Chemerinsky supports gun control and disagreed with the decision in District of Columbia v. Heller....Chemerinsky believes that Roe v. Wade was correctly decided...Chemerinsky also represents a client held at the Guantanamo Bay detention center...He supports affirmative action...In January 2017, Chemerinsky, along with other high-profile lawyers, sued President Donald Trump for refusing to "divest from his businesses"... In an opinion piece following the 2020 presidential election, Chemerinsky wrote that "the Electoral College makes no sense as a way for a democracy to choose a president."
I'll bet he is ‘pro-choice’ when it comes to abortion.
They just haven’t met my price point of twice my wages, indexed to inflation, for life.
Why are going so cheap on me?
“Judgement at Nuremberg” comes to mind.
Looks like a Jerry Lewis character.
Mandate anything you want.
Expect some high speed rejection notices.
His hero is Joseph Mengele—kinda obvious.
And what if a muslim objected to the vaccine mandate?
>> Laws that require vaccination are the epitome of a neutral law of general applicability
BS, ya’ opiniated idiot.
He is a far left loon.
Almost a USSC Judge. Thank goodness he did not make it.
They aren’t vaccines.
They don’t work.
Yeah, i’ve been awate of this guy for awhile.
He’s a tenured fool.
These policies are essential to protect public health. The virulent Delta variant of the corona-virus has made it imperative to ensure vaccination of as many people as possible.
And therein lies the problem: this isn't a vaccine. This is an analgesic to reduce the severity of infection. It does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING about promoting "public health," because The Jab does not reduce the incidence of infection, nor does it block transmission of the infection to others.
The growing number of news reports of people having "breakthrough infection" is in and itself a lie, as there is nothing "breakthrough" about it. If the censorship were lifted so this could be discussed, as per the scientific method, the actual utility of the various jabs would be better understood.
Isn’t Erwin Chemerinsky one of Hugh Hewitt’s “smart guy” buddies?
His argument is based on the false premise that the vaccine stops the spread of the virus. The fact that vaccinated people can still infect others is proof that his premise is false. His argument is unsound. He probably knows this and is simply lying.
I only read a tiny bit of this doofus' screed, but what I read, confirms his ignorance. He states: "The VIRULENT Delta variant of the coronavirus has made it imperative to ensure vaccination of as many people as possible." (emphasis mine)
The 'Delta variant' hit the UK months before it hit North America. Results there suggest that it is perhaps MORE CONTAGIOUS but MUCH LESS VIRULENT! Cases are increasing, as are hospital visits, but ICU and MORTALITY RATES remain the same or ARE DROPPING! This idiot doesn'tunderstand the difference betwen'contagiousness' and 'virulence'.
Of course, MOST in the 'legal profession' and most 'educators' INDOCTRINATORS are atheist, so any attack on Christianity is to be expected.
Oh, and BTW, Mr. Professor, you can KMA!
Sad state of laws schools when a clown like this is the dean. Deam Wormer has more competence and more concern for civil rights, even with double secret probation.
The virulent Delta variant of the coronavirus has made it imperative to ensure vaccination of as many people as possible.
—
This moron is obviously already vaccinated, but obviously doesn’t think the vaccine provides him sufficient protection from the virus. So he wants everyone vaccinated even though it won’t protect them from getting the virus.
The article misses the point.
The objection is to those vaccines that use abortion cell lines in any capacity.
I have no objections to vaccines in a general sense.
I have objections to vaccines that use murdered babies in any capacity.