Replies

Actually, the CDC publicly admitted the PCR doesn't work ...

OK, now finish the sentence. The PCR tests don't work to detect the flu virus because they were never designed to. They detect the SARS CoV-2 virus very accurately.

"Not at all. "The reported numbers were based on highly accurate laboratory tests," says Dr. Broadhurst. "The original test could detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 with very high specificity," – meaning the test does its job very well.
A PCR test is an excellent identifier of COVID-19 cases, because of something called specificity. Basically, specificity means that the test is designed to only detect one type of virus. Dr. Broadhurst says, "The PCR test is validated against many different coronaviruses and common respiratory viruses, including influenza so that it would not give false-positive results." Meaning, researchers subjected the test to many different samples to see if it would give the wrong result. It correctly identified SARS-CoV-2 out of all of these samples."

Here's another source:

"confirming a case of COVID-19 depends on the detection of genetic material from the virus on the patient’s fluid by PCR. These PCR tests are specific to SARS-CoV-2 and do not detect other coronaviruses or the influenza virus, which comes from a completely different family of viruses."

Want one more?

But the lab alert does not mean the CDC’s test cannot differentiate between covid and the flu.
In fact, the CDC’s 2019-nCoV RT-PCR test was developed to look for the presence of a nucleic acid found only in the covid virus, said Kelly Wroblewski, director of infectious disease programs at the Association of Public Health Laboratories.
“It is not remotely accurate that the CDC test doesn’t differentiate between flu and SARS-CoV-2. It doesn’t detect influenza. It only detects SARS-CoV-2,” said Wroblewski. “If flu and covid are both circulating, you would be able to detect only SARS-CoV-2 and not flu.”"

Re: 34 - Please stop! Too much INFO!

Let’s talk about spoons sticking to people’s injection sites! Please!

THE.COVID.TEST.DOESN’T.WORK.

I’ve posted the inventor’s own words saying that the PCR can’t be used to diagnose disease - it’s a lab tool that exaggerates the presence of material so it can be detected.

All parties involved state they created the PCR without the use of the actual Covid virus.

At the start of the Plandemic, the CDC ‘raced’ to prepare testing kits and delivered millions of contaminated kits, because they didn’t follow their own protocols, lab techs didn’t obey clean room rules, and an open container of coronavirus (not Covid) was in the facility. That means coronavirus confounds the test - not Covid.

Also, the president of Tanzania proved that the PCR tested positive on fruit and inconclusive on Motor oil. The PCR is not specific to Covid and then they intentionally ran it well above 25 cycles (often 35 to 40) rendering it meaningless. It’s just a propaganda tool.

You’re the only one left saying the test works when it doesn’t it. It can’t.

Don’t spoil their story, dammit.

If you start posting what the CDC is really doing how will Team Q’s fear porn work? Do Not Post Stuff Like This:

Is CDC retiring the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel because it has produced inaccurate results?

No. There are no performance concerns with this test. The CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel is a highly accurate test. It has been used to successfully detect SARS-CoV-2 since February 2020.

Since the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel continues to perform well, CDC will continue to make the design of the primers and probes used in the CDC 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel publicly available on the CDC website. Laboratories and test developers are free to use the design in their own research or diagnostic test.

https://www.cdc.gov/csels/dls/locs/2021/08-02-2021-lab-alert-Clarifications_about_Retirement_CDC_2019_Novel_Coronavirus_1.html