Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Supreme Court Order that has media and Biden upset. Trump leads in PA with all legal votes!
General Dispatch ^ | 11/07/2020

Posted on 11/07/2020 10:48:55 AM PST by SeekAndFind



Unreal. The Supreme Court had to issue two orders to PA. I suspect this is going to a re-vote. Seriously. And it had better be an in-person vote. https://t.co/S0jeE1hS3I— Ned Ryun (@nedryun) November 7, 2020

Thread/ I joined @FoxNews @IngrahamAngle to discuss the #SupremeCourt and #2020PresidentialElection. The Supreme Court says the #Democrats cannot count ballots in secret any longer. Please watch and share! pic.twitter.com/u5a472woc5— Harmeet K. Dhillon (@pnjaban) November 7, 2020



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: media; pennsylvania; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 next last
To: workerbee

The dems probably anticipated this and have them all comingled and back dated with no way to tell which is which.


101 posted on 11/07/2020 12:21:35 PM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Don’t tell me that crap about “the only thing the Supreme Court can do”. Haven’t you seen them do all kinds of crap that violates the Constitution already?


102 posted on 11/07/2020 12:22:31 PM PST by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

Fews - I am under the impression that it did happen, was caught on Election night, and was corrected. It was nothing more than a transposed number being reported. Can you elaborate on “That didn’t happen” because I hate to be snookered by anything fake, no matter who does it.


103 posted on 11/07/2020 12:22:57 PM PST by Greenpees (Coulda Shoulda Woulda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

What did happen?


104 posted on 11/07/2020 12:23:35 PM PST by DoughtyOne (If you're neverTrump at this point, drop the charade, you're just never the United States.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: kevao

Alito gave them until 2:00pm today to respond. So we will see.
—-
They responded. They declared Biden the winner. This move is their last hope to avoid the truth coming out and to demoralize the GOP.

Mitt Romney says, “I like it!”


105 posted on 11/07/2020 12:24:19 PM PST by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So the lying mainly-slime media are lawless as well?

Not that I'm surprised at all at this...
106 posted on 11/07/2020 12:27:53 PM PST by Subcutaneous Fishstick Blues
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greenpees

The parent post said “ 138,000 votes found thing”

That is what I said “didn’t happen”, there was no 138K found votes

You are correct, there was a typo (a 0 at the end of a number) in unofficial numbers that were sent from Antrim county to the state officials. It was caught within half an hour by election officials.


107 posted on 11/07/2020 12:28:10 PM PST by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There is no process for a revote. It will go to the state assembly to decide.


108 posted on 11/07/2020 12:28:20 PM PST by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honest Nigerian

Do you wish the Supreme Court to violate the Constitution? Why do you think the president has insisted on originalists for his Court nominations?


109 posted on 11/07/2020 12:29:42 PM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill & Publius available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: zaxtres

RE: The demoncraps of Pennsylvania just said a big eff you to Alito with the calling of the state for Biden. He is not going to like that one bit

And what can Alito do about it?
How many military divisions does he have?


110 posted on 11/07/2020 12:31:06 PM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

“What did happen?”

There was a typo in unofficial preliminary numbers sent from Antrim county to state officials. It was corrected within half an hour by election officials but not before some website had added the number to one of their graphs showing a “spike” That website later tweeted out an explanation of what happened.

There was no 138K “found” votes”


111 posted on 11/07/2020 12:32:11 PM PST by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Publius

If federal law requires that federal elections have to be held on the SAME DAY, how is it legal for various states to allow early voting before the SAME DAY, and late voting after the SAME DAY? Seems that the remedy would be to exclude all votes not literally cast on November 3, 2020.


112 posted on 11/07/2020 12:40:03 PM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Can the SC or Alito just order the PA legislature to award the electors to Trump because there were violations of constitutional law?


113 posted on 11/07/2020 12:40:20 PM PST by TheGreatFazool (The Great Fazool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

I agree. I believe all VBM and ealy voting to be a violation of the 1840s federal election law. I believe that law mandates that all voters appear in person on one day to vote.


114 posted on 11/07/2020 12:42:45 PM PST by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill & Publius available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
The judges can order a strict interpretation of state law, and order only ballots received by 8pm to be counted.

If, contrary to a direct order from a sitting Supreme Court Justice, the crapweasels in Philadelphia "mixed" the ballots, the Court could reasonably say "Whatever the count was at 8PM on election night is the final count" and Trump gets all the state's electors.

The Supreme Court CANNOT modify election law, but it can dissuade f*ckery.

