REPORT: Ashli Babbitt’s Killer Was Secret Service Agent Assigned To Mike Pence

As Americans fight to identify the man who shot and killed of Ashli Babbitt, whose identity has remained hidden from the public, a report from the Spectator suggests that her murderer was a Secret Service agent assigned to the disgraced former Vice President Mike Pence.

Many Americans have been led to believe that Capitol Police were responsible for the horrific execution of the unarmed veteran patriot, Ashli Babbitt, during the chaotic event at the US Capitol building on January 6. However, a new report from the Spectator suggests that her killer was a member of the United States Secret Service on security detail for former Vice President Mike Pence.

The report, titled Who killed Ashli Babbitt? says “sources close to and within the intelligence community tell Cockburn that Babbitt was actually shot by a member of then-vice president Mike Pence’s protective detail. The VP’s detail, of course, is provided by US Secret Service, not the Capitol Police. One person asserted to Cockburn over drinks in DC that this is ‘basically an open secret’ in the intelligence community.”

According to the Spectator report, “law enforcement sources suggested that the Capitol Police Department and Department of Justice have publicly identified the shooter as a Capitol Police officer in order to protect the reputation of the Secret Service.”

The Spectator suggests that the government has not been open and honest about the killer’s identity due to these revelations.

secret service use of force policy

https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/mgmt/law-enforcement/mgmt-dir_044-05-department-policy-on-the-use-of-force.pdf

III. General Principles
A. Respect for Human Life
All DHS personnel have been entrusted with a critical mission: safeguarding the
American people, our homeland, and our values. In keeping with this mission, respect
for human life and the communities we serve shall continue to guide DHS LEOs in the
performance of their duties.
2 Graham, 490 U.S. at 396. The Court has further determined that a Fourth Amendment “seizure” of a person occurs when an
officer, “by means of physical force or show of authority, terminates or restrains his freedom of movement through means
intentionally applied (emphasis in original).” Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249, 254 (2007)(citations omitted). 3 Graham. (citing Garner, 471 U.S at 8-9: “[T]he question is ‘whether the totality of the circumstances justifie[s] a particular sort
of . . . seizure’”). The “totality of the circumstances” refers to all factors surrounding a particular use of force. In Graham, the
Court lists three factors, often referred to as the “Graham factors,” that may be considered in assessing reasonableness: the
severity of the crime/offense at issue, whether the subject poses an immediate threat to the safety of the LEO or others, and
whether the subject is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight. Other factors include, but are not limited to:
the presence and number of other LEOs, subjects, and bystanders; the size, strength, physical condition, and level of training of
the LEO(s); the apparent size, strength, physical condition, and level of training of the subject(s); whether an individual is
forcibly assaulting, resisting, opposing, impeding, intimidating, or interfering with a LEO while the LEO is engaged in, or on
account of the performance of, official duties; proximity and type of weapon(s) present; criminal or mental health history of the
subject(s) known to the LEO at the time of the use of force; and the perceived mental/emotional state of the subject.
4 Id.
5 Other than the force reasonably required to properly restrain a subject and safely move him or her from point to point. That is,
once the subject is secured with restraints, a LEO may maintain physical control of the subject via the use of “come-along or
other control techniques” to safely and securely conclude the incident.
B. De-escalation
To ensure that DHS LEOs are proficient in a variety of techniques that could aid them in
appropriately resolving an encounter, DHS Components shall provide use of force
training that includes de-escalation tactics and techniques.
C. Use of Safe Tactics
DHS LEOs should seek to employ tactics and techniques that effectively bring an
incident under control while promoting the safety of LEOs and the public, and that
minimize the risk of unintended injury or serious property damage. DHS LEOs should
also avoid intentionally and unreasonably placing themselves in positions in which they
have no alternative to using deadly force.
D. Additional Considerations
1. DHS LEOs are permitted to use force that is reasonable in light of the
totality of the circumstances. This standard does not require LEOs to meet force
with equal or lesser force.

