Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RandFan

I wouldn’t even let Rudy represent me in court for a traffic violation even pro-bono. He is missing too many brain cells. Theres no excuse for not knowing it would not have standing. Newsmax and other sites knew it. He wasted valuble time for nothing. Mr. President please find someone smarter than Rudy, heck a wino or crack head off the street would probably do better.


11 posted on 12/12/2020 12:19:29 AM PST by TonyM (Score Event)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TonyM

You are an ass


25 posted on 12/12/2020 12:59:31 AM PST by antceecee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TonyM

>> He is missing too many brain cells.

Nonsense.

>> Theres no excuse for not knowing it would not have standing.

Nonsense

>> a wino or crack head off the street would probably do better.

Nonsense

Lashing out in frustration solves nothing — but unfortunately, you’re in good company.

Accept that fact we’ll go to our graves fighting. And that no single individual is responsible for the saving the Country. Wake up every day knowing that we’re at war — and find a way to keep the peace at home while having unwavering commitment to fight the adversary.

Giuliani is a good man. Don’t besmirch his integrity because you’re not satisfied. There will be no satisfaction in our lifetime.


38 posted on 12/12/2020 1:31:34 AM PST by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TonyM

“Theres no excuse for not knowing it would not have standing.”

Of course the case had standing! SCOTUS majority wants Trump gone the same as other libs, and “standing” is a legal default cop-out.


39 posted on 12/12/2020 1:33:18 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ("Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free" Galatians 5:1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TonyM

Dude: This lawsuit was filed by the state of Texas, not the Trump campaign.


47 posted on 12/12/2020 1:46:11 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TonyM

I agree 100 % , and sadly sydney has not shown me a thing yet ...........Todays rally in dc will be the last of what i watch Im burnt out ...but Realistic


51 posted on 12/12/2020 1:53:59 AM PST by norinosforme (am i nuts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TonyM

You sir, are a dolt. The case before SCOTUS was brought by Texas, not Rudi.


53 posted on 12/12/2020 1:56:01 AM PST by Flick Lives (#resist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TonyM

Ummm...Rudy had nothing to do with the TX suit.

OTH, if you are going to file get to filing. I am thinking it should have already been done to get the process started.


66 posted on 12/12/2020 3:55:39 AM PST by Adder ("Can you be more stupid?" is a question, not a challenge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TonyM

I wouldn’t even let Rudy represent me in court for a traffic violation even pro-bono. He is missing too many brain cells. Theres no excuse for not knowing it would not have standing. Newsmax and other sites knew it. He wasted valuble time for nothing. Mr. President please find someone smarter than Rudy, heck a wino or crack head off the street would probably do better.
**********************************************************************************
This case was not filed by Rudy it was filed by the Texas AG-Paxton. The President joined the suit and that was filed by John Eastman-not Rudy.


68 posted on 12/12/2020 3:59:03 AM PST by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TonyM

Shut up Liberal IDIOT!!


72 posted on 12/12/2020 4:17:01 AM PST by afchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TonyM

Then there’s the anti Rudys

He was talking about the case brought to the court by Ken Paxton with Ted Cruz who previously won 9 cases before the Supreme Court

Like at the bridge with the nasty troll, “Let ME try, this is easy”. “what’s your favorite color?” “Blue!, no, no red! Aaahhrhh”


88 posted on 12/12/2020 5:03:52 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TonyM

Tony you have no idea what your talking about. Rudy is fine. Relax .


94 posted on 12/12/2020 5:12:01 AM PST by BillyCuccio (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TonyM

TonyM,

Two of the nine Justices felt it had standing.....

A lot of the State AG’s believed there was a shot but also knew there was a strong chance it would be rejected.....

Guliani didn’t bring this suit.....

His job is as an advocate for the President which is always to present the “sunny-side”.....

If you could have asked him off-the-record he would have told you it only had a slim chance.

A case like this takes years of preparation, investigations, depositions, testimony, and hearings to present. Guliani had 4 weeks...

Some of what Guliani has done is throwing thinly prepared suits to different courts as both a political and somewhat veiled legal strategy to get traction in both places.

A fair criticism of Guliani is that his public persona as a PR strategist is not the best. But in the courtroom, he is well respected.

Understand your frustration but your assessment of Guliani is way off, also note he has a staff of many attorneys and law clerks working this closely with him.

Also remember, the President has full confidence in him and could have easily removed him at any time. Donald Trump will fire anyone if he believes they aren’t effective at the drop of a hat. He has no allegiances for inefficiencies...

NeverGore


98 posted on 12/12/2020 5:19:39 AM PST by nevergore (I have a terrible rash on my covfefe....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: TonyM

Who would have approached this the same way for what would be a case they would HAVE to take, being about Original Construction clauses, deep in the Constitution. Read Clarence Thomas’s descent. They should have taken the case and ruled on it— but their criminal handlers (whom Rudy knows quite well- and the legal paths of RICO) threatened them, led by Justice “Malat Boy” Roberts.


112 posted on 12/12/2020 6:04:05 AM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson