Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeInPA
Tucker works for the enemy. I will not view him. Yeah, how dare Tucker act like a journalist and ask for proof. Wasn't that the reason we were pissed and MSNBC/CNN and the rest of them during the Russian collusion hoax? Remember when they just aired the allegations and did not ask for proof.
24 posted on 11/24/2020 5:17:22 AM PST by Sir_Humphrey (Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people -Socrates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Sir_Humphrey

There was plenty of proof that something was wrong before Powell got involved. Tucker chose to denigrate her instead of spending an hour to look into the already available information that something was very wrong with this election.


33 posted on 11/24/2020 5:24:36 AM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Sir_Humphrey
You don't follow things closely and Tucker doesn't either. Powell and Giuliani were very clear at their presser that the bulk of their evidence was going to be presented in court and that doing so before hand endangered witnesses. However, they did provide an excellent overview into their case and with several affidavits. Tucker ignored that. Powell even sent another affidavit to Tucker before he had his hissy fit. Additionally, she referred a statistician to Tucker that could explain thing better than she. Tucker ignored that. He ignored what was said in the press conference. The press conference and its salient contents went uncovered.

Tucker and his Faux News colleagues needs to put on their big boy pants and actually investigate things instead of relying on hand outs. Have you heard one investigative report on election fraud from Faux News that was original? Tucker works for a leftist news organization. He is the enemy.

43 posted on 11/24/2020 5:32:10 AM PST by ConservativeInPA (The Republic is at a pivot point. Either you stand for freedom or die in slavery. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: Sir_Humphrey

No we were angry they did nothing to “investigate” the reality and presented information opposite of the truth. “Investigative journalism is a form of journalism in which reporters deeply investigate a single topic of interest, such as serious crimes, political corruption...” Apparently Tucker and Fox do not have any “journalists” at their disposal. They need people to email them information to their NY/DC studio.

“Mr. Jekielek: Well, it’s fascinating, also, when you’re a media and this happens because people can just go to the website and see what’s there. That’s what’s really interesting to me.

Mrs. Attkisson: They don’t want the facts, and I talk about this in the book as well. When you understand that the narrative is the goal, not honest reporting—you have to get out of the mindset that these places still, by and large, are trying to do honest reporting. They’re working with a different goal in mind: to advance a narrative. So they succeed.

They don’t want the other information that you want to provide them. It doesn’t matter what you show them and tell them. They’re going to stay on that narrative. I have ignored many false things that have been said about me over time because it almost drives that further.

The people who are driving the false narrative take what you say, as you prove that it’s untrue, and they’re able to spin and turn that up into a ball and make it all sound like that’s also part of the narrative. It almost feeds it. That’s the natural thing, what most people do, and the false narrative becomes bigger and bigger and more pervasive, and more people find out about it, and it’s almost counterproductive sometimes.”


87 posted on 11/24/2020 7:35:03 AM PST by PK1991 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson