Posted on 11/24/2020 4:50:47 AM PST by Oshkalaboomboom
Tucker Carlson opened his show Monday night claiming the 2020 election was ‘rigged’ against Trump in plain view, as he accused Democrats of colluding with the media and big tech companies to bend the contest in Biden's favor.
The claims came as part of a lengthy monologue by the Fox News host just hours after Trump took a massive step towards admitting defeat in the election by announcing he was allowing the transition to Joe Biden to begin.
Carlson called the election ‘not fair’ and said that ‘the system was rigged against one candidate and in favor of another… in ways that were not hidden from view.’
‘The 2020 election was not fair,’ he reiterated. ‘No honest person would claim that it was.’
The top-ranking cable news host began by arguing that electronic voting systems are unreliable and called for a return to hand-counting paper ballots without the use of machines.
Carlson made the argument following a week in which he blasted attorney Sidney Powell - who was disavowed from Trump’s legal team on Sunday – for failing to provide evidence to back up her claims that Dominion Voting Systems were being manipulated to flip Trump votes for Biden.
‘You’ve heard a lot over the past few days about the security of our electronic voting machines. And this is a real issue, no matter who raises it or who tries to dismiss it out of hand as a conspiracy theory,’ Carlson said.
‘Electronic voting is not as secure as traditional hand-counting, period. It never will be as secure. Voters can see this because it’s obvious, and it makes them nervous.’
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Conservatives are going to be outraged at the double standard and how they’re victims all the way to the Gulag.
Took him 3 weeks to say it.
Who?
In black and white-——printed in the Dominion manual:
<><> The Dominion tallying system is engineered with a WEIGHTED VOTE option.
<><> You enter a percentage that you want to apply to votes in a particular race;
<><> Dominion machines will increase the vote total by that percentage.
Is this used for anything else but to steal elections?
Kamala Harris’ 3 degrees of separation to Smartmatic / FR Posted by Lockbox
1 - Kamala Harris’ husband, Douglas Emhoff, is a Partner of DLA Piper Global Law Firm.
2 - Sir Nigel Knowles is a Director of SGO and is former Global Co-Chairman and Senior Partner of DLA Piper.
3 - SGO owns Smartmatic
SGO is built on the extraordinary success of Smartmatic SGO is an investor in Smartmatic
Smartmatic spins off new parent company, SGO, with British lord (Excerpt) Read more at none.org ...
They had to resort to on-the-spot engineering to get a rough alignment between
(A) the fraudulent paper ballots pouring in, and, (B) the in-place software fraud.
Let’s get the word out——the USSC does NOT have to overturn an election. Donald won enormously from the get-go.
The USSC has only to rule on (A) the fraudulent Biden ballots, and, (B) the software fraud.
As in Bush/Gore, the USSC ruled voters were denied “equal protection”....since some voters were giving privileges other voters did not.
FR POSTED----Dominion's ’18 Patents’ and ‘Intellectual Property Rights’ were exchanged on September 25, 2019 for Collateral from the People’s Republic of China's HongKong Shanghai Banking Corporation ---includes Patent Numbers, Descriptions, Collateral Security Agreement..... plus more ....
The FoxNews Crisis Team in action!!
In the last posted ratings report he lost out to 6 cable news shows, including Anderson Cooper in the same time slot
In a yet unexplained move, states including Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin stopped releasing vote counts on election night.
Fact-checkers have noted that these states didn’t stop counting.....but not WHY they stopped releasing the results of their counting.
At the time the states inexplicably stopped releasing vote numbers, Trump’s vote was so overwhelming it broke their algorhythms.
They had to go in and do a separate reset to (a) back-fill votes for Biden, (b) delete Trump votes, and, (c) create new Biden votes.
At 4 a.m. the next morning, huge amounts of fresh Biden votes were reported. Trump’s betting odds plummeted,
and days later the all-knowing, “ask no questions” MSM declared Biden to be president-elect.
The phrase "an issue" is Orwellian.
It's an f'n fraud. It's felonious. It's a travesty. It's a coup.
Does Carlson really understand what he's looking at? Of all people, he should, but I think not.
There was plenty of proof that something was wrong before Powell got involved. Tucker chose to denigrate her instead of spending an hour to look into the already available information that something was very wrong with this election.
Too bad Tucker.
You won’t get me back from Newsmax and OAN.
Which means he's just doing damage control. Now if he were to break a significant investigative news report of some kind about what went on behind the scenes in any of the several states involved, that might be worth a look.
Fox is a NEWS network, isn't it?
No? OK, so long as we're clear about it.
Or each of those states only start counting mail in votes on the day of the election. Counting mail in ballots takes time. Also we knew more democrats were going to vote by mail than republicans.
No grand conspiracy needed.
https://ballotpedia.org/When_states_can_begin_processing_and_counting_absentee/mail-in_ballots,_2020
Aw. Tucker must want us back. So sad.
I’ve not viewed Tucker since Nov. 4th. I agree that he should skeedaddle from Faux News. But I think Tucker is between a rock and a hard place. I believe there is a “Shall not compete” clause in his contract. If he breaks his contract and leaves before fulfilling it, he is legally forbidden to work for any other network for some specified number of years. So he’s desperately trying to make the best of a bad situation.
Who..? Some guy from Fox> Go away quisling.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again.
If the CEO of Dominion and the software developers came forward and testified under oath that they transferred votes from Trump to Biden in an amount to give Biden the win, and provided all the evidence to prove it, I highly doubt it would matter.
First the media would poo poo the testimony as being fabricated, and you’d never get a judge to make a ruling.
The fix is in. I hope I’m wrong, but Marxists don’t play by the rules.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.