Posted on 07/12/2019 7:53:04 AM PDT by bitt
In a stunning press conference today U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi explains why she she has taken no action to curb the illegal immigration influx into the U.S.
While explaining why she will not allow congress to debate, change or modify U.S. immigration laws, Pelosi outlines how the United States is part of a global society, without borders and without any sovereign right to impede the “human society” from entering our nation. Therefore, according to her outlook and worldview, U.S. politicians have no right to stop any migration movement.
Keep this in mind as we approach the 2020 election. The Speaker of the House is essentially saying, openly, publicly and without any reservation or concern, the United States of America is no longer a sovereign nation.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
How long before the shooting starts?
AAAAAANNNNNNNNND THERE it is!!!!!
Trans-national, globalist, new world order in clear text!
Folks knew it, now they admit it.
Chaos to the enemy!
KYPD
Biden did.
Lock and Load Boys and girls, Lock and Load!
It really is interesting to contemplate her position within a military context. I don’t mean to violate Godwin’s Law, but if Nancy Pelosi saw German armies heading into France or Poland, would she have any grounds to oppose it? In a global society, people just move around don’t they? And so what if some of the people wear uniforms?
The USA is being invaded by foreigners and Nancy doesn’t care.
Nailed it.
Yep. She’s not thinking it through or, more precisely, she is hoping her constituents don’t think it through. I don’t think she and her ilk are that stupid. I think they know that their supporters are that stupid.
Naughty Nan, show me ANYWHERE in the US Constitution (that silly piece of paper you swore to support and defend) that we are part of a global community? Further, what article and section is it that we are subject to another nations laws?
The video is over here if you weren’t looking for the sundress treefort blog.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnwtXufqr3A
“The RATs just lost the House (and the Senate and the Presidency).
No, they didn’t. The Free Sh*t Army just wants its free sh*t. They don’t care about abstractions like “sovereignty.” “
Remember also, the sheer numbers of “young people” who honestly believe the government is responsible for all that free 5h1t and socialism is ‘ok’ Folk have complained for decades that the public education system was not educating. Fact is it wasn’t teaching RRRH, but was loading up on socialistic indoctrination...that was continued into high priced, debt causing universities.
It is a narrow path ahead...
KYPD
Re-elect them at OUR peril."
Yup.
Perhaps the biggest problem we now face, is that with at least the Soebarkah and Bush Jr. administrations, our country has been flooded with foreigners who largely disrespect our country and rule of law. Many (most?) of those foreigners, coupled with our own group of America haters, agree with Pelosi and the rest of them.
Are there enough "independents" and even "blue dog" dems left out there who will side with us and reject this national suicide? Or are we effectively outnumbered now? We shale see in 2020, yet another seminal election.
A republic...if you can keep it.
Question I wish the press would, but never will ask.
Madame Speaker, would you feel the same way if the immigrants in question overwhelmingly voted Republican?
Sadly I don’t think we’ll make 2020, we can’t ,stop the influx, like a sinking lifeboat, at some point you have to beat them off with the oars
How about 'Realists'? I'm going to attempt to outline the basic position of realists; others are welcome to amend as they see fit. Realists:
1. Recognize danger when good men are willing to trade liberty and freedom for safety while enemies attack the very basis of government.
2. Understand the founders - with only 1/3 support - based their decisions to rebel against tyranny not on precedent but faith and resolve.
3. Applaud Lincoln who - with only 1/3 support - utilized unique interpretations of the constitution to validate support for the union.
4. Realize that Trump - with 1/2 support - has a 225 year basis of precedent of multiple avenues of action - including calling out the militia - to suppress rebellion in states, departments and agencies engaged in insurrection, mutiny and treason.
5. Clearly see that Trump will not take those many and varied actions required to restore the republic, thus condemning hundreds of millions to future civil conflicts as the USA passes on the world state as a global leader.
Unlike never Trumpers, realists don't care if Trump is crude, remarked that powerful men could grab women by the pvssy, marry, divorce and upgrade to beautiful younger women, or exhibit any other social faux paus. What realists despise is the manipulation of Trump's base of supporters as if they are carnival rubes. Realists tire of the sad bunch of characters who, ignorant of history, of tradition, of movements, applaud their favorite as the very foundation crumbles around them.
The USA is being invaded by foreigners and Nancy doesn’t care.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The worst part is that neither do Bush League Republicans.
Now is the time to get rid of the Bush League Republicans, starting with Flimsey Grahamnesty.
Bush League Republicans want to help the Democrats get a permanent majority through amnesty.
Before President Trump the citizens had virtually NO representation.
For 2020, the ones up are, Flimsey Grahamnesty, Tillis, Gardner, McSally, Daines, Collins, Cornyn, Capito, Enzi, Rounds, Sasse, Hyde-Smith, Ernst and McConnell.
They all should have primary challengers.
They are all Bush League Republicans.
They need to be replaced with real Republicans that side with the citizens and the rule of law.
The only ones worthy of re-election are Inhofe, Sullivan, Cotton, Perdue, Risch and Cassidy.
The referenced article contains a video of Speaker Pelosi. At 1:35 in the video Pelosi clarifies that an ICE warrant is not the same as a search warrant which is true, Pelosi making a distinction between ICE warrants and the court-issued search warrant of the 4th Amendment (4A). Pelosi encourages illegal immigrants not to let ICE officials into their homes on that premise.
But where vote-desperate Democrats like Pelosi have the wires crossed with respect to emphasizing the difference between ICE warrant versus 4A search warrant is that non-citizens are not protected by constitutionally enumerated protections as citizens are imo.
Also, consider that some of the illegal immigrant so-called “families” that Pelosi defends in the videos are possibly front-ends for human trafficking.
Finally, regarding wealthy politicians like Pelosi, I suspect that rich people have long since discovered that becoming career politicians by buying votes with government freebies paid for by taxpayer dollars is a way to eat their cake and have it too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.