I got news for the criminal globalist thugs.
Romans 8:31 What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against.
RAINBOW OVER THE WHITE HOUSE, THIS MORNING 12/1/20
Posted on 12/01/2020 6:41:40 AM PST by SeekAndFind
There are landslides and then there are landslides. There are lopsided votes and then there are lopsided votes. There are egregious examples of vote manipulation and then there are really egregious examples of vote manipulation. What surfaced during hearings in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, on November 25, 2020, may set the standard for electoral outrageousness. An expert testifying to the Pennsylvania Senate flagged a batch of ballots that recorded some 570,000 votes for Joe Biden and only 3,200 for Donald Trump.
Yes, you read that correctly. That would equate to Joe Biden bagging 99.4 percent of that enormous chunk of votes. That one batch alone would have flipped the state to Biden.
This bombshell was dropped last Wednesday at the Wyndham Hotel in Gettysburg. The November 25 hearings, which began at 12:30 p.m. and ran for nearly four hours, were convened at the request of Sen. Doug Mastriano (R-Adams, Cumberland, Franklin, and York counties). It was sponsored by the Senate Majority Policy Committee, chaired by Sen. David Argall (R-Berks/Schuylkill). Mastriano has called what happened “unacceptable,” and has called for the resignation of Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar.
This particular gem was provided by Ret. Col. Phil Waldren, a former combat officer with a background in Army information and electronic warfare. Waldren, who testified along with Rudy Giuliani’s team, brought to the hearing his considerable expertise in analysis of election-data fraud. After Waldren presented his material, the chair opened the floor for questions. Rudy Giuliani went first, asking Waldren to clarify what his analytics team means when they talk about “spike anomalies” in voting patterns. These, as Waldren defines them, are “events where a numerical amount of votes are processed in a time period that is not feasible or mechanically possible under normal circumstances.”
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
It is a coup! And the RINOs are just as bad as the Democrats! A sad state of affairs for this country! And the RINOs think we should support them in GA after what they are doing to the President.
RE: These are not vote totals from voting machines. They are the edison feeds to the NYT.
And where did Edison get its voting data from?
Stalinesque 99.4% for Biden!
When are people going to start to get upset, and demand action?
I got news for the criminal globalist thugs.
Romans 8:31 What shall we then say to these things? If God be for us, who can be against.
RAINBOW OVER THE WHITE HOUSE, THIS MORNING 12/1/20
When dso we start calling Biden “Dear Leader”. Because those are “Kim” margins of victory.
bttt
Yeah, Biden did better than Obama (who got around 98% black support.)
I find that difficult to believe.
If Trump is elected on Jan 20th, it will be indoors because the smoke from the streets will be too much for the average person’s eyes to take.
If he ends up getting the states to change their electors, the left will lose their collective shit.
Why didn’t the Trump team request a recount? They did that in Georgia, Wisconsin etc. Graphs can have spikes if the data is reported from a large voting area (ex. Philly suburbs) and added to the total. It is not as if there is only one counting place, as every precinct is counting their votes independently. About the 99% Biden votes claim, he should share details on how he came up with that number. Lots of people throwing numbers and statistics around with very little substantiation.
I am confused about the Edison feed. The NYT said that feed is based directly on reporting from the various states so they are official numbers as they are tallied. Others have stated that Edison compiles the numbers themselves.
I do not know.
However, many of the data analysts that I have watched have broken down reporting by the hour (as done by this guy at the hearing) so how or why would they be inaccurate?
President Trump had a MASSIVE lead in PA when I went to bed. I woke up early the following morning and it had been erased.
I am generally a skeptic and I have tried to look at the data myself because there is so much disinformation and crap flying around (even on Trump’s legal team).
However, based on what I have looked at from what I consider to be reputable sources (Braynard and Baris) there is a huge shift in the ratio of votes towards Biden. Biden had a winning ratio in Philly prior to the “shut-down”, but it was NOT going to be enough. After the shut-down his ratio greatly increased far beyond what the mail-in ballots had shown prior to that and completely out of whack with similar precincts around the country.
Correct me if I am wrong here - I want the truth.
Demonrat Response: “Nothing to see here. Move along!”
The audience gasped in astonishment when that disparity was revealed.
Biden will always be branded as a cheater. He stole and cheated throughout his life.
Why didn’t the Trump team request a recount? They did that in Georgia, Wisconsin etc. Graphs can have spikes if the data is reported from a large voting area (ex. Philly suburbs) and added to the total.
I know Trump has requested a re-count in numerous states. My point is why isn’t biden more vocal in demanding same?
Doing so would validate this election and prove to everyone’s satisfaction that he won. Instead we will have this poisoned process elect another illegitimate President. An honest man would demand fairness and transparency, obviously a characteristic missing from bidens DNA.
And, of course, no chain of custody available for these “ballots”...
More likely relegate Biden to the dustbin of history.
Like so much of the last 4 years, Trump’s strategy has been deeply flawed in that it relied too heavily on getting principled action from cowards and thieves.
Along the same lines, we have Biden's well-known statement about putting together an "enormous fraud organization".
They say that this was (of course) a mere slip of the tongue. What Joe meant (obviously!) is that he had put together a vast ANTI-fraud organization.
Well … let's see it … what's it doing? Seems like there are concerns about this election and, you know, maybe Joe's organization should step up and help resolve the concerns.
“ If Trump is inaugurated on Jan 20”
If it even appeared that that would happen, Trump would not be among the living by the time we arrived there. One thing about the Democrat Left, they take action, take the initiative and leave no stone unturned. Wish I could say that about our side.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.