Posted on 01/23/2020 6:46:04 AM PST by rxsid
Significant change in Burisma timeline exonerates President Trump
Video: https://twitter.com/FollowQanon/status/1220139746271408128
I hope this spreads like wildfire and he has to spend the rest of his time on the campaign trail explaining this away!!!! No doubt he’ll do his goofy routine (which he can’t help) and hope the public doesn’t understand the timeline!
“The media has no interest.”
The media doesn’t matter nor does calling a witness to give Soloman’s finding. The senators will be aware of the finding even if it is not presented in the trial.
“Your question DOES make sense - otherwise Biden’s threat wouldn’t have made any sense. As near as I can find, he was there in March 2016 and that would be when he gloated about his threat that we’ve all seen on video - EXCEPT the poor dems have never seen it!!”
They were told it had been debunked, good enough for the Hussein Heads.
Not true.
The only "new information" they want is Schiff's witnesses in the Senate.
-PJ
Why if they have the supporting evidence, wouldn’t the republicans bring this up when it’s their turn? Wouldn’t this support victory?
From your link:
Fact: Ukraine law enforcement reopened the Burisma investigation in early 2019, well before President Trump mentioned the matter to Ukraine’s new president Vlodymyr Zelensky.
This may be the single biggest under-reported fact in the impeachment scandal: four months before Trump and Zelensky had their infamous phone call, Ukraine law enforcement officials officially reopened their investigation into Burisma and its founder.
The effort began independent of Trump or his lawyer Rudy Giuliani’s legal work. In fact, it was NABU – the very agency Joe Biden and the Obama administration helped start – that recommended in February 2019 to reopen the probe.
NABU director Artem Sytnyk made this announcement that he was recommending a new notice of suspicion be opened to launch the case against Burisma and its founder because of new evidence uncovered by detectives.
Ukrainian officials said that new evidence included records suggesting a possible money laundering scheme dating to 2010 and continuing until 2015.
A month later in March 2019, Deputy Prosecutor General Konstantin Kulyk officially filed this notice of suspicion re-opening the case.
And Reuters recently quoted Ukrainian officials as saying the ongoing probe was expanded to allegations of theft of public funds.
The implications of this timetable are significant to the Trump impeachment trial because the president couldn’t have pressured Ukraine to re-open the investigation in July 2019 when Kiev had already done so on its own, months earlier.
NABU prepares draft notice of suspicion on episode involving ex-minister Zlochevsky
By Interfax-Ukraine. Published Feb. 10, 2019.
That’s the reply I get from “Progressives’ whenever I bring up Crowdstrike. (Which leads me to believe there is something There, Too)
“.... blow this crap show wide open....”
This was the reason I, and a lot of people, wanted this to go through to trial (as did Trump). This is the best opportunity to “drain the swamp” that could be available. This is that big chance to spotlight the elite players that are in the front and pulling those on to the stage that are some of the tools the elite use as shadow figures semi in the open.
We all knew, those with any thought on this, that this had nothing to do with impeachment but being another attempt by the socialist/libs to hammer Trump and the conservatives for winning the election in 2016, reversing for success liberal policies, and appearing to going to win in 2020 due to that success and not just words making them the party of compliance. They are panicking at every turn and the old playbook is outdated. And I hope every one of them feels it and is exposed for it. They have been “TRUMPED!”
rwood
I've been saying for months that Joe Biden never had any interest in running for President until the spring of 2019. The short timeline in Post #1 overlooks a significant event: the Ukraine elections in March and April of 2019.
Here's my guess at what happened:
1. Joe Biden left office as VP in January 2017 and knew his political career was over. He had no interest in running for President in 2020 for any number of reasons.
2. The infamous video clip from 2018 of him bragging about getting the Ukrainian prosecutor fired a few years earlier is actually a big piece of evidence in support of what I've said here. There's no way in hell even someone as dumb as Biden would go out and openly brag about that kind of crooked conduct if he had any interest in running for President.
3. The Ukrainian election was held in two rounds in March and April 2019. The first round was a general election (March 31st), and the second round was a run-off between the top two candidates (April 21st), since none of the 30+ candidates got a majority of the vote in the first round.
4. Biden probably panicked after Zelensky was one of the finalists in the preliminary round, since it was clear he'd be the overwhelming favorite to win the election in April (Zelensky eventually won the run-off with 73% of the vote), and would be an anti-corruption crusader in office. So he quickly cobbled together a "campaign kickoff announcement" for a campaign kickoff rally that ended up getting delayed multiple times and was then orchestrated as a pathetic, half-assed speech with several hundred union members in Philadelphia.
Biden probably figured that running for President would shield him from any accountability for his actions -- by either the U.S. or Ukrainian governments.
See Post #30. There's a reason why Biden kicked off his campaign just FOUR DAYS after Zelensky was elected as president of Ukraine.
“”They were told it had been debunked””
Their favorite word - debunked....how many times have we heard them use it?
I am really confused - I don’t think Biden ever gave a reason WHY they wanted the Ukrainian investigator fired, did he? Has anyone ever said? If I missed it, forgive me as my old brain can only take in and retain so much!
Thank you so much. I can print it and read it and then mail it to people who don’t have computers....yes - there are such people...worse than myself. I did get as far as computers but I’ve drawn the line there - no techy gadgets for me...If my hands get crippled it will be from old age and not from CLINGING to a cell phone 24/7. I’m at the old age stage and so far so good!
Tweet from John Solomon, one of the hazing victims of the Eye Tappa Phone fraternity.
MSM to John Solomon, Trump, and the general public: “This story is debunked because we say it is, and keep your damned facts and timelines out of it! Obey!”
““I’ve always hoped that the defense in the Senate would be performed as an offensive action aimed at exposing and draining the swamp. But I think the current plan is to make it all go away.””
I respectfully disagree. The impeachment is a Dem offensive action. It should be shut down and disparaged. With that done, we can then open our own offense to drain the swamp, starting with the corruption of the Bidens, Pelosis and then the Clappers, Comeys et al. Doing this as part of the Democratic drama, impeachment, will muck things up.
“”There’s no way in hell even someone as dumb as Biden would go out and openly brag about that kind of crooked conduct if he had any interest in running for President. “”
That’s what hasn’t made sense. Your statement does as does the whole Solomon revelation now.
I have to ask myself why sensible people like ourselves waste so much time on a nonentity like Joe Biden but I think he invites our ridicule and rage! Those attending his rallies can’t see him for the blowhard he is and has always been?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.