Wiki explanation of the Law which was apparently edited on November 5th...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benford%27s_law
Dems won’t follow the science
Duh.
I think this will all end in the Supreme Court. The SC will take a stand against vote fraud - as it undermines the Republic. Their opinion will be one for the ages. It will go down with Marburg v Madison, Brown v Board of Education.
The Supreme Court is needed to restore America’s faith in the voting system. It should be a 9-0 decision, but I have faith that there are at least 5 who will stand with America.
Had to think about this before realizing why. Its usually more likely to have a few than to have many. Including a few 10s or a few 100s etc.
Has there been any comparison of the number of ballots that were only filled out for Biden vs. ballots only filled out for Trump? I think what you will find is the Biden-only ballots greatly exceed the Trump-only ballots because the Democrats were in a hurry to cheat and they filled out an extreme number of Biden-only ballots.
I pray our side gets a day in court soon and has tons of evidence and data like this to make the cheating crystal clear for all to see.
What I want to know is has there ever been a POTUS election where so many states came within a 10th of a point apart? This is really suspicious like they made just enough fake ballots to put Biden in the lead. Take Georgia for example 49.4 to 49.3 or PA, Biden 4/10th of a point above Trump. Trump was ahead in those states especially PA where he was almost TEN points above Biden with 86% of precincts reporting in, and in a day Biden takes the lead? What??
As a very general comment — One of my problems with our legal system is that our lawyers and judges are all about technicalities. Hey, you need an air-tight case in which you absolutely prove that something happened. Maybe Joe’s numbers increase EXACTLY 99998888 in every single contested state. Maybe that seems very odd. Maybe that seems to violate Benford’s Law. So what? You haven’t PROVED anything!
For me, I want justice. I know fraud when I see it. Biden committed fraud. Benford’s Law seems good and useful and convincing to me (in addition to so much else). I have a real problem with legal minds who see the injustice staring them in the face and who will just shrug and say, yeah, but where’s the proof??
H*MMER AND SC*RECARD news is being disappeared rapidly from Facebook, Twitter and Youtube. Watch this while you can.
Sidney Powell, Tom Fitton, Lou Dobbs discuss H*mmer & Sc*recard
November 6, 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fVDB8_JWL0c&feature=emb_logo&ab_channel=TedPikul
This is both awesome and legit. Of course, if it ever makes it into the lamestream media, it will be called “an obscure and discredited game theory that was used as a party trick, before computers were invented, to guess people’s birthdays. Also used by carnival barkers and street magicians to guess a person’s weight.”
My thought is....if you dropped your mail in vote at a drop site, it did NOT have a post office date stamp. Which means you can introduce or separate (destroy) votes any way you please.
The following may be something to watch for as the2020 presidential election vote count mysteriously slows down... (ie, some of the telltale benford fraud fingerprints might be deliberately erased by fraudsters fine tuning their fraud to remove the benford fraud fingerprints):
Amid allegations of electoral fraud in the 2016 Russian elections, an article co-written by Kirill Kalinin and Mebane in The Washington Post observed that the mean of the second digit of the number of voters in each of the country’s 96,869 electoral precincts, to four significant figures, was equal to the expected mean (4.187) per Benford’s law. In addition, the mean of the last digit of the votes in each precinct for the triumphant party, United Russia, was equal to the expected mean (4.5) per Benford’s law. On the basis of other indicators of electoral fraud, Kalinin and Mebane suggest that these “perfect” statistics show that those responsible had deliberately rigged the votes to conform to the expectations of Benford’s law.[42]
Benford’s law works for sets of numbers that grow naturally by exponential rates. For example you had 500 dollars and it was in an account earning 25 percent growth every year , your account would have this amount of money each year
500
625
781
977
1221
1526
1907
2384
2980
3725
4657
5821
7276
9095
11369
14211
17764
22204
27756
34694
43368
54210
67763
84703
105879
132349
165436
206795
258494
323117
403897
504871
631089
Notice the numeral “1” appears most of the the time as the leading number, in this case 27 percent , the other numbers as 2-9 show up less as the first digit. This because our number system base 10. If we were to use the most simple number base 2 , with just ones and zeroes, the data would not favor either case , but base 10, favors the first number for when data grows exponentially...
Another example take 120 and if it grows by 25 percent, it takes many iterations before it gets above 200, compare to at 900 with a 25 percent growth , the first iteration the new number is not going to be a 9 anymore , therefore very few 9s and lots of 1s will show up in data that has a compounding growth factor.
Population counts follow Benford’s law, because they grow exponentially , the amount of forestation or any thing that can be measured with a growth rate, using a base 10 number system to record , the numeral 1 will appear more often in the data set.
So what does this have to do with votes ? Votes, are a measure of popularity , like top songs or ideas ,, a few people like , then they tell others, and they tell others , so popularity grows exponentially, and might be that a collected data sets of votes from a region of population ,it seems plausible to follow Benford, but experts say the law might not be reliable always to detect fraud in elections..Benford’s law does not work on all data sets ..
However ... note the 6 key is in the middle of the keyboard , easy to quickly make up and type in.... fits the pattern of accounting fraud according to benfords law, so why are most of the Biden’s counts coming up numerals 4 5 and 6. While a natural distribution we should see more 1s and 2s than 4s 5s or 6s, like Trumps counts show?
Check out this guys analysis of several places where Trump numbers adheres to Benford , Biden does not ..
https://github.com/cjph8914/2020_benfords
Very odd indeed, but don’t expect low information voters will be able to follow the logic
Facebook would NOT allow me to post this. Hmmm. Since they’re trying to protect Biden, this must be 100% correct.
Facebook also wont let me post about Jill Biden’s ex-husband’s book, which says the Bidens lie about how they met. Says they had an affair while they were married to first spouses.