Supremes order U.S. city to explain its confiscation of legal guns

wnd.com ^ | 4/26/2020 | WND

[rktman]

he U.S. Supreme Court has ordered officials in San Jose, California, to explain why they confiscated the legally owned guns of Lori Rodriguez.

They still have them.

The case was brought by the Second Amendment Foundation on behalf of the woman.

The Supreme Court justices have instructed city officials to respond by May 20.

"We’re encouraged by this development in the case," said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. "If the city thought they could just ignore this case and make it go away, they’re wrong."

"Her firearms were seized seven years ago after her husband was taken to a hospital on a mental health issue," the foundation said. "At the time, a San Jose police officer advised Rodriguez he had authority to seize all firearms in the residence, including those belonging solely to her, which were all locked in a California-approved safe. The guns were taken without a warrant, and over Rodriguez's objection."

[marktwain]

I did not disagree with you.

I only supplied a link to the Supreme Court web site which showed the request.

[MarkL]

I miss Neal Knox and his leadership in the NRA.

Another great group that leftist Jews HATE is JPFO: “Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership.”

Mark

[marktwain]

The Counsel of Record on the Petition is Donald E.J. Kilmer, Jr.

He probabably wrote a good deal of it. Most cases of this magnitude are a team effort. I suspect Don Kilmer did the final edit. It would not surprise me if a number of attorneys contributed.

[marktwain]

Because half of the SCROTUS are tinpot dictators.

I put it this way:

Because the judicial philosophy of half the Supreme Court justices worships dictatorship by expert as the logical, rational, best way to govern.

Those Justices are: Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg , Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and half of Chief Justice John Roberts.

[entropy12]