Posted on 12/11/2020 11:55:42 PM PST by RandFan
Rudy Giuliani:
“The case wasn’t rejected on the merits, the case was rejected on standing. So the answer to that is to bring the case now to the district court by the president, by some of the electors, alleging some of the same facts where there would be standing,” he said in a Friday interview on Newsmax.
“There’s nothing that prevents us from filing these cases immediately in the district court in which the president of course would have standing, some of the electors would have standing in that their constitutional rights have been violated,” he added.
“We’re not finished,” he concluded. "Believe me.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
l8r
The Democrats have been lying about there being no actual affidavit-backed-up evidence, but they have also been dismissive with regard to the statistical evidence.
I don't believe the justices will be as dismissive as the MSM.
....that, after careful study and consideration, think you got “screwed”, something which will hurt them also. Many others likewise join the suit but, within a flash, it is thrown out and gone, without even looking at the many reasons it was brought. A Rigged Election, fight on!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) December 12, 2020
bookmark
AND keep praying for God's Divine Intervention giving Him All Glory and Honor.
Knock’em dead Rudy!
Amen. Need prayers all over the place!
>> Keep your spirits up, Freepers...
Definitely.
I wouldn’t even let Rudy represent me in court for a traffic violation even pro-bono. He is missing too many brain cells. Theres no excuse for not knowing it would not have standing. Newsmax and other sites knew it. He wasted valuble time for nothing. Mr. President please find someone smarter than Rudy, heck a wino or crack head off the street would probably do better.
They drew first blood.
Kinda oily. That’s calamari and...baby octopus?
I wish, but let’s be honest: they don’t want any part of this. The 3 Trump judges denying standing was basically a recusal. Also, to rule in favor of Trump would probably put their and their family’s lives in danger. Schumer already threatened Kavanaugh after he was confirmed. Intimidation works.
We’re at war, folks. The supreme court is not going to fight our battles for us.
Have DJT file in District Court where he does have standing.
Dershowitz says the Supremes simply do not want to touch this.
__State Legislatures wont or can’t act.
__State Courts punt.
__Federal Courts dismiss.
__Supremes deny standing.
That leaves executive action. They made him go there.
"Meet and greet",January 12 2021,Capitol Building,Austin,Texas
It’s over UNLESS Trump has the gonads to invoke the Insurrection Act and declare martial law .
Yes!!!! Rudy’s BACK and he’s right! Courts, includingSCOTUS, cannot deny scientific statistical evidence! It’s cut and dried!
Go Rudy!
yes, they struck first blood, which turns out to be that they actually cut themselves and are now profusely bleeding their credibility as the nine oath keepers...
except for Thomas
Elections and courts don’t seem to be working very well. Could be because the system only works for one side.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.