Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden DOJ Wins Lawsuit to Seize 260-Year-Old Texas Ranch Along Border
Breitbart ^ | 04/15/2021 | Bob Price

Posted on 04/15/2021 12:22:30 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27

They owned the property since before the existence of the
United States.


41 posted on 04/15/2021 12:49:08 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Folks, if you haven't yet, please start an automatic monthly for Jim and his crew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shotgun
That still is a nice $390,000 check from Uncle Sugar...

They're only seizing around 7 acres, which is a little over $10K.

And for that you get a wall through your property cutting part of it off from the river.

42 posted on 04/15/2021 12:49:29 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

I don’t know. But they got it. Maybe they’ll build a welcome facility.


43 posted on 04/15/2021 12:49:58 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Nominated by George W. Bush on June 16, 2004.........................


44 posted on 04/15/2021 12:50:51 PM PDT by Red Badger ("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

They won an easement to place the wall along the border. They didn’t take the whole ranch. IF Biden puts up puts up the wall, it will make the ranch a safer place.
This is normal and perfectly reasonable.


45 posted on 04/15/2021 12:50:59 PM PDT by Little Ray (Corporations don't pay taxes. They collect them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
They owned the property since before the existence of the United States.

Who owned it before that?

46 posted on 04/15/2021 12:51:42 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
The government still wanted that land condemned. The Cavazos family and their attorneys had hoped the 46th president would stand by his August 2020 words and stop fighting in court for Trump’s border wall. But Biden didn’t do that. The lawsuits were not withdrawn.

Suckers!.............................

47 posted on 04/15/2021 12:52:42 PM PDT by Red Badger ("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27
Citing the government’s need for “urgency of possession,” the district court held that the Biden administration “is entitled to immediate possession of the Subject Property.”

Oh, and how does a case that's been languishing since the Bush administration suddenly have "urgency" of possession after at least a decade after being filed?

-PJ

48 posted on 04/15/2021 12:52:52 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (* LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
The government still wanted that land condemned. The Cavazos family and their attorneys had hoped the 46th president would stand by his August 2020 words and stop fighting in court for Trump’s border wall. But Biden didn’t do that. The lawsuits were not withdrawn.
49 posted on 04/15/2021 12:53:24 PM PDT by Red Badger ("We've always been at war with Climate Change, Winston."..............................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Actually Trump is going to need that land in 2025.

Good ruling.


50 posted on 04/15/2021 12:54:44 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping List )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

United States v. Haley. Haley seven, USA zero. See it can be done!


51 posted on 04/15/2021 12:59:55 PM PDT by monkeyshine (live and let live is dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

How did Biden get this case through the courts so fast?

He has only been in office for 100 days and usually court cases take years to make their way through trial and a decision.


52 posted on 04/15/2021 1:04:49 PM PDT by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Maybe they’ll build a welcome facility.

Yours is the most likely answer. Welcome facilities, complete with cold water, toilets, free food, hotel rooms and clothing. And Democrat party pamphlets in Spanish.

53 posted on 04/15/2021 1:05:49 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

I won’t get played by people on the border who want to use their land as a highway for Illegal Immigration, so I’m PERFECTLY HAPPY to see that as federal land, and hopefully we can seal it off now.


54 posted on 04/15/2021 1:06:03 PM PDT by BobL (TheDonald.win is now Patriots.win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: semimojo
Just reading some posts on the source site it looks like maybe bad journalism. Maybe they seized just enough for an easement to build the wall. Maybe they only needed 77 acres of the whole amount. It may be cutting off land across the river on the Mexican side. If the land straddles the river, a wall could make the Mexican land useless.

There is much we don't know for sure. If it's to build the wall, GREAT! But I doubt very seriously if it will amount to 6500 acres.

55 posted on 04/15/2021 1:20:09 PM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
Maybe they only needed 77 acres of the whole amount.

According to the WAPO the entire ranch is down to 77 acres and the government can seize 6.6 acres of that - just enough to complete the wall.

56 posted on 04/15/2021 1:30:42 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519
Good grief!
That means this is a fake news headline...
An easement of less than 4% of the property against the property owner to build the wall seems justified...
IMHO...
57 posted on 04/15/2021 1:31:20 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another Samuel Adams now that we desperately need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
...it will make the ranch a safer place.

Kind of depends which side of the wall they'll be on.

58 posted on 04/15/2021 1:32:34 PM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: semimojo

They have doors in these walls. Access to the other side is available.


59 posted on 04/15/2021 1:33:03 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps; Arrowhead1952; NYTexan; mylife; Eaker; TheMom; laurenmarlowe; El Gato; RebelTex; ...
Texas land grab
60 posted on 04/15/2021 1:35:55 PM PDT by luvie (The bravery and dedication of our troops in keeping us safe & free make me proud to be an American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson