Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN Analysis: Why didn't Elizabeth Warren do better?
CNN ^ | March 5, 2020 | by Chris Cillizza

Posted on 03/05/2020 11:09:33 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren dropped out of the 2020 presidential race Thursday, ending a once front-running bid that never achieved its sky-high potential once voting actually began.

Answering the "what happened" question is never a simple thing. Voters make up their minds for lots of different reasons -- some of which they are willing to articulate and some they simply won't. But generally speaking, there seem to be three reasons why Warren didn't get to where she wanted to go.

1) She peaked too soon: If the Iowa caucuses were October 3, Warren could have won going away. National polling around that time captures Warren's summer and early fall surge.

2) She tried to be more than just a liberal: Voters in the two lanes of the Democratic Party have now coalesced around Biden in the center and Sanders on the left.

3) Sexism: This is an indisputable fact: We have had 44 presidents and not one of them has been a woman. Coincidence? Probably not. How much did the fact that Warren is a woman and ran on an unapologetically feminist platform for president affect the outcome? It's almost impossible to know, but it's equally impossible to think it had no role in how voters perceived her.

Asked about the role her gender played in the race on Thursday, Warren responded this way:

"That is the trap question for every woman. If you say yeah, there was sexism in this race, everyone says, 'Whiner.' And if you say no, there was no sexism, about a bazillion women think, 'What planet do you live on?'"

She added that she would "have a lot more to say on that subject later on."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election2020; fakeindian; psychojawea; warren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last
To: Oldeconomybuyer

4) She sucks.


41 posted on 03/05/2020 11:24:49 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Because no one ever asked her to run.


42 posted on 03/05/2020 11:24:50 AM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I don’t know, maybe because she was as psychotic communist?


43 posted on 03/05/2020 11:25:28 AM PST by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
She peaked too soon ...

She speaked too soon ...

44 posted on 03/05/2020 11:25:31 AM PST by BlueLancer (Orchides Forum Trahite - Cordes Et Mentes Veniant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

“Sexism”

Wait, the last Democrat nominee was Her Thighness, Shrillary Clinton. Where was the sexism there? Has it mysteriously materialized in the past four years?


45 posted on 03/05/2020 11:25:33 AM PST by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Besides being a compulsive liar her biggest mistake was being a mean girl, it's unattractive. Tulsi Gabbard made the same mistake.


46 posted on 03/05/2020 11:25:52 AM PST by Aquamarine (Where we go one, we go all. ~ Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

By that logic, Obama should have stepped aside or waited 4 to 8 years. After all, 2008 was Hillary's turn. And, she could probably have easily defeated McCain.

When she did get another chance -- 8 years of waiting took its toll.

Princess Paleface-with-High-Cheekbones was her own worst enemy. It was lie after lie after lie after lie -- in screeching tones.
47 posted on 03/05/2020 11:26:10 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Why didn't Elizabeth Warren do better?

'Cause she ain't that good!

48 posted on 03/05/2020 11:26:16 AM PST by JimRed (TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

As I suspected the idiot who wrote this article hasn’t the slightest clue. Warren is shrill, arrogant and drips condescension. Her never ending stream of wildly expensive plans were simply stabs into the dark in desperation. Maybe 6 people would show up to her rallies.

She never stood the slightest chance because she is at heart completely unlikeable. Her attempts to seem down to earth were stiff and entirely phony.

So... Well.... Bye!


49 posted on 03/05/2020 11:26:20 AM PST by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Because being a preachy college professor who lies about her ethnicity for personal gain doesn’t inspire or excite.


50 posted on 03/05/2020 11:27:04 AM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Just take a look at her. She always looks like she just got out of bed and threw on clothes to go to the supermarket for bread.


51 posted on 03/05/2020 11:27:16 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LydiaLong

Yep. The biggest problem with the Warren campaign was that it was headed by Elizabeth Warren.


52 posted on 03/05/2020 11:27:18 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: vigilante2

Right-She’s a snarky, know-it-all, who doesn’t know squat.

I have met women like that... you lay down skid marks getting away from them


53 posted on 03/05/2020 11:27:29 AM PST by SMARTY ("Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us - by obligations, not by rights".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
3) Sexism: This is an indisputable fact:

Sexism? These were DEMOCRATIC primaries.

54 posted on 03/05/2020 11:29:25 AM PST by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I suspect she did not do better because she is a lying, unlikable harpy but that is just my guess.


55 posted on 03/05/2020 11:30:26 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

According to the Babylon Bee, she rode back in solitude to her reservation, having failed to take the land back from the pale faces...

“I am sorry, my people. I have failed,” she said somberly, a single tear rolling down her cheek. “The white man still holds our land, and the very trees cry out against them. May Great Spirit grant us another chance in 4 harvests.”


56 posted on 03/05/2020 11:30:52 AM PST by bigbob (Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vigilante2

Likability is huge. Bloomberg registered a negative number on the likability scale and he got crushed. Likability alone is not sufficient (Tulsi) but without it you cannot win. To me, Warren seems like a crazy assistant principal in charge of discipline, every boy’s worst nightmare.


57 posted on 03/05/2020 11:31:15 AM PST by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LydiaLong

“Maybe it was about her promising to appoint a transgender teen to her education committee.”

That was a big one. It demonstrated to even the thickest DEMbulb that there was no end to her pandering.


58 posted on 03/05/2020 11:32:16 AM PST by The Toll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Reminded most men of bad teacher they once had.


59 posted on 03/05/2020 11:32:28 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The fact that CNN does not know this answer is the reason their ratings are so low.


60 posted on 03/05/2020 11:33:36 AM PST by kempster (w President of all time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson