Posted on 11/21/2020 1:06:20 PM PST by lowbridge
The tallies regurgitated by machines and reported: how do those match up? How do we know paper ballots have not nmbeen shredded en masse?
Guess you missed that moment in time when NR sped right past “stupid” and went full obtuse.
National review? Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
“ against trump “. Their signature issue back in 2016 many have recanted their point of view on that , including Victor Davis Hanson
No they were not and you cannot prove they were.
Bingo. Well stated. This is the position of many Freepers.
What a lie - GA counted the very same ballots used in the first count, without determining if all of them were legal and valid votes. OF COURSE they got the same results, nothing else was expected - and the corrupt GA Governor and Sec of State WANTED that result. I wonder how much THEIR families got from the Chinese? They seem to be just like the Biden crime family, literally selling out their country for money to the Red Chinese MFers who have murdered over 200,000 people here since March.
Amen!
Now then, if the Dominion machines are on the up and up I am sure that they wouldn't mind if my computer staff played with one for a week or so? Don't need much just the machine and operators manual. We can reverse engineer the code to see what it really does. Of course, if Dominion would like to provide the code that would be helpful. And maybe include the programmer's name just in case we have any questions. But I am sure that the DOJ already performing this investigation!
“The tallies regurgitated by machines and reported: how do those match up? How do we know paper ballots have not nmbeen shredded en masse?”
Because the recount was by hand and with observers.
THE RECOUNT BY HAND MATCHED THE INITIAL MACHINE RESULT.
This doesn’t address quality of ballots or envelopes. It strictly and only tests the machines and the machines do indeed pass that test.
Software yelling and flailing arms is a fail. The software was not the reason in Georgia for this result. The SoS allowing no signature verify was the problem.
An audit of that will generate potentially enough 1000s of problems to get the legislature to appoint Trump electors, but the machines and software, not a problem in Georgia. That is barking up the wrong tree.
RE: FRAUDULENT BALLOTS:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3903666/posts?page=71#71
Atlanta metro counties showed a 2 to 5% better Biden rate than 2016. (doubtful but feasible)
But one county (Fulton/Atlanta) reported a 40% increase. 40 % ! ....about 100K more votes than previous years in Fulton alone.
Stacy Abrams, coincidentally oversees D efforts in Fulton Co. Well, I’ll be gawd damn !
Please, someone explain how a bunch of fraudulent ballots inputed into the count would not match a recount. Yes, meaningless.
The in-person voting in Ga. with the new machines seems solid. Here’s how we vote in person.
1) Present your ID and the clerk finds you on the precinct registered voter list and hands you an activation card for the voting machine.
2) Make your selections on the touch screen voting machine, then review and confirm the selections on the summary page. Press submit and a paper “receipt” is printed out.
3) The voter brings that “receipt” and places it in a scanner that confirms the printed ballot matches and then stores the ballot both via an electronic image and the paper “receipt” is stored in case of the need for a recount.
The fraud in Ga. occurred in the unverified mail-in ballots (.25% rejection rate), and the Stacey Abrahms ballot curing and harvesting service capitulated to by our weak-kneed Secretary of State in a consent decree outside of the legislatures law.
All the more damning is that Kemp was the Georgia Secretary of State (IIRC 2018) and had to be fully versed in election law, procedures, and security.
Corrupt POS.
So lets say you need the voting machines to tell you exactly which votes have come in. The machines have registered voters. You need to know who has not voted. You wait until 3AM stop putting ballots in the computers but you tell everyone you have lots more left and you will start counting in the morning. That gives you enough time to make up the new ballots with the right names. Its why there are so many dead people and people who have moved. They needed to get all these ballots in the computers. But they would not have proper signatures. They may not have been folded. They may not have even had an outer envelope. In fact they may have been computer generated. Or they may have been hundreds with the exact same marks. But they needed to get the voting information out of these machines so they no what registered voters to add at 4AM. Then they needed to keep the poll watchers away so they could not see the fake ballots.
They did not switch votes. They added votes to non voting registered voters.
Think that one could eliminate the so called “pristine” mail in ballots with only 1 vote (Biden) in the thousands. Pristine as in ... 1).there are NO FOLDS or creases in the paper 2.) the comparison to ballots that were mailed in in envelopes that are a certain size, requiring printer made folds to fit the envelope... and 3.) the envelope in which they arrived as has been said— should be saved, for a FULL count- one ballot one return envelope (the voted ballot once removed from the envelope becomes— anonymous. the number of envelopes should match the number of so called mailed in ballots. The envelopes don’t have to be paired up with a voted ballot— just be the same number.
wrong....
Dominion has more than one type of machine. I don’t know what they used in GA or certain places in GA but some machines PRINT ballots after “voters” fill in their choices on a touch screen.
What if 200,000 ballots got printed in the wee hours of the morning when everyone but some dems had been sent home?
And John McCormack is on it,
Gonna make sure National Spew gets buried,
Johnny-boi is whistling, past the Kraken.
sung to the tune of "He's Making A List"
i remember National Review. Had a subscription about 15-20y ago.
Again with the “no evidence” false MEME from.... MEDIA!
As far as the calculation ratio claim-— this is provable by forensics. Which will be forth coming.
The algorithm is definitely identifiable by experts. JUST like the algorithm created by MIT wags for the subprime mortgage cascade.... can be proven, and... WAS!
National Review is not good at real world math and algorithms.They also are nothing like the mag that was Buckley’s.
Bingo. Well stated. This is the position of many Freepers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.