Posted on 04/03/2020 7:53:37 AM PDT by vespa300
COVID Community Vulnerability Map Identification of the populations at risk for severe outcomes once infected to inform resource planning, interventions, outreach and other community initiatives
(Excerpt) Read more at covid19.jvion.com ...
Thanks, but no thanks.
Thanks, vespa
My house is on a dividing line.
My side of the street is ranked “very low”
The neighbors across from me are 2 levels more at risk, “high”.
I assume I’ll need to stay at least 6 feet away from the centerline of my street?
I think I’ll keep that to myself whilst casting a suspicious eye on them doing yard work.
Should I make them shout, “Unclean!” while they are outside?
Well, the worst counties in America are all rated “very low risk.” Sooo...so much for that.
More bullshit modeling based on secret criteria.
Should take the media about 45 minutes to misapply it.
Thanks for the linkie-dinkie!
I live on acreage outside of town — My house and most of the property have a risk level of ‘LOW’ — the back driveway, however is listed as ‘MEDIUM’
I guess I know which driveway to use!
I cant imagine what factors they used for this. Our distant suburban/country area, where everyone is on 2 acres or more, is indicated as “high risk.”
The part of the nearby city where the Soros organizations were placing in rented apartments the government sponsored refugees from places like Camaroon, Burma or Somalia, are ranked as low risk.”
I see the same thing. We are in lowest risk category, but just down the road, it jumps all the way to highest risk category. There are no big changes in the neighborhood, so that is just weird...and suspicious.
The map does not correlate well with actual case data.
Likely because it’s implied theme of “socioeconomic factors” does not match actual outcomes. That is probably because it assumes behaviors determined solely by such factors and not by human character, morals and values regardless of socioeconomic factors.
Well, its consistent for us. WHere it jumps is where not only have we had cases, but where sadly, a man died. I think it’s based on real data.
How ridiculous. Kennedy Space Center is in the Extremely High area.
Garbage.
Pretty much based on census data - but I think they weighted everything kind of screwy.
My area's risk level is "Very Low."
The nearest "Very High" risk area is about two miles away ... and yet it has the exact same characteristics in the NYT data as my area.\
Makes me wonder how they even assign the risk levels. You can probably do a better job with much less effort by simply looking at population density and no other data.
I looked around my area and have determined the map is BS.
How was the analysis conducted?
Jvion analyzed de-identified data on 30 million Americans
Data analyzed includes de-identified claims, USDA, EPA, Transportation and other third-party data sources like food and retail access, length of job commute, and transportation
Patient modeling was performed using comparable respiratory viruses as a surrogate endpoint
Geolocation and points of interest data is provided by Microsoft services and supported on the Azure platform
Useless. They picked silly criteria.
How is this different from other available maps?
While most available maps focus on the spread of COVID or actual count of documented cases, Jvions Community Vulnerability Map identifies the populations that once infected will likely experience severe outcomes ranging from hospitalization to mortality
Jvions analysis also surfaces the socioeconomic barriers driving the risk for those communities
The map displays additional information including points of interest relevant to addressing the at-risk communities needs
I live on a county line. The folks 4 houses down or directly across the street are at high risk while we on the right side of the road are at median risk.
Looks like garbage factors. It identifies length of commute to work as a high-risk factor without considering how much of that is individual auto commuting as opposed to big city mass transit exposure during relatively short commutes. It also identifies income as a factor, assuming the wealthy can segregate themselves successfully apparently. It seems to be aimed at comforting big city dwellers and making flyover country and suburbs nervous. Their agenda is showing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.