Posted on 11/13/2019 6:11:24 AM PST by Pilgrim's Progress
An opportunity to watch the kangaroo democrats attempt to cover themselves from the coming firestorm of the IG report by wounding our sitting president. Watch this coup against our Commander-in-Chief.
Yes Taylor and Kent were both asked “What do you think (the speaker) was thinking when he said that ?” “Why did he say that ?” etc
asking for their OPINION for 2 hours...
How about some facts ???
Our president is now meeting with Turkey’s president in oval office. Press conference to follow “in a little while”
God bless President Trump.
Chris Wallace is surprised that Devin Nunes was so political. Ok.
As others have noted, this is all hearsay. And it’s all by long term career employees who resent President Trump coming in changing things. They are satisfied with the status quo, corruption and all, and don’t want to lose their power or their place at the trough.
POTUS: Schiff cannot even ask his own questions.
Now Chris Wallace is attacking the credibility of the ambassador who actually knows the facts.
Republicans are striking back and Wallace not use to it. My opinion
Well surprisingly I’m enjoying hearing these witnesses believe they think they know what they’re talking about regarding Ukraine...they just revealed they haven’t a clue now or when things changed.
“FACTS”??!! They don’t have time for facts. They have a coup to attend to!
A jealous queer glaring at a beauty.
Quotes:
Rep. K. Michael Conaway (R-Texas) made a motion to subpoena the whistleblower. After a back-and-forth, Schiff responded that the motion will be suspended until after today’s witnesses testify.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) claimed that Schiff is the only lawmaker who knows the identity of the whistleblower — a statement Schiff immediately disputed.
Schiff: “I do not know the identity of the whistleblower, and I am determined to make sure that identity is protected,” he said.
He sure as Hell knows the identity. Was he called on THIS LATEST LIE?
In the July 25th phone call, The President even mentions Biden bragging about holding back a billion dollars in exchange for firing the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating Barisma. So anything from Ukraine would be exculpatory at best.
NBC panel in Russia Putin Russia mode
-PJ
Would you be so kind as to tell me whose staffer this is (I’m multitasking and missed this tidbit)?
And the staffer will be unable to provide any more than hearsay information. The need to talk to Sondlin as well to find out the context. The staffer overheard the call on July 26, the day after the Trump-Zelensky call. We have the transcript of the call. The investigations of Burisma, Crowdstrike, and the Bidens were mentioned in the call. The staffer had no knowledge of the July 25 call or its contents. The fact that Trump mentioned the investigations to Sondlin is no bombshell. And Sondlin is voicing his opinion, if in fact that is what he said.
Anyone heard anything about Justice Ginsberg being sick?
Question: how can he protect the name of the whistleblower if he doesn’t know who he is??
Exactly!....They also appear to have far more interest in Ukraine’s welfare than what benifits the US.
What does it take to “prep” for a CNN interview? You call the CNN European New Office and say that the president of Ukraine is going to make a major announcement and wants them to cover it. A couple of days, max. Done.
Instead they were one month and three weeks after the agreement with President Trump in the July 25th phone call that they would proceed with investigations of the 2016 US elections and Burisma corruption and still had not made the announcement, when they were, to quote Ambassador Taylor and under, under (wear) Kent, VERY VERY interested in having an early meeting with President Trump in the Oval Office, and supposedly KNEW that the very important financial aid to buy military weaponry was on hold as the end of the US fiscal year was then only 21 days away. That makes delay in making such an announcement completely irrational and contrary to their national interests, especially if they were responding to a quid pro quo!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.