Skip to comments.
Scientific American backs Biden in its 1st presidential endorsement
Yoohoo! "News" ^
| 9/15/2020
| Dylan Stableford
Posted on 09/15/2020 12:44:50 PM PDT by Menehune56
Scientific American on Tuesday endorsed Joe Biden, the first presidential endorsement in the magazines 175-year history. Its editors said they felt compelled to do so because President Trumps well-documented rejection of science, from climate change to the coronavirus, has cost tens of thousands of American lives.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: biden; tds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: Menehune56
21
posted on
09/15/2020 12:53:09 PM PDT
by
2banana
(Common ground with islamic terrorists-they want to die for allah and we want to arrange the meeting)
To: tet68
Yep. Political science, indeed.
I feel compelled to disregard their BS endorsement criteria.
22
posted on
09/15/2020 12:53:32 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
To: Joe Brower
Same. I used to be a subscriber... They took a hard turn Left and kept on going...
23
posted on
09/15/2020 12:53:41 PM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(A Psalm in napalm...)
To: Menehune56
My Dad used to subscribe.
Lots, and lots of former subscribers here.
24
posted on
09/15/2020 12:56:56 PM PDT
by
cba123
( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam)
To: Menehune56
Its editors said they felt compelled to do so because President Trumps well-documented rejection of science, from climate change to the coronavirus, has cost tens of thousands of American lives.
This Yahoo cuck uses quotes for compelled, so the rest of the sentence is biased trash from his own feeble mind.
25
posted on
09/15/2020 12:59:12 PM PDT
by
Rastus
To: Joe Brower
SciAm veered off into the weeds of leftist groupthink decades ago. I havent read it in 25 years. I had some material published in SciAm in the early '90s before it went down the drain. More recently, Sky & Telescope endorsed Black Lives Matter. It recently got rescued from oblivion by being acquired by the American Astronomical Society. All of physics seems to be going nuts.
To: Menehune56
I can remember when Scientific American was actually about science.
27
posted on
09/15/2020 1:04:06 PM PDT
by
beethovenfan
(Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
To: EagleUSA
There are several, well publicized instances where data for both Climate Change and Covid-19 have been manipulated, altered, or lost. Certain forms of inquiry, and outright skepticism of the ideas behind Climate Change and Covid have been deemed
forbidden by the likes of people at
Scientific American.
Rejection of science? Seems like that is exactly what SA is doing.
28
posted on
09/15/2020 1:05:27 PM PDT
by
fhayek
To: Menehune56
Scientific American is not being very scientific. I would say money is involved. Global warming is THEORY which is:
an idea or set of ideas that is intended to explain facts or events. : an idea that is suggested or presented as possibly true but that is NOT KNOWN OR PROVEN TO BE TRUE.
A theory has to be proven to be scientific law.
Global warming is just a set of ideas used to advance an agenda.
IT IS NOT PROVEN FACT.
A scientist at OSU had a set of data suggesting global warming is NOT substantiated by the data he collected.
He was fired and silenced.
This UNPROVEN THEORY is also being used to control everyone!
The data that global warmers have used doctored data! This has been silenced also.
The demon-rats pushing this could not even explain where carbon dioxide comes from when questioned l!
LOL!
To: Stepan12
From a wiki, if that's legal:
In 1986, it was sold to the Holtzbrinck group of Germany, which has owned it since. In the fall of 2008, Scientific American was put under the control of Nature Publishing Group, a division of Holtzbrinck.https://www.holtzbrinck.coa m/about/
30
posted on
09/15/2020 1:06:00 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Assault
(Die-ggl,TWT,FCBK,NYT,WPo,Hwd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antf,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA,ARP,MSNBC)
To: Menehune56
The Editor-In-Chief clearly wants a job in the President LegsUpHigh Administration.
31
posted on
09/15/2020 1:06:42 PM PDT
by
Gay State Conservative
(Thanks To Biden Voters Oregon Is Now A Battleground State!)
To: Menehune56
It has been decades since SA has been about real science, just like it has been decades since National Geographic has been about exploration and not politics.
32
posted on
09/15/2020 1:07:45 PM PDT
by
Governor Dinwiddie
(Guide me, O thou great redeemer, pilgrim through this barren land.)
To: cba123
“Lots, and lots of former subscribers here.”
Same here. It is entirely different now, very PC.
To: Joe Brower
I remember Sci American as a kid. My Uncle Art turned me on to the regular Martin Gardner column.
When I was older, I bought and read Sci American regularly. I enjoyed most the physics, astronomy (later, cosmology) and some of the chemistry stuff.
The publication changed. You and I quit at about the same time, 25 years ago. I don;t miss it personally, but I think I miss having a reliable publication around that I am willing to share with younger generations.
34
posted on
09/15/2020 1:11:44 PM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: Jane Long
A shame to see what liberalism has done to this country.
Imagine if they were as successful as they want to be.
Scientific American endorses Lysenko...
35
posted on
09/15/2020 1:12:13 PM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: Menehune56
Neither “Scientific” or “American”
36
posted on
09/15/2020 1:12:50 PM PDT
by
HarleyD
To: tet68
That’s exactly right.
I wish folks would tweet/post that reply, all over social media!!
37
posted on
09/15/2020 1:14:44 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
To: Joe Brower
--yep--left it behind in the late years of Lyndon Johnson--and Nat Geo about the same time-
-occasionally used to flip through in the dentist's office but they don't even have magazines anymore--
38
posted on
09/15/2020 1:14:53 PM PDT
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the meda or government says about firearms or explosives--)
To: HarleyD
👍🏼
39
posted on
09/15/2020 1:14:59 PM PDT
by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
To: 2banana
get woked...go broke
Have to wonder how many of Biden’s woke voters actually pay for a subscription to SA...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson