Posted on 11/04/2020 6:04:10 PM PST by dpetty121263
The Supreme Court ordered Pennsylvania Democrats to respond by Thursday evening in a case challenging the state’s three-day extension for counting mail-in ballots.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
“You think ACB will side with the traitors?”
Probably not, but I wouldn’t be surprised. It would be her statement that she isn’t in Trump’s pocket — make her seem more “legitimate” and fair.
so this is just a response to the motion to intervene.
iow
the USSC is asking if they object if Trump/representative plaintiff intervenes.
What about North Carolina? Allowing ballots to come in up until November 12th? Nine days after the election? This is unheard of! What in the world is going on here?
it depends on the reality bubble around the judge. (for example roberts)
PA told SCOTUS no, that they will continue counting.
Actually, they do. But why should that matter? All they have to do is be blackmailed, or incentivized with buccho mega millions of dollars. So, seriously, what does it matter?
And add to that what James OKeefe and Project Veritas just posted about faudulent postmarking of those same late Nov 4th ballots
I hope that is correct
“Could get ALL hand-stamped ballots thrown out in contested states, since USPS is federal.”
Assuming the envelopes still exist. Then, how to connect a ballot to its corresponding envelope.
Need to hold re-elections in the cheating states with U.S. Marshalls running the show in every state.
So the PA AG won’t respond to SCOTUS???
Praying with you Norski.
What??? They told them no???
“...So the PA AG won’t respond to SCOTUS???...”
He’s a Soros bought and paid for meat puppet named Josh Shapiro.
A typical democrat piece of sh*t. He may or may or not respond. And if he doesn’t respond, I’d say Trump should send federal marshals to drag his ass out of his home at 3am Roger Stone style.
I saw several items listed when I search ‘election’ in the docket search, so I could have picked the wrong item.
I never heard the term “reality bubble”. What is it, and what is the context in SCOTUS?
Seems like the only solution.
Anyone seen the DOJ? Do we even have a DOJ anymore?
Yes indeed, because the AG and the soros SOS independent of the PA Legislature (who has demanded the SOS resign, BTW, today by the leaders of both houses PA Legislature)— decided to MIX together the ballots received up to Nov 3, and those now arriving.
Thus, the perfectly legal option (equal treatment under the law to other states who have not followed any such scheme)—is to throw out ALL the mixed ballots that cannot be distinguished (and not allow them to provide some “secret” identifiers/markers to re-sort. Just invalidate all of them).
The election count then remains as per the PA Legislature’s voting Statutes-— as it should have been, and the PA supreme courts unconstitutional (federally) changing of election law is vacated— cancelled. The count remains as all the votes to Nov. 3rd and other original PA Statutes as they should be followed.
The PA AG is a cocky bastard, bragging about he’s 6-0 with the courts....about to lose the only one that counts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.