115 posted on 11/07/2020 12:43:40 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

VOTE STUFFING

Pattern in swing states w/ Senate races.

Michigan

Trump: 2,637,173
GOP Sen: 2,630,042
Dif: 7,131

Biden: 2,787,544
Dem Sen: 2,718,451
Dif: 69,093

When you account for 3rd party vote, seems like tens of thousands of mysterious Biden votes w/ no down ticket votes. pic.twitter.com/gE5mcCVz7w— US Rebel (@USRebellion1776) November 5, 2020

Meanwhile, over in Michigan...

TOTAL MICHIGAN HOUSE RACE VOTES:

5,416,122

TOTAL PRESIDENTIAL VOTES:

5,531,370— Real American Politics (@RealAPolitics) November 5, 2020

Wanna keep going, troll-boi?


116 posted on 11/07/2020 12:47:48 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I don’t think they could do that, either. The count at 8pm on election day wouldn’t reflect ballots that had been received by that point.

Either way, somebody is going to get screwed here.

There is no equal protection under the law if a single state decides election day can be extended for three days - and accept unverifiable garbage as ballots (no postmarks).

If they didn’t segregate the ballots, there’s no recourse that I can see. The PA Supreme Court is criminal for what they’ve done.


117 posted on 11/07/2020 12:50:12 PM PST by Greenpees (Coulda Shoulda Woulda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I did some number crunching, going back to pres elections to 1996, hoping to understand the impact of party line voting in senate races when there is a POTUS election.

i.e the effect of coattails

I found that in 1996 and 2000, the average differential between senate races and potus races in all 50 states, was less than 7%. in more recent elections....around 5%.

I did not do HOR races, as there is too much data. I made an assumption that the % would be roughly the same.

in other words, people are less inclined to split their vote across party lines since 2004 than they were going back to 1996

I still have to calculate the confidence intervals, but if there is more than a 5% differential in these states between potus votes and senate votes, across party lines, then there is some serious fraud going on. no way that percentage would change magically in 2020


118 posted on 11/07/2020 12:53:36 PM PST by QualityMan ( Mr. President, we have your back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Publius

There is plenty of “plain language “provisions in the constitution

The courts have often ruled in contravention thereof

I can cite plenty of examples if you want. But if you have knowledge of the constitution and Supreme Court decision send you know what I’m talking about

An Election which is smothered in fraud is a violation of equal protection and due process

So you decide what’s more important. A fixed date or fundamental fairness


119 posted on 11/07/2020 12:59:37 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat ( TAG PedoJoe w/ DEFUND the POLICE OPEN BORDERS CORRUPTION DUNKIN/7-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange
Hi Troll-boi.

There are four or five instances people keep tripping over and confusing with each other. In different states.

The 138399 or whatever, was when one county in Wisconsin of around 15,000 people, added a '0' at the end of their vote count; so the 150,000 - 15,000 = 135,000.

I'm too lazy to surf back through my hundreds of posts across multiple sites to find the name and exact count, and the county name. But that is the one you were talking about.

But there are others.

In VA, they unilaterally added 300,000 votes to Biden "by mistake" and had to walk it back to 100,000.

In Wisconsin, they really did have a dump of 169,000 mail-in ballots by the ballot fairy. Here's the Tweet, note the timestamp.

Milwaukee’s 169,000+ absentee ballots en route to county election officials pic.twitter.com/kXTiAJ8Xsp— Matt Smith (@mattsmith_news) November 4, 2020

As far as thousands of votes with one candidate's name, there are multiple examples all over. This is just one:

This is from Nov 5. so I didn't just rumor-mill it for this post.

VOTE STUFFING

Pattern in swing states w/ Senate races.

Michigan

Trump: 2,637,173

GOP Sen: 2,630,042

Dif: 7,131

Biden: 2,787,544

Dem Sen: 2,718,451

Dif: 69,093

When you account for 3rd party vote, seems like tens of thousands of mysterious Biden votes w/ no down ticket votes. pic.twitter.com/gE5mcCVz7w— US Rebel (@USRebellion1776) November 5, 2020

Meanwhile, over in Michigan...

TOTAL MICHIGAN HOUSE RACE VOTES:

5,416,122

TOTAL PRESIDENTIAL VOTES:

5,531,370— Real American Politics (@RealAPolitics) November 5, 2020

can someone check what the percentages were in Wisconsin?

can somebody TRACK the percentages over time as the "Vote Fairy" keeps delivering new votes?

For ALL the fraud states, please?

Source:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3902138/posts?page=444#444

120 posted on 11/07/2020 1:08:49 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson