopefully make the best data informed decision for themselves”
I agree.
However,
Isn’t that part of the plan.....to divide people?
Nothing new, it’s a tactic that’s been used for centuries.
Personally speaking, I hear or read something every day that reaffirms my decision to refuse these little tested experimental treatments was the right one all along.
Agreed.
The first time I saw the term “mudbloods” was used by a vax shill.
Don’t whine when it’s given back.
The Q-lunatics are now calling themselves Purebloods. The vaxxed are now “mudbloods”.
Sounds vaguely like something Julius Streicher would have cooked up.
Pathetic...
Yep. there are crazies on both sides of this issue.
Pathetic
….some of us are better than that, in labeling adversaries. But given the times, and the NeverEndingDomineeringIsulting Karens that will NOT STFU already, i think it’s not unexpected to be pissed off.
I’d say that calling for internment, incarceration, PUBLIC ridicule, employment and monetary coercion aren’t the same as ‘mocking.’ All of these have been offered up by vaccination proponents - more than just once. Let’s be serious here. There’s NO equivalency here, period.