Replies

PING

There is no valid test for Covid. Those PCR tests were used to test the validity of the 'vaccines.' The vaccine trials can't be valid based on fake PCR results.

Pfizer ignored illness in a few thousand trial participants because claiming their PCR tests were negative (I believe they lied). Had Pfizer counted symptomatic people in that excluded group as having Covid, their touted 95% efficacy would have dropped to 19%

But with a negative PCR test, those symptomatic of illness were deemed 'suspected covid' and not counted as actual 'vaccine' efficacy statistics.

Pfizer's 'vaccine' 95% percent efficacy (Relative Risk) was always misleading, and the FDA/NIH/Fauci/CDC/Walenksy were always happy to help that along.

That vax's 95% Relative Risk Reduction is meaningless.

Absolute Risk calculations reflect your real-world reduction in your chance of getting Covid) if vaccinated, and for PFizer's Covid vax, it comes out to less than 1% reduced risk of becoming ill with Covid.

Based on less than 1%, you're either able to hold a job, attend public education, travel, or socialize. Even if every single person in the US was 'vaccinated', it could never reduce overall risk more than 1%.

Now factor in the uncounted sick people in Pfizer's trial, dropping the useless 'Relative Risk" from 95% to 19%.

The real-world reduction of risk to those vaccinated had Pfizer counted sick trial participants (with neg PCR results) would be a tiny, tiny fraction of 1%.

But the PCR actually didn't test for Covid in the first place, so the vaccines were never calibrated with a valid test against an accurate standard - the Covid 'vaccine' trials can't be valid. (Moderna used the PCR too. In its trial documents it avoided naming the PCR and instead referred to 'laboratory testing' and the technical assay name of the test).

CDC Withdraws Use of PCR Test for COVID and Finally Admits the Test Can Not Differentiate Between the Flu and COVID Virus
GP ^ | December 29, 2021 at 9:10am | By Jim Hoft

Posted on 12/29/2021, 10:20:04 AM by Hojczyk

FDA openly admits that the infamous PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was developed with what appears to be genetic material from a common cold virus.

10/26/2021, 5:48:25 PM · by ransomnote · 28 replies

t.me ^ | 10/26/2021 | Anna De Buiscuit, FDA, vanity

ransomnote: Actually, the CDC publicly admitted the PCR doesn't work but decided to keep using the test through December 31 until Bill Gates and George Soros' new testing company can start handling testing. I'm completely serious - the CDC has publicly admitted to continuing to rely on tests it knows are not accurate to give time for the Soros/Gates weaponized testing program to start. :/

FDA document admits “covid” PCR test was developed without isolated covid samples for test calibration, effectively admitting it’s testing something else
fos-sa.org ^ | August 2, 2021 | Naomi Wolf

BTTT!!!

Yet many sheep continue to dance like monkeys for Fauci & Co.

Actually, the CDC publicly admitted the PCR doesn't work ...

OK, now finish the sentence. The PCR tests don't work to detect the flu virus because they were never designed to. They detect the SARS CoV-2 virus very accurately.

"Not at all. "The reported numbers were based on highly accurate laboratory tests," says Dr. Broadhurst. "The original test could detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 with very high specificity," – meaning the test does its job very well.
A PCR test is an excellent identifier of COVID-19 cases, because of something called specificity. Basically, specificity means that the test is designed to only detect one type of virus. Dr. Broadhurst says, "The PCR test is validated against many different coronaviruses and common respiratory viruses, including influenza so that it would not give false-positive results." Meaning, researchers subjected the test to many different samples to see if it would give the wrong result. It correctly identified SARS-CoV-2 out of all of these samples."

Here's another source:

"confirming a case of COVID-19 depends on the detection of genetic material from the virus on the patient’s fluid by PCR. These PCR tests are specific to SARS-CoV-2 and do not detect other coronaviruses or the influenza virus, which comes from a completely different family of viruses."

Want one more?

But the lab alert does not mean the CDC’s test cannot differentiate between covid and the flu.
In fact, the CDC’s 2019-nCoV RT-PCR test was developed to look for the presence of a nucleic acid found only in the covid virus, said Kelly Wroblewski, director of infectious disease programs at the Association of Public Health Laboratories.
“It is not remotely accurate that the CDC test doesn’t differentiate between flu and SARS-CoV-2. It doesn’t detect influenza. It only detects SARS-CoV-2,” said Wroblewski. “If flu and covid are both circulating, you would be able to detect only SARS-CoV-2 and not flu.”"