Posted on 07/24/2019 5:39:29 AM PDT by nikos1121
Need a master class on the Mueller report before Robert Mueller testifies before Congress? Join PBS NewsHour correspondent and producer William Brangham, senior broadcast producer Mike Melia and digital politics editor and senior writer Daniel Bush on July 24 as they answer questions and walk viewers through the Russia investigation and Mueller's findings. The livestream kicks off at 7:40 a.m. EDT with a breakdown of the major findings and moments from Mueller's report. Between deep dives on parts of the report, your hosts will answer select questions from the live chat and social media.
To ask a question, use our live chat window to the right or tweet us @NewsHour.
Stay tuned for PBS NewsHour’s ongoing coverage of Mueller's testimony, which begins at 8:30 a.m. in a House Judiciary Committee hearing, and continues at noon with a House Intelligence committee hearing.
Mueller’s Pre-Structured and Organized Senility in order to dodge questions and possible ‘defense’ at a later date is not a stretch for what we’re seeing in this hearing.
My take is different. Didn’t see Buck, but Lesko kept hammering him with questions which I think were asked to get information out to people who haven’t heard any of the truth before. I think she did well.
= = =
Yeah, Score one for the Blondes.
And by that, I mean she was not the polished old white guy. She was just a ‘normal’ person, maybe even one who uses social media.
No, I don’t think the clock stops while he answers, that’s why most republicans are trying to hurry him along because of their limited time. And why he turns into a doddering old fart who can’t remember a thing when republicans are asking the questions but for the most part, seems lucid when it’s democrats, and doesn’t try to run the clock out on them.
I don’t think the point was that Fox News was mentioned far fewer times - rather that Mueller was compiling his evidence by referencing news stories.
Ouch, slapping him down for slanted biased report.
Reschenthaler is kicking ass!! Was a JAG. Impressive.
Uh Uh Uh
Then a whole lot of nothing
I don't think she expected him to contradict his public statement put out with the DOJ
At that moment, I knew that would be the take-away moment for the left. Buck was trying to refer to the actual available evidence for a specific crime, but Mueller used the moment to respond in a general theoretical sense that a president could be charged after office. Buck blew it.
It really doesn't matter, because the concept of indicting Trump after office is likely 5.5 years away, and his world-class lawyers would get any such attempt kicked out of court in a week.
The entire concept is a concession on impeachment.
Who goes to testify before a congressional committee without their reading glasses?
Who goes to testify before a congressional committee without their reading glasses?
Not watching but just reading the comments here.
“Organized senility”
Yup, that’s the impression I’m getting.
The local dog catcher has as much power as Mueller in indicting POTUS. Zip, zero, none.
Yep.. Sadly she got flustered at the end of her questioning.
Axelrod tweet: “This is delicate to say, but Mueller, whom I deeply respect, has not publicly testified before Congress in at least six years. And he does not appear as sharp as he was then.”
“Some” of the GOP are playing the game, swamp monkeys.
Looking forward to Rush’s analysis.
She did OK. His answer that she “left out one letter” in her list of documents threw her off what was an otherwise solid line of questioning. She should have just hit him back straight on “Did Barr misrepresent your report in his summary yes or no”.
It was a joint statement, he would have had to sign off, now he is saying he didn't sign off, that's big news....or he's lying and will have to correct the record.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.