2. DHS LEOs do not have a duty to retreat to avoid the reasonable use of
force, nor are they required to wait for an attack before using reasonable force to
stop a threat.

E. Warnings
1. When feasible, prior to the application of force, a DHS LEO must attempt
to identify him- or herself and issue a verbal warning to comply with the LEO’s
instructions. In determining whether a warning is feasible under the
circumstances, a LEO may be guided by a variety of considerations including, but
not limited to, whether the resulting delay is likely to:
a. Increase the danger to the LEO or others, including any victims
and/or bystanders;
b. Result in the destruction of evidence;
c. Allow for a subject’s escape; or
d. Result in the commission of a crime.
2. In the event that a LEO issues such a warning, where feasible, the LEO
should afford the subject a reasonable opportunity to voluntarily comply before
applying force.
3

F. Exigent Circumstances
In an exigent situation, for self-defense or the defense of another, DHS LEOs are
authorized to use any available object or technique in a manner that is reasonable in light
of the circumstances.
G. Medical Care
As soon as practicable following a use of force and the end of any perceived public safety
threat, DHS LEOs shall obtain appropriate medical assistance for any subject who has
visible or apparent injuries, complains of being injured, or requests medical attention.
This may include rendering first aid if properly trained and equipped to do so, requesting
emergency medical services, and/or arranging transportation to an appropriate medical
facility.
H. Duty to Intervene In and Report Improper Use of Force
1. The Department is committed to carrying out its mission with honor and
integrity, and to fostering a culture of transparency and accountability. As such,
DHS law enforcement Components will ensure that their policies and procedures
unambiguously underscore the following:
The use of excessive force is unlawful and will not be tolerated. Those who
engage in such misconduct, and those who fail to report such misconduct,
will be subject to all applicable administrative and criminal penalties.
2. DHS LEOs have a duty to intervene to prevent or stop a perceived use of
excessive force by another LEO—except when doing so would place the
observing/responding LEO in articulable, reasonable fear of death or serious
bodily injury.

Could be an attempt from either or both sides to make sure Pence is damaged beyond compare to prevent a run in 2024 or beyond.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pence is already damaged beyond repair. He threw Gen Flynn under the bus, lied about it and watched that farce unfold for a few years. He watched them try to frame President Trump for the Ukranian phone call without ever saying, “Oh by the way, I routinely talk with the Ukranian minister alone”.
He then watches in silence as the election is stolen. He punts instead of upholding his duty to defend America from enemies foreign and domestic.

He prestends he’s unaware that suitcases of fake ballots were dragged out from beneath tables and thousands of poll workers were coming forward attesting to fraud. Instead he gives the fake Biden steal his full blessing, skipping President Trump’s departure ceremony to attend Biden’s swearing in farce. He has maintained this farce up to the present - hasn’t said a word about ‘getting to the truth’ or noticing AZ. He’s a deep state man all the way.

In 2016, there were those few awkward says where PenceRyan2016 was a registered domain as those two idiots wanted to take advantage of what they thought would be Trump’s failure in the debates.

Pence is spineless and serves only himself. Accordingto a whistleblower, Pence and Pelosi ‘ran’ the Jan 6 operation to falsely portray riots. What has Pence said about the Jan 6 riots? He threw MAGA under the bus and acted like it’s just the kind of thing he hates to see MAGA do.

Supposedly, the FBI ‘swooped’ all communications Jan 6 so now Pence and Pelosi answer to the FBI or their efforts to coordinate what they hoped would be a massacre on Jan 6 will be exposed. This explains that odd little scene where Pelosi approaches the cameras with a female security guard beside her who snarls, “Don’t say anything!” and Nancy says, demurely, “I won’t.” What a switch! Nancy’s Praetorian guard, comprised of intel agency types, used to help her run the capital and now Nancy’s controlled. Couldn’t happen to nicer fiends.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.