Roberts strikes again.
We need a team of investigators to ferret out Supreme Court blackmail.
RE: Supreme Court, in 5-4 Ruling, Strikes Down Restrictive Louisiana Abortion Law
When I saw the headline, without reading the content, I already said to myself — JOHN ROBERTS !!!
Looks like Roberts has gone full Souter and we will need another real conservative on the bench to offset him
Roberts just bats a thousand for his globalist buddies.
Roberts is being blackmailed.
It’s a theory that may have some validity.
OMFG, Roberts............
Roberts is being blackmailed because he illegally and feloniously adopted two children from Ireland which does not allow non citizens to adopt their children. The New York Times discovered this, said it, then never mentioned it again so they could blackmail him
Look it up.
Just figure roberts is always going to side with leftits on major cultural issues.
My post was removed from Breaking (perhaps because it didn’t have an MSM article attached; although I linked to the actual decision in the OP which I think would be better), so I added the Breaking category to this one. Apologies to the admin if the issue is more that the subject doesn’t qualify as Breaking News, but I think this is a big issue for most conservatives.
Souteroberts.. again.
It’s gotten to the point where it’s best for conservatives to not appeal things to the Supreme Court until there is a solid conservative majority.
Getting a ruling from the Supreme pretty much casts in concrete whereas if you stop at a lower court even if you lose you have a chance to overturn it when you get a truly conservative Supreme Court.
Roberts has been a complete and utter bust.
Acc. to Roberts, stare decisis is more important than States’ Rights.
As disappointing as this is, it may actually be a good thing. Had this passed, it would have militarized the feminists who have deep tentacles even inside the Republican Party. They would have mobilized to elect Biden over Trump.
Now, we can wait for Ginsburg to croak (she can’t last another four years, can she?) and have Trump nominate a pro-lifer that will give the conservatives a 5-4 majority (even without Roberts) when the case comes up again. Of course, it doesn’t mean someone like Gorsuch or Kavanaugh won’t switch sides the next time but if it comes out during Trump’s second term, there won’t be a way to fight back.
Roberts at his confirmation hearing in 2005, “Judges are like umpires. Umpires don’t make the rules; they apply them.” Time and time again, Roberts has demonstrated that is not an umpire(or at least a good one) but a pitcher or batter in the game. Is goal is not to be the impartial arbiter but to affect social outcomes, no different than the batter or the pitcher. Senate should draft impeachment proceedings just to put him on notice. They won’t impeach but it would be a severe rebuke nonetheless.
The 5-4 decision in which Chief Justice John Roberts joined with the courts liberal justices...
Here we go again.
Who are the SCOTUS Judges appointed by Republican Presidents that have been the greatest turncoats?
I know of two that are in the running-—
David Souter, appointed by George Herbert Walker Bush
John Roberts, appointed by George Walker Bush
Any others?
On the other side of the aisle, Who are the SCOTUS Judges appointed by Democrat Presidents that have been turncoats?