Posted on 12/27/2019 5:42:49 PM PST by wildbill
How did the #Ancient Civilisations cut and shape such intricate stonework like we see in #Ancient Egypt? How were holes seemingly drilled through solid granite? How did the #Incas create walls with perfectly connecting blocks of stone? Did they use traditional tools? Did they harness the power of the sun as I explained in a previous video? Or did they know the secrets of sound and this was a form of ancient high technology?
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Like the spark plug found in a coal steam in Australia?
The identity of the geologist and the means of dating were never clarified, nor were the findings ever published in any known periodical.[1] Furthermore, at the time of the artifact’s reported discovery there was no method for dating the concretion.[4] There are examples of accretions surrounding iron or steel artifacts, some of them discussed by J. M. Cronyn. [5]
Stromberg accepted and also arranged for the artifact to be inspected by a geologist from the University of Washington Earth and Space Science department. The inspections confirmed the previous conclusion that the artifact was a 1920s-era Champion spark plug
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coso_artifact
Yeah, I agree.
Only the bottom courses of the Great Pyramid are granite. The rest is mostly limestone which is far, far easier to work by hand and cut relatively square with axes. More intriguing to me is the fact that the Egyptian people of that epoch supposedly only had copper tools. So how do you cut stone - even limestone, with soft copper tooling? Where are the tools used for that massive building project? The ramps, giant cranes and pulleys, River barges for shipping the blocks from the quarries at Aswan. Massive amounts of heavy equipment just vanished. That, to me is even more mysterious than the pyramids
The proof is in the pudding.
He kept talking how they could have done it with a tuning fork, even theorized what the parameters should be, but never got around to demonstrating one actually working.
The polymer concrete theory seems reasonable.
That was not what was said in the video.
"She insists, incidentally, that these were definitely not non-ferrous, but "steel"."
Like this?
Several years after this, they developed plasm cutters.
That was in the text but not what he said.
Nit picking troll nitpicks.
Nothing matches my sadness about the torch the Democrats are putting to the U.S. Constitution.
But did they consider the possibility that that 1920s-era Champion spark plug time-traveled back 70 million years and Oog threw it into a peat bog which became coal?
GOTCHA AGAIN!
You are a lousy troll!
AGAIN? LOL
I don't have anywhere near your experience. :)
If it was possible to cut stones using tuning forks, we should be able to do that today. We can cut things with sound by using powered ultrasonic cutters, but not using unpowered tuning forks.
Just as an aside, I found a 22 bullet in my sluice box one fine gold prospecting day with a perfect ring of sandstone formed around the lead / brass junction. The accretion was nearly the diameter of the bullet itself.
My thought was the galvanic action of the dissimilar metals in the acidic biological activity in the heavenly organic laced deposits caused a binding process for the streambed sand. The material was as hard and visually identical to sandstone.
This indicates that mineral deposits from cataclysmic flood events like rain soaked mud slides can cause far more rapid sand stone formations than current theoretical dating methods if the mineral deposits contain dissimilar metal deposits.
Just thought you might be interested...
Erasing all that knowledge from the past, its an amazing act of ignorance."
Didn't the final total destruction take place in the 7th century by the ROP?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.